This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
leggedstruggle Croydon 22 Aug 15 8.58pm | |
---|---|
Quote Ouzo Dan at 22 Aug 2015 7.45pm
China will not allow north Korea to be defeated. Couldn't China be brought down too? Historically as bad as North Korea.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ouzo Dan Behind you 22 Aug 15 9.11pm | |
---|---|
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Aug 2015 8.58pm
Quote Ouzo Dan at 22 Aug 2015 7.45pm
China will not allow north Korea to be defeated. Couldn't China be brought down too? Historically as bad as North Korea. Im confident we could but the cost would be astronomical, we would all be f***ed.
The mountains are calling & I must go. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ouzo Dan Behind you 22 Aug 15 9.16pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 22 Aug 2015 8.52pm
Quote Ouzo Dan at 22 Aug 2015 8.36pm
Russia vs Europe backed by the United states is where it will all start.
I think the most likely start of WW3 is the battle for the arctic resources. Im hoping we nail down green energy before then, Fusion reactors remain painfully close yet out of reach. If we start scraping those barrels of oil, literally every nation on the planet will be at each others throats.
The mountains are calling & I must go. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 22 Aug 15 11.28pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 22 Aug 2015 8.22pm
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Aug 2015 7.51pm
The huge number of concentration camps dotted around the country make you wrong. Pyongyang is where the favoured live. The regime is strong everywhere within its borders, unfortunately. Another by-product of (old) US foreign policy. Edited by Kermit8 (22 Aug 2015 7.51pm)
Rather simplistically Kermy....If North Korea were strong outside of the capital....They wouldn't need concentration camps......It doesn't tend to be a place where you put your supporters. Outside of Pyongyang......The will to fight or indeed.....the technology to fight isn't significant. In a war with the west the North Koreans would quickly lose air superiority......They would be quickly running to China like last time.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SwalecliffeEagle Swalecliffe 23 Aug 15 5.58am | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Aug 2015 7.51pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 22 Aug 2015 6.50pm
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Aug 2015 5.00pm
Agreed Maple. One million strong army and a brainwashed population. It's like Japan from the 1930's but this lot have one extra weapon they didn't. They will suicide themselves and nuke Seoul probably.
The regime is only strong in its capital. The million strong army is nothing like as strong as western might if it came to it. In fact, the longer we wait for this regime to fall then the more certain it is that they will develop the technology to accurately deliver their nuclear capability. Whatever happens......Something has to give eventually.
Pyongyang is where the favoured live. The regime is strong everywhere within its borders, unfortunately. Another by-product of (old) US foreign policy. Edited by Kermit8 (22 Aug 2015 7.51pm) I may have misunderstood what you mean but it seems to me that you have granted the U.S. too much credibility and influence with regards to developments on the Korean Peninsula. Cold War antics often require a more 'pericentric' understanding, to borrow Tony Smith's terminology. Unlike their campaigns around the Americas (Guatemala 1954, The Bay of Pigs etc.), which saw the U.S. obsession with the Monroe Doctrine and hemispheric security give birth to an aggressive policy which Chomsky has called the 'Mafia Doctrine', conflict in the Korean Peninsula in 1950 was more the result of peripheral leaders such as Syngman Rhee and Kim Il Sung dragging their superpower allies into a conflict no one wanted. Actually, given the U.S. obsession at the time with 'rolling back Communism', it's surprising they never pushed on into China once they had managed to force the conflict above the 38th parallel. Factor in the consideration that the U.S. were attempting to create a democratic state next door in Japan, which would have undoubtedly been threatened by an expansionist N. Korea, and I think U.S. action in Korea to be fair and understandable. I don't have blanket support for the U.S. but I'm intrigued to know why you see them as responsible for the state of North Korea, and not the various Soviet and Chinese leaders that have propped them up over the years.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
snytaxx London 23 Aug 15 7.45am | |
---|---|
Quote Ouzo Dan at 22 Aug 2015 9.11pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Aug 2015 8.58pm
Quote Ouzo Dan at 22 Aug 2015 7.45pm
China will not allow north Korea to be defeated. Couldn't China be brought down too? Historically as bad as North Korea. Im confident we could but the cost would be astronomical, we would all be f***ed.
You realise the amount of money China puts into the UK economy right?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
radsyrendot From Coventry now in Leicester 23 Aug 15 7.49am | |
---|---|
Quote GlaziertoEagle at 22 Aug 2015 6.48pm
Quote radsyrendot at 22 Aug 2015 6.08pm
My nephew is an English teacher in S. K
I love the country and they actually have a real love for their Northern cousins, most South Koreans would like their countries reunited. That won't be happening any time soon though. He's in a place called Gojae. He says it's a it slow paced compared to Bucheon and Seoul it's his 2nd time out there he was out there a few yrs ago for 2 yrs
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 23 Aug 15 8.17am | |
---|---|
Quote SwalecliffeEagle at 23 Aug 2015 5.58am
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Aug 2015 7.51pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 22 Aug 2015 6.50pm
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Aug 2015 5.00pm
Agreed Maple. One million strong army and a brainwashed population. It's like Japan from the 1930's but this lot have one extra weapon they didn't. They will suicide themselves and nuke Seoul probably.
The regime is only strong in its capital. The million strong army is nothing like as strong as western might if it came to it. In fact, the longer we wait for this regime to fall then the more certain it is that they will develop the technology to accurately deliver their nuclear capability. Whatever happens......Something has to give eventually.
Pyongyang is where the favoured live. The regime is strong everywhere within its borders, unfortunately. Another by-product of (old) US foreign policy. Edited by Kermit8 (22 Aug 2015 7.51pm) I may have misunderstood what you mean but it seems to me that you have granted the U.S. too much credibility and influence with regards to developments on the Korean Peninsula. Cold War antics often require a more 'pericentric' understanding, to borrow Tony Smith's terminology. Unlike their campaigns around the Americas (Guatemala 1954, The Bay of Pigs etc.), which saw the U.S. obsession with the Monroe Doctrine and hemispheric security give birth to an aggressive policy which Chomsky has called the 'Mafia Doctrine', conflict in the Korean Peninsula in 1950 was more the result of peripheral leaders such as Syngman Rhee and Kim Il Sung dragging their superpower allies into a conflict no one wanted. Actually, given the U.S. obsession at the time with 'rolling back Communism', it's surprising they never pushed on into China once they had managed to force the conflict above the 38th parallel. Factor in the consideration that the U.S. were attempting to create a democratic state next door in Japan, which would have undoubtedly been threatened by an expansionist N. Korea, and I think U.S. action in Korea to be fair and understandable. I don't have blanket support for the U.S. but I'm intrigued to know why you see them as responsible for the state of North Korea, and not the various Soviet and Chinese leaders that have propped them up over the years. Interesting stuff. I was thinking more of the extreme paranoia and anti-US stance that is still so strong. You have to wonder what events came to pass to make a country so mentally ill. One possibly could be that the U.S. attacked - with bullets and bombs - column after column of fleeing refugees of all ages until well over one million of them lay dead and splattered. This massacre was approved from the very top. The reason? They thought that maybe some commies were hiding amongst the refugees so best just to kill them all. Nice.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 23 Aug 15 8.26am | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 23 Aug 2015 8.17am
Quote SwalecliffeEagle at 23 Aug 2015 5.58am
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Aug 2015 7.51pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 22 Aug 2015 6.50pm
Quote Kermit8 at 22 Aug 2015 5.00pm
Agreed Maple. One million strong army and a brainwashed population. It's like Japan from the 1930's but this lot have one extra weapon they didn't. They will suicide themselves and nuke Seoul probably.
The regime is only strong in its capital. The million strong army is nothing like as strong as western might if it came to it. In fact, the longer we wait for this regime to fall then the more certain it is that they will develop the technology to accurately deliver their nuclear capability. Whatever happens......Something has to give eventually.
Pyongyang is where the favoured live. The regime is strong everywhere within its borders, unfortunately. Another by-product of (old) US foreign policy. Edited by Kermit8 (22 Aug 2015 7.51pm) I may have misunderstood what you mean but it seems to me that you have granted the U.S. too much credibility and influence with regards to developments on the Korean Peninsula. Cold War antics often require a more 'pericentric' understanding, to borrow Tony Smith's terminology. Unlike their campaigns around the Americas (Guatemala 1954, The Bay of Pigs etc.), which saw the U.S. obsession with the Monroe Doctrine and hemispheric security give birth to an aggressive policy which Chomsky has called the 'Mafia Doctrine', conflict in the Korean Peninsula in 1950 was more the result of peripheral leaders such as Syngman Rhee and Kim Il Sung dragging their superpower allies into a conflict no one wanted. Actually, given the U.S. obsession at the time with 'rolling back Communism', it's surprising they never pushed on into China once they had managed to force the conflict above the 38th parallel. Factor in the consideration that the U.S. were attempting to create a democratic state next door in Japan, which would have undoubtedly been threatened by an expansionist N. Korea, and I think U.S. action in Korea to be fair and understandable. I don't have blanket support for the U.S. but I'm intrigued to know why you see them as responsible for the state of North Korea, and not the various Soviet and Chinese leaders that have propped them up over the years. Interesting stuff. I was thinking more of the extreme paranoia and anti-US stance that is still so strong. You have to wonder what events came to pass to make a country so mentally ill. One possibly could be that the U.S. attacked - with bullets and bombs - column after column of fleeing refugees of all ages until well over one million of them lay dead and splattered. This massacre was approved from the very top. The reason? They thought that maybe some commies were hiding amongst the refugees so best just to kill them all. Nice. It is not as if all the other totalitarian, nut-job communist countries were anti-US is it?
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 23 Aug 15 9.57am | |
---|---|
I used to go out with a girl called Kim from The Borough in the 70's..... I wonder what she's doing now... sigh... She was a bit mental, but very pretty.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 23 Aug 15 10.10am | |
---|---|
Well I don't buy into the western propaganda which portrays the North Korean regime as a rogue nation and their leader as some sort of nutter. We carry this belief that the West is good and other nations that don't subscribe to a western democratic society is somehow wrong and their leaders are maniacs who would bomb you and their only goal is to destroy our way of life. Complete nonsense. Our leaders and society is just as bad, if not worse. We arm ourselves with massive nukes and invade other countries and start wars, yet we have the temerity to accuse other nations of something they might do because they're a bit different to us and keep themselves to themselves. WE are the aggressors in this world and OUR leaders are the despots.
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 23 Aug 15 10.25am | |
---|---|
Quote Pussay Patrol at 23 Aug 2015 10.10am
Well I don't buy into the western propaganda which portrays the North Korean regime as a rogue nation and their leader as some sort of nutter. We carry this belief that the West is good and other nations that don't subscribe to a western democratic society is somehow wrong and their leaders are maniacs who would bomb you and their only goal is to destroy our way of life. Complete nonsense. Our leaders and society is just as bad, if not worse. We arm ourselves with massive nukes and invade other countries and start wars, yet we have the temerity to accuse other nations of something they might do because they're a bit different to us and keep themselves to themselves. WE are the aggressors in this world and OUR leaders are the despots.
I think you might also struggle to find the North Korean diet palatable as they have massive shortages of anything other than basic dietary foodstuffs like rice and grain.... although this doesn't apply to the high ranking officials and Kim himself. However... you keep believing that we are the ones causing all the suffering....
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.