So that’s a no then.

It's hardly surprising that within a country which is still.....currently 75-80 percent white the number of child abusers would numerically be majority white.

What the relevant statistic is the percentage of abuse within each community.

The fact that our institutions have been afraid to robustly tackle the abuse is completely and utterly the fault of social liberals who have screamed 'racism' for any criticism or action taken against their 'protected group'.

Look at how the Labour party treated Sarah Champion when she tried to speak common sense. Even from within their own party it's heresy to actually lift the lid and peek...The Labour party are more Islamophillic than they are antisemitic.

It was always going to happen. It's displaced empathy over common sense...That's how they insisted the public service institutions respond...and it's still deeply ingrained.....With these services it's all about arse covering, appeasement and avoiding complaints from 'protected' communities rather than actually protecting the vulnerable.

The level of abuse from select communities isn't only confined to these grooming gangs who target the vulnerable girls that the white community have abandoned......No, familiy abuse also occurs behind their own doors.

But the social liberals and their 'protection' have abandoned these girls and boys as well....Also many of them ignore and even verbally attack the vulnerable within that community like atheists, apostates or gays.

All this than that rather be called a racist......These people disgust me. They think they are good people but in reality they are complicit.....They have responsibility for the culture but any number of excuses....Their leaders are responsible for the, 'go along to get along' institutions but they are responsible for the cheer leading.

Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jan 2020 4.26pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Indeed, he's on record on the site for defending the Police's actions in keeping this quiet.....amongst other institution defending statements on this issue....Essentially, because he wasn't there, he feels he can't comment. Even though it doesn't cause him much issue with anything else.

He even stated he'd heard about something about this 20 years ago.

He has zero credibility on this issue and is part of the ideological problem.

Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jan 2020 4.51pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

It's a no to commenting on anything other than the video for the reasons I stated very clearly.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

To repeat. The referenced video had nothing at all to do with the subject of the thread.

When it's central premise (that there are open borders) is a lie, everything that follows is too. It was by an American about the alleged situation in the USA which adds to it's irrelevance.

I am not getting involved in another pointless debate about "grooming gangs" and how we either have, or should, handle them. My views are constantly misrepresented here and are once again in another response from the usual suspect, despite me posting comprehensive and very clear clarifications several times.

It seems some people are more interested in posting character assassinations than engaging in any kind of objective, balanced and respectful conversation about a serious subject.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The grooming gang scandal is THE reason Labour got their ass kicked in their old industrial heartland.

plus Corbyn having all the charisma and cuddly demeanour of a spider crab.

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford