This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jeeagles 05 Oct 15 11.33pm | |
---|---|
Quote jeeagles at 05 Oct 2015 11.32pm
This World Cup has made me realise the CPFC2010 could show the RFU a thing or to about how to run a team properly. If you compare the two orginsations it shows how well we are run, and how messed up the RFU is. Since 2003 England have won 1 six nations and 0 grand slams. Wales have 3 grand slams and 4 titles. England should be much better but are simply a hopeless. Since 2010 Palace have achieve a higher finish every season. Where as England have regressed from World Cup quarter finalist to knocked out in the first round. We all know CPFC2010 are screwed successful businessmen. Whilst Ian Ritchie at the RFU has a track record of old school tie jobs at the underperforming Channel 5 and British Lawn Tennis. For advice picking manager CPFC2010 go to Steve Coppell. He's our most successful manager so must know a thing or to. The RFU go to Rob Andrew, who has achieved nothing, and won't listen to Sir Clive Woodward. Each successive palace manager under CPFC2010 has had a better track record than their predecessor (except warnock). None of the England managers since Warnock have had any track record worth talking about despite the fact they have the money to get anyone they want. Palace have coaches with experience of the club, England have a coach from another sport. In terms of style of place and personnel. Palace have been very careful to only sign players with the right attitude and good for the club. We've played in pretty much the same formation for 4 years bringing in players who suit the system. The England selection policy is a f***ing joke. And when it comes to taking responsibility CPFC2010 have always been honest about their mistakes. The RFU are going to come out with a FIFA style report in a few months when they think nobody is looking which will draw the conclusion that it was a hard group and wasn't really there fault that the biggest rugby playing nation in the world went out in the first round.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 06 Oct 15 7.41am | |
---|---|
Quote jeeagles at 05 Oct 2015 11.33pm
Quote jeeagles at 05 Oct 2015 11.32pm
This World Cup has made me realise the CPFC2010 could show the RFU a thing or to about how to run a team properly. If you compare the two orginsations it shows how well we are run, and how messed up the RFU is. Since 2003 England have won 1 six nations and 0 grand slams. Wales have 3 grand slams and 4 titles. England should be much better but are simply a hopeless. Since 2010 Palace have achieve a higher finish every season. Where as England have regressed from World Cup quarter finalist to knocked out in the first round. We all know CPFC2010 are screwed successful businessmen. Whilst Ian Ritchie at the RFU has a track record of old school tie jobs at the underperforming Channel 5 and British Lawn Tennis. For advice picking manager CPFC2010 go to Steve Coppell. He's our most successful manager so must know a thing or to. The RFU go to Rob Andrew, who has achieved nothing, and won't listen to Sir Clive Woodward. Each successive palace manager under CPFC2010 has had a better track record than their predecessor (except warnock). None of the England managers since Warnock have had any track record worth talking about despite the fact they have the money to get anyone they want. Palace have coaches with experience of the club, England have a coach from another sport. In terms of style of place and personnel. Palace have been very careful to only sign players with the right attitude and good for the club. We've played in pretty much the same formation for 4 years bringing in players who suit the system. The England selection policy is a f***ing joke. And when it comes to king responsibility CPFC2010 have always been honest about their mistakes. The RFU are going to come out with a FIFA style report in a few months when they think nobody is looking which will draw the conclusion that it was a hard group and wasn't really there fault that the biggest rugby playing nation in the world went out in the first round.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 06 Oct 15 9.02am | |
---|---|
Not strictly being an egg chaser, I have read all posts on this thread with interest and an open mind, at first I lumped all the blame on Rob shaw for some absolutley barking mad descions on the pitch. However having read posts from more, shall we say, knowledgeable chasers of the egg, I have been converted (no pun intended) to the idea that the management (Stuart Lackluster included) from the RFU down is to blame on not building from the success of 2003. This is an english rugby team that has been missmanaged for over 10 years. Stuffed shirt attitudes towards players not playing in England. Rugby league players calling the shots, players with no international pedigree getting the nod in front of established Union players. I have always been an advocate of wishing the England " kissballers" would show as much passion, and to a degree skill in their game, however on this last showing singing the national anthem a bit loud is all the rugger buggers did better than the England football THE ONLY thing I can say about this debacle is how come we were in a group with two of the worlds top 3 sides ? thats seems a bit unfair really seeing as we are 8th in the world rugby rankings with Australia 2 and the sheep shaggers 3rd. Always going to be a tough ask.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 06 Oct 15 9.14am | |
---|---|
Quote dannyh at 06 Oct 2015 9.02am
THE ONLY thing I can say about this debacle is how come we were in a group with two of the worlds top 3 sides ? thats seems a bit unfair really seeing as we are 8th in the world rugby rankings with Australia 2 and the sheep shaggers 3rd. Always going to be a tough ask. World Cup seedings are based on rankings at a certain point in time when the draw is made. Two of the top 8 go into each group. Because they were in a brief tailspin, Wales momentarily dropped out of the top 8, literally for a month but it was the month on which the draw was based, and were thus always going to create a pool of death. England and Australia got the short straw in the draw which added a strong team to an already ridiculously strong draw. Had Wales been drawn with Scotland and South Africa, things would have been significantly different.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 06 Oct 15 9.18am | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 06 Oct 2015 9.14am
Quote dannyh at 06 Oct 2015 9.02am
THE ONLY thing I can say about this debacle is how come we were in a group with two of the worlds top 3 sides ? thats seems a bit unfair really seeing as we are 8th in the world rugby rankings with Australia 2 and the sheep shaggers 3rd. Always going to be a tough ask. World Cup seedings are based on rankings at a certain point in time when the draw is made. Two of the top 8 go into each group. Because they were in a brief tailspin, Wales momentarily dropped out of the top 8, literally for a month but it was the month on which the draw was based, and were thus always going to create a pool of death. England and Australia got the short straw in the draw which added a strong team to an already ridiculously strong draw. Had Wales been drawn with Scotland and South Africa, things would have been significantly different. Well that system has to be a load of shyte then doesnt it ?
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 06 Oct 15 9.39am | |
---|---|
Danny, in a lot of ways what you're saying -- and it's as true of the FA and Woy as it is of the RFU and Bomber -- is that we've failed because we've reverted to type and behaved like Englishmen. You know; conciliatory, polite, well-meaning, conservative, narrow-minded and a tiny bit self-impressed. We think we're better than we are. If you think about it, our major sporting successes in half a century have all (or at least mainly) come from teams or athletes that are extremely un-English. The 2003 rugby World Cup was driven by Sir Clive; a man who was egotistical, driven, totally uncompromising, and utterly determined. As were most of his players. He won the World Cup but polite little English administrators couldn't cope with him so now he's out in the cold. Our recent Tour de France and Olympic Cycling successes were driven by Dave Brailsford. Another arrogant, uncompromising and totally driven coach. Andy Murray...achieved success with foreign coaches who were proven winners and bases himself in the States. Oh, and guess what? He's arrogant, uncompromising, and totally driven. And so the list goes on. You get the picture. Notice a pattern here? The real truth is that the English mentality and persona is not suited to sporting success. We lack a cutting edge; we don't pursue becoming elite, we default to the safe option and, mainly, we just don't work hard enough. It's often said that Ronaldo and not Rooney became the best player in the world simply because the former was unwilling to settle for anything else while the latter was happy to rely on his natural talent taking him as far as it could and that was good enough. What you point out IS a rugby issue, but it's not exclusively a rugby issue. I believe that both our rugby and football teams have the raw material (number of players, skill levels, etc.) to win World Cups but we simply lack the required mentality from the administration level right through to the playing level to achieve it. Only when we somehow put things in the hands of people who do have the right mentality do we see our potential being fulfilled. But when that happens, how many people really like our winners? Andy Murray is hardly popular. SCW is respected but not liked. Dave Brailsford is respected but considered a bit of a an oddity. Unlike, say, Americans, who simply celebrate success and the price paid to achieve it, we don't. They believe the price is worth paying. We feel like compromising your values to win is somehow a little bit dirty. And then we wonder why our teams fail. What we've really never done is made the mental transition from the amateur sports we have played for a century to the professional games which we play now. We've assumed that if we were world class amateurs in the old days, there's no reason we can't just be world class professionals now. But it doesn't work like that. Professionalism is a great leveler and we have failed across the board to adapt.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Phil H 06 Oct 15 10.33am | |
---|---|
This is an excellent analysis Syd. I think all of us golf lovers would add Sir Nick Faldo to the list of very "un-English" but ultimately successful achievers. Sir Nick wasn't exactly popular but boy did he get the job done.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 06 Oct 15 11.20am | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 06 Oct 2015 9.39am
Danny, in a lot of ways what you're saying -- and it's as true of the FA and Woy as it is of the RFU and Bomber -- is that we've failed because we've reverted to type and behaved like Englishmen. You know; conciliatory, polite, well-meaning, conservative, narrow-minded and a tiny bit self-impressed. We think we're better than we are. If you think about it, our major sporting successes in half a century have all (or at least mainly) come from teams or athletes that are extremely un-English. The 2003 rugby World Cup was driven by Sir Clive; a man who was egotistical, driven, totally uncompromising, and utterly determined. As were most of his players. He won the World Cup but polite little English administrators couldn't cope with him so now he's out in the cold. Our recent Tour de France and Olympic Cycling successes were driven by Dave Brailsford. Another arrogant, uncompromising and totally driven coach. Andy Murray...achieved success with foreign coaches who were proven winners and bases himself in the States. Oh, and guess what? He's arrogant, uncompromising, and totally driven. And so the list goes on. You get the picture. Notice a pattern here? The real truth is that the English mentality and persona is not suited to sporting success. We lack a cutting edge; we don't pursue becoming elite, we default to the safe option and, mainly, we just don't work hard enough. It's often said that Ronaldo and not Rooney became the best player in the world simply because the former was unwilling to settle for anything else while the latter was happy to rely on his natural talent taking him as far as it could and that was good enough. What you point out IS a rugby issue, but it's not exclusively a rugby issue. I believe that both our rugby and football teams have the raw material (number of players, skill levels, etc.) to win World Cups but we simply lack the required mentality from the administration level right through to the playing level to achieve it. Only when we somehow put things in the hands of people who do have the right mentality do we see our potential being fulfilled. But when that happens, how many people really like our winners? Andy Murray is hardly popular. SCW is respected but not liked. Dave Brailsford is respected but considered a bit of a an oddity. Unlike, say, Americans, who simply celebrate success and the price paid to achieve it, we don't. They believe the price is worth paying. We feel like compromising your values to win is somehow a little bit dirty. And then we wonder why our teams fail. What we've really never done is made the mental transition from the amateur sports we have played for a century to the professional games which we play now. We've assumed that if we were world class amateurs in the old days, there's no reason we can't just be world class professionals now. But it doesn't work like that. Professionalism is a great leveler and we have failed across the board to adapt.
We seem to think putting a few pithy motivational phrases from Vince Lombardi on a dressing room wall creates a winning mentality (or a bit of Sun Tzu's Art of War on a full sleeve tattoo as far as football is concerned)...it doesn't. I read a great little piece the other day. When Shankly was in negotiations with Liverpool, (board and chairman) who were trying to prise him from Huddersfield, he insisted so many criteria being met before he would come in around how the club was run and was basically a totally uncompromising b****** on absolutely everything, all in a time when chairman and board were kings and manager did as they were told...he got his way. He knew that he needed to imprint his own mentality and stamp on the club and the rest is history... On a plus side I am actually quite relieved that I can watch the world cup without an 'interest' other than the game - bit perverse that but quite a nice feeling. Southern Hemisphere sides to lose without question. We in the North are so far behind Saffers, AB's ands Aussies its unreal - We will be struggling behind Argentina soon given the steps they are taking to improve their players as well... Edited by The Sash (06 Oct 2015 11.48am)
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 06 Oct 15 11.59am | |
---|---|
Quote The Sash at 06 Oct 2015 11.20am
On a plus side I am actually quite relieved that I can watch the world cup without an 'interest' other than the game - bit perverse that but quite a nice feeling. Edited by The Sash (06 Oct 2015 11.48am) I feel the same way. I managed to get a ticket for Twickenham on Saturday and I cannot wait. The experience of watching Wales vs. Australia simply for the rugby and without the emotional investment is a mouth-watering prospect. Tipuric and Warburton vs. Pocock and Hooper...I am really beside myself with anticipation. BTW for those interested, extra tickets to all the RWC games are constantly going on sale. Go to the website and hit refresh every hour or so and see what comes up. I got a 50 quid ticket at 10pm last night for the above.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 06 Oct 15 1.00pm | |
---|---|
Agree with all that Syd. Key points for me as to why we were utterly crap: No room for players outside the English Premiership. I mean FFS I listened to a james Haskell interview, and he was practising to be a DJ inbetween game and training, You are at a world cup you chump. You should be eating sleeping and s***ting rugby. No learning how to be a DJ you massive ponce. I know players need to relax but to come out during a world cup after a piss poor performance against wales and openly admitt your learning to DJ " at the moment" tells me all I need to know. I bet none of the welsh players were on the ones and two's before the game
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 07 Oct 15 7.59am | |
---|---|
I see Jake White has expressed an interest if Lancaster goes...and his brief comments are probably bang on the money Edited by The Sash (07 Oct 2015 8.00am)
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Percy of Peckham Eton Mess 07 Oct 15 8.38am | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 06 Oct 2015 11.59am
Quote The Sash at 06 Oct 2015 11.20am
On a plus side I am actually quite relieved that I can watch the world cup without an 'interest' other than the game - bit perverse that but quite a nice feeling. Edited by The Sash (06 Oct 2015 11.48am) I feel the same way. I managed to get a ticket for Twickenham on Saturday and I cannot wait. The experience of watching Wales vs. Australia simply for the rugby and without the emotional investment is a mouth-watering prospect. Tipuric and Warburton vs. Pocock and Hooper...I am really beside myself with anticipation. BTW for those interested, extra tickets to all the RWC games are constantly going on sale. Go to the website and hit refresh every hour or so and see what comes up. I got a 50 quid ticket at 10pm last night for the above. Good for you ...now it's game of the group and will be an opportunity to see if Wales are really a match for the likes of a very decent Oz team. I hope so! Edited by Percy of Peckham (07 Oct 2015 10.43am)
Denial is not just a river in Egypt! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.