This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
elgrande bedford 13 Sep 17 3.16pm | |
---|---|
I can't remember which bank/financial company it was,but I saw a programme a few months back where they were fronting the costs for building social housing,and then leasing them to the local councils.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Sep 17 4.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
What kind of future is this? Talk about accepting lower standards for the coming generation. We have to find a different ways of tackling the population and housing problems. But that won't happen because essentially....agendas. Even in Blade Runner the apartments seem very spacey. Its bad enough how small a new build one bedroomed house is, let alone having people living effectively in what amounts to student halls and Travelodge cells.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pete53 Hassocks 13 Sep 17 4.26pm | |
---|---|
Yes, just think if we could also get people to sleep strapped in an upright position you could save all that space that a bed takes up. Edited by Pete53 (13 Sep 2017 4.27pm) Edited by Pete53 (13 Sep 2017 4.27pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 14 Sep 17 12.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by elgrande
I can't remember which bank/financial company it was,but I saw a programme a few months back where they were fronting the costs for building social housing,and then leasing them to the local councils. .........Or rather they do have the money, but decide to splurge it all on useless other projects.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Sep 17 12.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pete53
Yes, just think if we could also get people to sleep strapped in an upright position you could save all that space that a bed takes up. Edited by Pete53 (13 Sep 2017 4.27pm) Edited by Pete53 (13 Sep 2017 4.27pm) Shelves. That's the answer. Lots of em.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 14 Sep 17 7.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
These will indeed be the dystopian slums of the future if we're not careful. Demand drives price, and whilst initially cheap, these will only ever be slightly cheaper than the absurdly high rental prices for property in London. Its no different than all those tiny one bedroom box houses they built in the 90s that were cheap housing, and then simply became to expensive for most people to buy, because the prices of housing was ridiculous. The solution really lies in controlling the housing market, and property availability and affordability - not in producing just more product into the market. Government cannot keep avoiding making that tough decision, just on the basis of protecting their popularity - the experiment in 'home ownership' has become a total f**king disaster. trouble is, on a 5 year political cycle, most Governments have given the issue a wide swerve. The system is so totally fcked now, that no-one will have the balls to tackle it
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 14 Sep 17 8.29am | |
---|---|
and just to add, affordable housing should not mean it's a total pile of shlt. Government won't sort the housing issue, so the Free-market will prevail on whether micro-homes are the future.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 14 Sep 17 8.57am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
What kind of future is this? Talk about accepting lower standards for the coming generation. We have to find a different ways of tackling the population and housing problems. But that won't happen because essentially....agendas. This.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 14 Sep 17 8.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Shelves. That's the answer. Lots of em.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 14 Sep 17 9.46am | |
---|---|
My brother and his wife live on a canal boat, this is a life style choice. He also works for a company that sells them. It used to be well off and or retired people who bought for leisure activities. Today it tends to be young people who buy as a place to live. He is in the Midlands, they sail the boats back to London. I was at Lee Valley recently and saw several hundred moored up. You can buy a second hand boat for between £30-50,000 they are warm and comfortable and have a resale value as long as you look after them. Mooring fees will depend on where you are but £3-5000 pa is typical. As I said in my previous post we have to get imaginative. Whether its a micro flat, a boat or a prefab (see Ladywell for the new types). In a perfect world the population would be smaller and social housing would be palaces but we have to start somewhere. The bedroom tax may offend many people but is it right that a single person lives in a three bedroom council house whilst young people are homeless or are in overcrowded accommodation? The tax may not be the answer maybe it should be a carrot but I do think we need to encourage downsizing in social housing. Many people who own their homes downsize as they get older. Bottom line I feel sorry for young people today and housing is a mess. The politicians need to get real and come up with policies that most parties can live with. UKIP focused the main parties on the EU question for better or for worse. Maybe we need a Social Housing party to force this agenda.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 14 Sep 17 10.01am | |
---|---|
A company in Sydney constructs modular/pre fab accommodation above state owned buildings - very little disruption - for nurses and essential workers and suchlike, and at affordable rent costs, to ease their housing problems. Working a treat.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Beanyboysmd 14 Sep 17 10.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That is the bottom line. Agreed, even the most hardline right winger has to admit that if property was affordable, much fewer people would need council housing, which would in turn save the government a fortune. Hoping agencies and developers will do the right thing and build cheaper housing is just insanity. Left to it they will just come up with diabolical ideas like this one...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.