This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Oct 16 11.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by OknotOK
He is indeed a lying bag of s***e, the trouble is so is she. Fortunately she does have some knowledge of foreign and domestic policy. But I can see why people would be reticent to vote for more of the same in her. People obviously feel that the rich are getting richer and the middle classes in America are getting left behind. I just don't understand why their solution would be to vote for an old, fat, white man who only succeeded in life because his father left him a fortune (and continued to provide him funding when he was failing) Its a bit like having to take one for the team, or be raped. Either way, you're being violated. its just a question of what kind of horrible experience you have to recover from.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 11 Oct 16 12.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Trump wouldn't be my choice but I'm hoping he wins personally. With the congress and the house he isn't going to get the more controversial elements of his programme through anyway. The problem with Clinton is what comes with her. It's the 'white privilege' guilt, the 'black lives matter' victim-hood, the third wave feminism doctrine, the anti police disposition.....It's that section of the left that want to get people sacked or censor the non violent views of those they don't like. I can't stand these people and I don't wish them on America for four years. This is the main reason why ordinary people are entertaining voting for such a character as Trump. They, like Brexit voters, are sick and tired of the way our societies are going. The interests of the majority are being sacrificed.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 11 Oct 16 12.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
This is the main reason why ordinary people are entertaining voting for such a character as Trump. They, like Brexit voters, are sick and tired of the way our societies are going. The interests of the majority are being sacrificed. Yeah but what Brexit and Trump have shown is that the majority will listen to rhetoric and populism over research/scientific/fact based evidence. And that's a pretty scary place to me. Common sense and rationale seems to have lost its place in politics.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 11 Oct 16 12.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Yeah but what Brexit and Trump have shown is that the majority will listen to rhetoric and populism over research/scientific/fact based evidence. And that's a pretty scary place to me. Common sense and rationale seems to have lost its place in politics. The latest mantra from the liberal/left. The "facts" you are interested in clearly differ from the majority. I believe the correct term is denial.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 11 Oct 16 12.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Yeah but what Brexit and Trump have shown is that the majority will listen to rhetoric and populism over research/scientific/fact based evidence. And that's a pretty scary place to me. Common sense and rationale seems to have lost its place in politics. There were, and there are, no facts on either side. It's all bulls***. Where's the higher interest rates, lower house prices, mass unemployment and all that we were told would follow a vote to leave?
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 11 Oct 16 12.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Yeah but what Brexit and Trump have shown is that the majority will listen to rhetoric and populism over research/scientific/fact based evidence. And that's a pretty scary place to me. Common sense and rationale seems to have lost its place in politics. Dan... Brexit has shown up so called research/scientific/fact based evidence from the so called "Eminent Economists" once again, just as I predicted it would looking at their forecasts of doom for the £ v Euro debate. They told us that markets would be in turmoil immediately due to the uncertainty. Yes the £ dropped in value and for a few days the FTSE100 was down. But 3 months in the £ devaluing is helping our exports and the FTSE100 is nearly at an all time high. I'd say commonsense and rationale prevails. It makes more sense to me to close our borders and regain our sovereignty rather than opening the door wider and allowing unelected bureaucrats to govern us. Still... the full effects of Brexit are yet to be tested so calling it good or bad at this stage is premature. Lets revisit this next march/april after we have invoked article 50. Edited by Hoof Hearted (11 Oct 2016 12.48pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 11 Oct 16 12.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
Dan... Brexit has shown up so called research/scientific/fact based evidence from the so called "Eminent Economists" once again, just as I predicted it would looking at their forecasts of doom for the £ v Euro debate. They told us that markets would be in turmoil immediately due to the uncertainty. Yes the £ dropped in value and for a few days the FTSE100 was down. But 3 months in the £ devaluing is helping our exports and the FTSE100 is nearly at an all time high. I'd say commonsense and rationale prevails. It makes more sense to me to close our borders and regain our sovereignty rather than opening the door wider and allowing unelected bureaucrats to govern us. Still... the full effects of Brexit are yet to be tested so calling it good or bad at this stage is premature. Lets revisit this next march/april after we have invoked article 50. Edited by Hoof Hearted (11 Oct 2016 12.48pm) I'm glad you covered yourself at the end! Brexit hasn't even begun yet so once the playing field is set out in the next couple of years we'll only know the effect. It wasn't so much the act of Brexit I was referring to anyway; more so the approach taken to get there taken by politicians spouting half truths at best, and downright lies at worst in order to get people to vote one way or another. Trump is doing the same with his campaign. I'm a firm believer in those that are actually educated and experienced in their field should be the ones that shape policy, not politicians. But then that makes far too much common sense. Edited by DanH (11 Oct 2016 12.59pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Oct 16 1.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
This is the main reason why ordinary people are entertaining voting for such a character as Trump. They, like Brexit voters, are sick and tired of the way our societies are going. The interests of the majority are being sacrificed. I love the fact there is no middle ground. I think its pretty clear that there are significant gender, racial and policing issues, that need to be addressed but there is always the 'na-na-na' if I don't listen it can't be real. They're also determinable inequalities that can be scientifically demonstrated. Granted no one should feel guilty for being in the majority, but they also need to understand that there are significant issues around these subjects. Whilst I don't subscribe to the 'accept everything', just ignoring issues and groups in society, because they're in the minority, is equally absurd.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 11 Oct 16 1.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
I'm glad you covered yourself at the end! Brexit hasn't even begun yet so once the playing field is set out in the next couple of years we'll only know the effect. It wasn't so much the act of Brexit I was referring to anyway; more so the approach taken to get there taken by politicians spouting half truths at best, and downright lies at worst in order to get people to vote one way or another. Trump is doing the same with his campaign. I'm a firm believer in those that are actually educated and experienced in their field should be the ones that shape policy, not politicians. But then that makes far too much common sense. I'm too old and busy to take this task on now Dan, but I'm happy to leave it with Boris and Foxxy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Oct 16 1.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The latest mantra from the liberal/left. The "facts" you are interested in clearly differ from the majority. I believe the correct term is denial. Depends, on whether the facts are correct or not. I've seen a lot of research, including the governments own, that demonstrates that women and racial groups experience a significantly determined degree of prejudice in terms of employment, wages, legal treatment from law enforcement and so on. Granted, Black Lives have it wrong, they're not singled out specifically for more aggressive policing specifically on race, its a issue of being poor. Plenty of unarmed white and Hispanics experience excessive and lethal force at the hands on US police. Some see this as 'justification' - its not racial so its fair, but its still a frighteningly high level of excessive violence and use of lethal force, in very questionable circumstances. For me, it doesn't matter if its racial, class, gender, if you're shooting unarmed suspects and its not creating a issue for law enforcement you have a serious social problem.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Oct 16 1.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
I'm glad you covered yourself at the end! Brexit hasn't even begun yet so once the playing field is set out in the next couple of years we'll only know the effect. It wasn't so much the act of Brexit I was referring to anyway; more so the approach taken to get there taken by politicians spouting half truths at best, and downright lies at worst in order to get people to vote one way or another. Trump is doing the same with his campaign. I'm a firm believer in those that are actually educated and experienced in their field should be the ones that shape policy, not politicians. But then that makes far too much common sense. Edited by DanH (11 Oct 2016 12.59pm) I think the issue is more that politicians in the UK and US aren't representing the people, at all, but the interests of corporate entities and lobby groups. I think you need both. Independent or conflicting Expert think tanks that present arguments, and someone who represents the people. My concern is more when experts are ignored or sacked because their advice isn't politically aligned with the governments. because that ends up with governments who aren't prepaired to 'make unpopular decisions' that can be argued to be in societies benefit - In fact they won't even associate themselves with those arguments and present them to the electorate. Its why our criminal justice system is crumbling and failing, because we spend too much time on trying to do what people want, rather than what works.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 11 Oct 16 1.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I love the fact there is no middle ground. I think its pretty clear that there are significant gender, racial and policing issues, that need to be addressed but there is always the 'na-na-na' if I don't listen it can't be real. They're also determinable inequalities that can be scientifically demonstrated. Granted no one should feel guilty for being in the majority, but they also need to understand that there are significant issues around these subjects. Whilst I don't subscribe to the 'accept everything', just ignoring issues and groups in society, because they're in the minority, is equally absurd. You are correct of course but what we have here is political parties and candidates jumping on any cause that appeals to their targeted voters, none of which they actually care about. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (11 Oct 2016 1.24pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.