To you perhaps it does however the same logic applies as to Brexit, those who voted Remain, did you:

1. Vote for the status quo. This means the UK will continue to have a fractious relationship with the EU as we will be continually vetoing or requesting op outs as the direction of the EU is now quite clear.

2. Vote for full membership of the EU including euro and Schengen. I have no problem with this position I don't agree with it but it is logical if we are going to be in a club we should embrace all it's rules so hopefully being proactive we can then shape those rule.

3. Vote for something in the middle of the above.

The EU is continuing to expand in countries and in the control it exerts over its members. Anybody who thinks we can carry on as before is naive.

Remaining in meant the same to everyone. It was crystal clear.

It meant not making any immediate changes. If in the future Parliament decided to join the Euro or Schengen areas or negotiate further opt outs, then that would doubtless spark a pretty lively debate and perhaps, who knows, another, hopefully clearly advisory, referendum. Such matters though are for future Parliaments to decide. The referendum result expressed no opinion on such things. Us keeping how we would remain, what we accept, what we reject and what we would persuade the EU to modify would be just a part of normal membership.

Voting to leave was, at face value, just as straight forward. It's only when the detail crawled out that the devil became obvious. Old Nick had been hiding in the shadows obscured by rhetoric and ignorance.

If we had voted to remain then all of this would have been a distant memory by now. Cameron would likely still be PM, Farage would still be bleating but his base would have tired of it because they would have no-where to go. Corbyn would have been replaced because the failure of the leftwards swing of the Labour Party would be seen as a disaster. It's only the swing to the right of the Tories that has given Labour a lift and re-energised the LibDems.

As what I am suggesting would produce exactly the same result as what you are, but without the need for the cost, trouble or delay of another referendum then what would be the point?

That's the purpose of a single transferable vote system. It ought to be used for GEs too so that a majority of the people feel they have voted, in some way, for the final choice. Having governments formed by first past the post often results in only 35% of the people choosing who they are. That's one of the primary reasons people have lost confidence in our Parliamentary system.

What on earth has my last post got to do with "remain" let alone being "propaganda"?

It was solely about the single transferable vote system and how it might actually benefit those who want to leave.

However if it sends you to sleep then I am happy for you. I am knee deep in my tax returns and it's having the same effect.

How do I know?

You have only to listen to people to know that. Anyone who thinks otherwise is in denial of reality.

Yes it was a simple question. Which is the whole problem. Complex matters cannot be answered with a simple yes, or no to a simple question.