This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Rachid Rachid Rachid 18 Jan 21 10.27pm | |
---|---|
I didn’t think we played too badly in the first half but once the second goal goes in it becomes a training game for them and damage limitation for us with the Liverpool game fresh in the memory. City’s squad cost £800mil and ours £150mil with significant proportion of that spent in 16/17.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eagle@ tn34 hastings 18 Jan 21 10.38pm | |
---|---|
A lot of people on here with short memories and feel the need to justify s*** football. So I dont buy all this " they are too big fish for us to fry etc" We have just bottled it as a club !! COYP
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ex hibitionist Hastings 18 Jan 21 10.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rachid Rachid Rachid
I didn’t think we played too badly in the first half but once the second goal goes in it becomes a training game for them and damage limitation for us with the Liverpool game fresh in the memory. City’s squad cost £800mil and ours £150mil with significant proportion of that spent in 16/17. that is all true, but Ayew was trying to do the Benteke role and doing it very badly - Benteke is better in the Benteke role, so why play Ayew if you want a Benteke-type job done? The link up play between Eze, Ayew and Townsend was non-existent, early on it opened up for us and we were a bit tentative, later in the game we were just as tentative going in their half never mind their penalty area, and it wan't a Pulis-like clever surrender of possession, it was giving the ball away due to going nowhere in midfield. There were even times when going forward was the safe option, but they weren't 'on it'. You don't keep the score down by surrendering the ball due to lack of bottle/belief - that's why the gripes are justified imho.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 18 Jan 21 11.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eagle@ tn34
A lot of people on here with short memories and feel the need to justify s*** football. So I dont buy all this " they are too big fish for us to fry etc" We have just bottled it as a club !! COYP
The Wilfless games against Burnley and Newcastle saw two disappointing defeats. Whilst Wilf doesn't always perform well when he plays (I thought him pretty mediocre against Arsenal, for example) his presence in the side seems to give the other players more belief and confidence and we generally play better as a result.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rachid Rachid Rachid 18 Jan 21 11.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
that is all true, but Ayew was trying to do the Benteke role and doing it very badly - Benteke is better in the Benteke role, so why play Ayew if you want a Benteke-type job done? The link up play between Eze, Ayew and Townsend was non-existent, early on it opened up for us and we were a bit tentative, later in the game we were just as tentative going in their half never mind their penalty area, and it wan't a Pulis-like clever surrender of possession, it was giving the ball away due to going nowhere in midfield. There were even times when going forward was the safe option, but they weren't 'on it'. You don't keep the score down by surrendering the ball due to lack of bottle/belief - that's why the gripes are justified imho. We’ll have to agree to disagree on Benteke and every time I see his name mentioned to justify people’s narrative about the manager it just undermines their argument IMO. He’s got the touch of a rapist, continually loses the ball, a feeble shot and joke goal scoring record. Ayew on the other hand scored more goals last season than Benteke has managed in three, works harder for the team and is better at retaining the ball. However, we’ve not seen much of that this season and I’d concede that choosing between him and Benteke at present is akin to choosing which bollock to have cut off Ultimately Benteke probably suits the way set up best and offers height from set pieces which, with hindsight, may have helped last night but arguments either way are tenuous. The lack of link up between the three players is down to quality, age and energy IMO even Eze is guilty of giving the ball up easily and the first two goals actually came from us trying to overplay in our half. Edited by Rachid Rachid Rachid (18 Jan 2021 11.34pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rachid Rachid Rachid 18 Jan 21 11.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by doombear
The Wilfless games against Burnley and Newcastle saw two disappointing defeats. Whilst Wilf doesn't always perform well when he plays (I thought him pretty mediocre against Arsenal, for example) his presence in the side seems to give the other players more belief and confidence and we generally play better as a result. This is the reality. We’re a one man team lacking in attacking quality and legs. Eze obviously promising but that’s about it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Jan 21 11.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rachid Rachid Rachid
This is the reality. We’re a one man team lacking in attacking quality and legs. Eze obviously promising but that’s about it. I concur with these sentiments. Aged defenders who lack pace and as such we have to defend deep and cannot advance up the pitch.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Den1923 19 Jan 21 7.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I concur with these sentiments. Aged defenders who lack pace and as such we have to defend deep and cannot advance up the pitch. Excellent summary Willo,!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 19 Jan 21 9.23am | |
---|---|
Liverpool, high press, destroyed us, Wolves the same, Man City the same. What’s the easiest way to beat a high press, take them out of the game and get them turning round and chasing the ball by playing it long to two target men and look to the two wide men to pick up the knockdowns. So what did we do against Citeh? We play Ayew on his own who can’t win the ball in the air and can’t hold it up. The reason the midfield looked terrible was because there was no out ball. We are not good enough to pass it round them and everyone knows it, so that left us looking congested in our own half and they just picked us off with their midfield hunting the ball in twos and then utilising their quick passing and movement to cut us apart. We couldn’t have set up any better to play into their hands and we got what we deserved from the game, absolutely nothing. 2 goals for their centre half who wouldn’t even be there if we had two forwards offering an out ball on the last shoulder of defence. I can’t believe people are blaming individual errors for their goals either. If you are under sustained pressure for the entire match, eventually mistakes will occur. How often do you see error free defensive displays. No questions over the ability of Man City, they are a damn good team and will probably win the league, but we made it easy for them. For those who have the time, look back at the games where we were terrible and you will see it is mostly instigated by teams playing a high press against us. We panic, and end up giving the ball away. I don’t disagree about our ageing side and their limitations as they are clear to see, however I do see the same mistakes being made against certain teams and certain tactics. Now whose responsibility is that I wonder?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Jan 21 9.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Den1923
Excellent summary Willo,! Thank you very much,most kind of you.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Booted Eagle Bristol 19 Jan 21 9.36am | |
---|---|
If you take a four goal deficit as a drubbing then that is now 3 this season against the supposed top teams. With only a half of the season gone might well be one or two more. Seems a little more than previous seasons ?
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Jan 21 9.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Liverpool, high press, destroyed us, Wolves the same, Man City the same. What’s the easiest way to beat a high press, take them out of the game and get them turning round and chasing the ball by playing it long to two target men and look to the two wide men to pick up the knockdowns. So what did we do against Citeh? We play Ayew on his own who can’t win the ball in the air and can’t hold it up. The reason the midfield looked terrible was because there was no out ball. We are not good enough to pass it round them and everyone knows it, so that left us looking congested in our own half and they just picked us off with their midfield hunting the ball in twos and then utilising their quick passing and movement to cut us apart. We couldn’t have set up any better to play into their hands and we got what we deserved from the game, absolutely nothing. 2 goals for their centre half who wouldn’t even be there if we had two forwards offering an out ball on the last shoulder of defence. I can’t believe people are blaming individual errors for their goals either. If you are under sustained pressure for the entire match, eventually mistakes will occur. How often do you see error free defensive displays. No questions over the ability of Man City, they are a damn good team and will probably win the league, but we made it easy for them. For those who have the time, look back at the games where we were terrible and you will see it is mostly instigated by teams playing a high press against us. We panic, and end up giving the ball away. I don’t disagree about our ageing side and their limitations as they are clear to see, however I do see the same mistakes being made against certain teams and certain tactics. Now whose responsibility is that I wonder? With respect, the goals scored by Stones were following corners and one would suspect a tall centre-half to be brought up in this phase of the game. Apropos Ayew, perhaps the thinking was that he has shown what he can do running the channels and offers more mobility than Benteke and that this might have been required to relieve the pressure. Edited by Willo (19 Jan 2021 9.46am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.