This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Palace v Leeds match thread
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Spiderman  Horsham 08 Nov 20 8.00am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by CT Charlie
On the U.S. broadcast, they said that Eze's corner was his first of the season. Is that true? Was it his first free kick also? If both are true, one wonders if a player has ever chalked up an assist and a goal on his first two set-piece opportunities. Maybe first free kick but definitely not first corner Edited by Spiderman (08 Nov 2020 8.05am)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Spiderman Horsham 08 Nov 20 8.02am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Casual
I did wonder where was Dann for the goal? Not blaming him but we seemed a bit at 6s and 7swhich is unusual
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 08 Nov 20 8.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Really impressed by the strength of the Palace bench. Some very good personnel not even making it. Agreed
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Aray South London 08 Nov 20 8.09am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Casual
Great result. Ayew definitely more suited to us than Batshui . Eze was great. Good overall performance, think that Clyne bottled it for their goal, should have gone through the ball , think he was worried about giving a penalty away, poor decision. 4-1, that’s a hiding. good spot. he was the covering man and should have blocked it
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Daddyorc  Atlantic Highlands, NJ 08 Nov 20 9.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
Have the rules changed? It used to be you couldn’t be offside by a part of the body that couldn’t score, thus his shoulder (or upper arm now) had to be offside. Originally posted by EddieMac
His arm was offside because he was pointing. The rules were followed to a tee.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 08 Nov 20 9.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Daddyorc
Have the rules changed? It used to be you couldn’t be offside by a part of the body that couldn’t score, thus his shoulder (or upper arm now) had to be offside. You can now sore with the t-shirt section of your arm i.e upper arm/ shoulder. Sakho would have scored against Villa last season
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Phil’s Barber Crowborough 08 Nov 20 10.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
You can now sore with the t-shirt section of your arm i.e upper arm/ shoulder. Sakho would have scored against Villa last season Indeed but that one should’ve stood last season, it came off his shoulder/back not his upper arm, another shocking VAR decision.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tickled pink Cornwall 08 Nov 20 10.24am |
|
|---|---|
|
VAR was introduced to help the referee, it has gone way way beyond that, changing the rules again now will mean starting the whole season again because previous results will be wrong so we will have to watch this utter crap for the rest of the season, so games being ruined and results being ruined is what we have.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Phil’s Barber Crowborough 08 Nov 20 10.39am |
|
|---|---|
|
I know we won and I am delighted to have sealed a 4-1 victory and three points but I cannot help feeling that Leeds were robbed of a perfectly good goal and the injustices of VAR have to be highlighted for the benefit of all EPL teams in the long run. Shockley Park allegedly have finer lines than the ones we are shown on the TV (Why aren’t we shown those?!) but yesterday, on the visual from the VAR team, the line drawn on Nathaniel Clyne was clearly about 5-6 inches wrong, having been drawn from the inside of the sleeve and not the outside of the sleeve, which was also away from his body. This would have confirmed that Bamford was onside. There is also the position of Kouyate (partially obscured by Bamford) and even his furthest forward foot is goal side of Bamford, a line drawn from his left boot or the edge of his left hip would likely have also played Bamford on side. Edited by Phil’s Barber (08 Nov 2020 10.42am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Attachment: | Tickled pink Cornwall 08 Nov 20 10.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber
Indeed but that one should’ve stood last season, it came off his shoulder/back not his upper arm, another shocking VAR decision. Yes it was shocking and worse watching it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tickled pink Cornwall 08 Nov 20 10.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Phil’s Barber
I know we won and I am delighted to have sealed a 4-1 victory and three points but I cannot help feeling that Leeds were robbed of a perfectly good goal and the injustices of VAR have to be highlighted for the benefit of all EPL teams in the long run. Shockley Park allegedly have finer lines than the ones we are shown on the TV (Why aren’t we shown those?!) but yesterday, on the visual from the VAR team, the line drawn on Nathaniel Clyne was clearly about 5-6 inches wrong, having been drawn from the inside of the sleeve and not the outside of the sleeve, which was also away from his body. This would have confirmed that Bamford was onside. There is also the position of Kouyate (partially obscured by Bamford) and even his furthest forward foot is goal side of Bamford, a line drawn from his left boot or the edge of his left hip would likely have also played Bamford on side. Edited by Phil’s Barber (08 Nov 2020 10.42am) The game needs goals and it needs to encourage goals VAR should give the benefit of doubt to the attacking team also it should only be the object nearest the ground to help with drawing the line along the ground and that happens to be the foot, it is so bleeding obvious it hurts, using feet in pic you can see all three are in line so the attacking player gets it in my book. Edited by Tickled pink (08 Nov 2020 10.58am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
eagleman13  On The Road To Hell & Alicante 08 Nov 20 11.45am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by PA
You’re right but it won’t happen. Apparently you have to decide whether to be a ref or an assistant ref and you don’t ever then move to other role. So no Assistant Refs will ever be actual refs (in the Premier League that is) Edited by PA (07 Nov 2020 9.21pm) Sorry PA, you are very wide of the mark. The match official & the 4th official are of the same level, the 2 assistants are from reffing in lower leagues working their way up the ladder, so if good enough they will officiate at a higher level due to promotion. Now, with the EPL, its different set up, being that the 30 refs are professional, ie, paid a wage, EFL refs only get a fee. There are 10 Epl matches, on average, per w/e, therefore you will have 10 elite refs in the middle, 10 elite refs as 4th official & the other 10 either at Stockley Park with VAR or in the lower leagues reffing. IF, assistants want to become an elite ref, they have to 1: get promoted & 2: give up their work to enable them to join the elite refs.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.