This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Shaker shocker
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Kermit8  Hevon 30 Oct 15 1.42pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Why on earth did those idiotic yanks let Jamal go? In California some guy got 20 years for stealing a pizza a while back yet this extremist was let out in half that time.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 30 Oct 15 2.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
You could quite easily commit a string of murders and end up serving 14 years - put this into some context. Also the quasi-fascist comments about the left are completely off the mark and have nothing to do with most of these threads.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Stuk  Top half 30 Oct 15 2.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 12.45pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 12.26pm
Its actually irrelivent whether he is guilty or not, its about the fact that he's never been tried. The right to a trial, in the UK, dates back to the very first ever real documentation of law in the UK. Right or Left wing, I'd generally assume that the right of the state to imprison people without trial is illegal. Luckily the circumstance of his arrest, were solid. He was captured by bounty hunters, paid by the Northern Alliance (who were basically glorified smack runners with an army) fighting for Al-Qaeda / The Taliban (Dependent on who you ask). The Northern Alliance paid for foreign fighters, as it could pass them onto the US.
I hope his coffee lived up to expectation.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Oct 15 2.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Stuk at 30 Oct 2015 2.18pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 12.45pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 12.26pm
Its actually irrelivent whether he is guilty or not, its about the fact that he's never been tried. The right to a trial, in the UK, dates back to the very first ever real documentation of law in the UK. Right or Left wing, I'd generally assume that the right of the state to imprison people without trial is illegal. Luckily the circumstance of his arrest, were solid. He was captured by bounty hunters, paid by the Northern Alliance (who were basically glorified smack runners with an army) fighting for Al-Qaeda / The Taliban (Dependent on who you ask). The Northern Alliance paid for foreign fighters, as it could pass them onto the US.
I hope his coffee lived up to expectation. He's a British national, married to a British Woman. It has everything to do with our law (as he's a citizen of the UK) and US law, as they're the country that took him to Guantanemo bay and Camp-XRAY which is a US base (and thus US nationality).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Oct 15 2.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote ASCPFC at 30 Oct 2015 2.06pm
You could quite easily commit a string of murders and end up serving 14 years - put this into some context. Also the quasi-fascist comments about the left are completely off the mark and have nothing to do with most of these threads. You'd serve 14 years, but you'd be on a life tariff, which means you need Home Office approval to leave the UK usually (in all likelihood if you commited a string of murders in the UK, you'd get a minimum of 20 to whole life tariff). Arguably even that is better than letting someone go that you 'were certain was a terrorist for 14 years' and then decided wasn't worth putting on trial.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| stevegood 30 Oct 15 2.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 2.28pm
Quote Stuk at 30 Oct 2015 2.18pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 12.45pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 12.26pm
Its actually irrelivent whether he is guilty or not, its about the fact that he's never been tried. The right to a trial, in the UK, dates back to the very first ever real documentation of law in the UK. Right or Left wing, I'd generally assume that the right of the state to imprison people without trial is illegal. Luckily the circumstance of his arrest, were solid. He was captured by bounty hunters, paid by the Northern Alliance (who were basically glorified smack runners with an army) fighting for Al-Qaeda / The Taliban (Dependent on who you ask). The Northern Alliance paid for foreign fighters, as it could pass them onto the US.
I hope his coffee lived up to expectation. He's a British national, married to a British Woman. It has everything to do with our law (as he's a citizen of the UK) and US law, as they're the country that took him to Guantanemo bay and Camp-XRAY which is a US base (and thus US nationality). He is not a British citizen, he is a Saudi Arabian citizen - I wonder how they would treat someone returning to the country strongly suspected of meaning it harm?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 30 Oct 15 2.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 2.28pm
Quote Stuk at 30 Oct 2015 2.18pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 12.45pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 12.26pm
Its actually irrelivent whether he is guilty or not, its about the fact that he's never been tried. The right to a trial, in the UK, dates back to the very first ever real documentation of law in the UK. Right or Left wing, I'd generally assume that the right of the state to imprison people without trial is illegal. Luckily the circumstance of his arrest, were solid. He was captured by bounty hunters, paid by the Northern Alliance (who were basically glorified smack runners with an army) fighting for Al-Qaeda / The Taliban (Dependent on who you ask). The Northern Alliance paid for foreign fighters, as it could pass them onto the US.
I hope his coffee lived up to expectation. He's a British national, married to a British Woman. It has everything to do with our law (as he's a citizen of the UK) and US law, as they're the country that took him to Guantanemo bay and Camp-XRAY which is a US base (and thus US nationality).
As I said, nothing to do with us until today.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 30 Oct 15 2.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 2.28pm
Quote Stuk at 30 Oct 2015 2.18pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 12.45pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 12.26pm
Its actually irrelivent whether he is guilty or not, its about the fact that he's never been tried. The right to a trial, in the UK, dates back to the very first ever real documentation of law in the UK. Right or Left wing, I'd generally assume that the right of the state to imprison people without trial is illegal. Luckily the circumstance of his arrest, were solid. He was captured by bounty hunters, paid by the Northern Alliance (who were basically glorified smack runners with an army) fighting for Al-Qaeda / The Taliban (Dependent on who you ask). The Northern Alliance paid for foreign fighters, as it could pass them onto the US.
I hope his coffee lived up to expectation. He's a British national, married to a British Woman. It has everything to do with our law (as he's a citizen of the UK) and US law, as they're the country that took him to Guantanemo bay and Camp-XRAY which is a US base (and thus US nationality).
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| stevegood 31 Oct 15 12.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I see Shaker is 'undergoing medical tests' - looking for weapons of mass destruction I expect. Love the picture of ernest chap holding 'welcome home shaker' poster, he could have added 'please don't blow us up if you are in fact a terrorist'. Mind you, he might be just trying to curry favour in the hope of a contribution to his organistation from the millions that Shaker will no doubt be awarded by tax-payers.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| oldcodger 31 Oct 15 1.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 2.39pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 2.28pm
Quote Stuk at 30 Oct 2015 2.18pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 12.45pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 12.26pm
Its actually irrelivent whether he is guilty or not, its about the fact that he's never been tried. The right to a trial, in the UK, dates back to the very first ever real documentation of law in the UK. Right or Left wing, I'd generally assume that the right of the state to imprison people without trial is illegal. Luckily the circumstance of his arrest, were solid. He was captured by bounty hunters, paid by the Northern Alliance (who were basically glorified smack runners with an army) fighting for Al-Qaeda / The Taliban (Dependent on who you ask). The Northern Alliance paid for foreign fighters, as it could pass them onto the US.
I hope his coffee lived up to expectation. He's a British national, married to a British Woman. It has everything to do with our law (as he's a citizen of the UK) and US law, as they're the country that took him to Guantanemo bay and Camp-XRAY which is a US base (and thus US nationality). He is not a British citizen, he is a Saudi Arabian citizen - I wonder how they would treat someone returning to the country strongly suspected of meaning it harm? Only he isn't strongly suspected of trying to harm the country. I know with the way you come across you feel that you're doing the right thing, but you clearly have little idea of the push at the time to fill GBay and how embarrassing it now is for them to admit that there are no grounds at all for the presence of many there. Hence innocent people remained for a long, long time. There was effectively a bounty system, all kinds of people got caught up in it. Edited by oldcodger (31 Oct 2015 1.01pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| stevegood 31 Oct 15 8.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote oldcodger at 31 Oct 2015 1.00pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 2.39pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 2.28pm
Quote Stuk at 30 Oct 2015 2.18pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 12.45pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 12.26pm
Its actually irrelivent whether he is guilty or not, its about the fact that he's never been tried. The right to a trial, in the UK, dates back to the very first ever real documentation of law in the UK. Right or Left wing, I'd generally assume that the right of the state to imprison people without trial is illegal. Luckily the circumstance of his arrest, were solid. He was captured by bounty hunters, paid by the Northern Alliance (who were basically glorified smack runners with an army) fighting for Al-Qaeda / The Taliban (Dependent on who you ask). The Northern Alliance paid for foreign fighters, as it could pass them onto the US.
I hope his coffee lived up to expectation. He's a British national, married to a British Woman. It has everything to do with our law (as he's a citizen of the UK) and US law, as they're the country that took him to Guantanemo bay and Camp-XRAY which is a US base (and thus US nationality). He is not a British citizen, he is a Saudi Arabian citizen - I wonder how they would treat someone returning to the country strongly suspected of meaning it harm? Only he isn't strongly suspected of trying to harm the country. I know with the way you come across you feel that you're doing the right thing, but you clearly have little idea of the push at the time to fill GBay and how embarrassing it now is for them to admit that there are no grounds at all for the presence of many there. Hence innocent people remained for a long, long time. There was effectively a bounty system, all kinds of people got caught up in it. Edited by oldcodger (31 Oct 2015 1.01pm) Check this out:
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 31 Oct 15 8.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote stevegood at 31 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote oldcodger at 31 Oct 2015 1.00pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 2.39pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 2.28pm
Quote Stuk at 30 Oct 2015 2.18pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 12.45pm
Quote stevegood at 30 Oct 2015 12.26pm
Its actually irrelivent whether he is guilty or not, its about the fact that he's never been tried. The right to a trial, in the UK, dates back to the very first ever real documentation of law in the UK. Right or Left wing, I'd generally assume that the right of the state to imprison people without trial is illegal. Luckily the circumstance of his arrest, were solid. He was captured by bounty hunters, paid by the Northern Alliance (who were basically glorified smack runners with an army) fighting for Al-Qaeda / The Taliban (Dependent on who you ask). The Northern Alliance paid for foreign fighters, as it could pass them onto the US.
I hope his coffee lived up to expectation. He's a British national, married to a British Woman. It has everything to do with our law (as he's a citizen of the UK) and US law, as they're the country that took him to Guantanemo bay and Camp-XRAY which is a US base (and thus US nationality). He is not a British citizen, he is a Saudi Arabian citizen - I wonder how they would treat someone returning to the country strongly suspected of meaning it harm? Only he isn't strongly suspected of trying to harm the country. I know with the way you come across you feel that you're doing the right thing, but you clearly have little idea of the push at the time to fill GBay and how embarrassing it now is for them to admit that there are no grounds at all for the presence of many there. Hence innocent people remained for a long, long time. There was effectively a bounty system, all kinds of people got caught up in it. Edited by oldcodger (31 Oct 2015 1.01pm) Check this out:
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.