I have no idea what set you off in the first place, but you don't know me and you really don't know what I know of 9/11, so you shouldn't be bandying around unfounded insults...THAT's Trump.

As to the rest of it, if you want to boil down the myriad complications of international relations to a zero-sum equation, go ahead. You'll be wrong, but I have zero interest in helping you.

We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

I am pretty sure it was in the Eire.

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

She's laughing about her faith in polygraph machines, not about the rape. Lawyers who defend terrible people probably do develop a kind of dark humour to get through what is effectively a pretty s**ty but necessary job.

As for getting him off, you can't have a fair trial if you have a lawyer who isn't prepared to defend you in an accusatory prosecution system.

Friend of mine is a forensic anthropologist who specialises in arson and finding and recovering dead bodies (typically murder victims). He has a very dark and blasé sense of humour about his work. Its often the only way to get through it.

And of course this is something she said in 1975, 31 years ago.

Edited by jamiemartin721 (12 Aug 2016 12.45pm)

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Well worth a watch to see what kind of person she is:

[Link]

"Hillary Clinton lying for 13 minutes straight"

Quite - the only candidate that I think had any real credibility as a person and political integrity, was Saunders (whether you liked his politics or not, his record pretty much seems impressive and consistent).

These two, its another lesser of two evils scenario. Neither is fit for the job.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

And Hilary is probably a bucket.

I actually believe Colonel Sanders (if he even existed - I believe it was some pseudonym) sold KFC recently enough and his parting shot was something along the lines of 'that is the worst food I've ever tasted; if you can even call it food'. I shouldn't quote it really as I haven't got the words as harsh as he had at all.

Anyway - one point I think we can all agree on is this: both are terrible candidates, even questionable people, what exactly is happening to supposed democracy these days? Just seems to go from the sublime to the ridiculous. Perhaps Colonel Sanders vs Ronald McDonald for the next election is not that far-fetched.
I also want to state that this is not only in the US but seems to be a worldwide phenomenon in our great democracies. Look at the recent Italian and French candidates, look at the British candidates, if you can be bothered look at the Irish leader - he is a joke of a cross-dressing fool.

Red and Blue Army!