You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Mother Teresa to become a saint
November 23 2024 5.29pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Mother Teresa to become a saint

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 2 << First< 1 2

  

EaglesEaglesEagles Flag 20 Dec 15 12.34pm Send a Private Message to EaglesEaglesEagles Add EaglesEaglesEagles as a friend

I don't know why people are really bothered if Mother Teresa's going to be made a Saint.

The only people who will care are Catholics because that's the only church (apart from in some cases the Orthodox) who care about canonization.
It's an entirely religious title with no secular recognition or significance.

So if people think she was a dreadful person who did more harm to the poor than good, this won't affect that or the reach of the movement promoting this idea (Christopher Hitchens' videos for example). The same goes for people who think she was great.

This thread is just a moaning session which has been activated by Mother Teresa's canonization consideration in the news. The fact that she's going to be made a Saint is secondary.
It's fine to have a moan and express opinions. I dislike Christopher Hitchens' rhetoric (sorry Hitch fans). It's fine that I have that opinion.

Point being that her becoming a Saint won't really bring about anything new, she's been a 'blessed' for years after all. For non-Catholics it's just a reminder of the Church's absurd, pseudo-religious and nonsensical practices. Big deal.

 


I ain't got nuthin' funny to say. Sorry.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 20 Dec 15 12.41pm

Quote EaglesEaglesEagles at 20 Dec 2015 12.34pm

I don't know why people are really bothered if Mother Teresa's going to be made a Saint.

The only people who will care are Catholics because that's the only church (apart from in some cases the Orthodox) who care about canonization.
It's an entirely religious title with no secular recognition or significance.

So if people think she was a dreadful person who did more harm to the poor than good, this won't affect that or the reach of the movement promoting this idea (Christopher Hitchens' videos for example). The same goes for people who think she was great.

This thread is just a moaning session which has been activated by Mother Teresa's canonization consideration in the news. The fact that she's going to be made a Saint is secondary.
It's fine to have a moan and express opinions. I dislike Christopher Hitchens' rhetoric (sorry Hitch fans). It's fine that I have that opinion.

Point being that her becoming a Saint won't really bring about anything new, she's been a 'blessed' for years after all. For non-Catholics it's just a reminder of the Church's absurd, pseudo-religious and nonsensical practices. Big deal.


I refer you to my post - the very first reply to the thread!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Mad4palace Flag 20 Dec 15 1.20pm Send a Private Message to Mad4palace Add Mad4palace as a friend

Quote NickRobinson at 20 Dec 2015 11.28am

Quote Mad4palace at 19 Dec 2015 9.51pm

Quote NickRobinson at 19 Dec 2015 8.19pm

She did a lot of good. She deserves recognition. What harm does it do calling her a saint?

She pretended to do a lot of good.

So she 'pretended' to found the Missionaries of Charity, active in 133 countries. They run hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis; soup kitchens; dispensaries and mobile clinics; children's and family counselling programmes; orphanages; and schools. All a sham then?

The motive behind her work was devotional, it wasn't to alleviate suffering it was to wallow in it and perversely see it as a gift. The poor standards of medical care, allegations of misusing of funds and her opposition to concraception sort of gives one the indication that she was more obsessed with working for 'god' and the politics of her religion, rather than the poor or sick.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NickRobinson Flag 20 Dec 15 1.41pm

Quote Mad4palace at 20 Dec 2015 1.20pm

Quote NickRobinson at 20 Dec 2015 11.28am

Quote Mad4palace at 19 Dec 2015 9.51pm

Quote NickRobinson at 19 Dec 2015 8.19pm

She did a lot of good. She deserves recognition. What harm does it do calling her a saint?

She pretended to do a lot of good.

So she 'pretended' to found the Missionaries of Charity, active in 133 countries. They run hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis; soup kitchens; dispensaries and mobile clinics; children's and family counselling programmes; orphanages; and schools. All a sham then?

The motive behind her work was devotional, it wasn't to alleviate suffering it was to wallow in it and perversely see it as a gift. The poor standards of medical care, allegations of misusing of funds and her opposition to concraception sort of gives one the indication that she was more obsessed with working for 'god' and the politics of her religion, rather than the poor or sick.

So the 'untouchables' in India would have been better off without her then? "Poor standards" - at least she took practical steps to help people whatever her motives. I'm not religious, but recognise people doing good when I see it. A lot of the people that criticise her for helping people, do so because of her religious convictions. If, say Nelson Mandella, had set up similar help-organisations, the same critics would be hailing him as a 'saint', albeit a secular one.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 20 Dec 15 3.19pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote NickRobinson at 20 Dec 2015 1.41pm

Quote Mad4palace at 20 Dec 2015 1.20pm

Quote NickRobinson at 20 Dec 2015 11.28am

Quote Mad4palace at 19 Dec 2015 9.51pm

Quote NickRobinson at 19 Dec 2015 8.19pm

She did a lot of good. She deserves recognition. What harm does it do calling her a saint?

She pretended to do a lot of good.

So she 'pretended' to found the Missionaries of Charity, active in 133 countries. They run hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis; soup kitchens; dispensaries and mobile clinics; children's and family counselling programmes; orphanages; and schools. All a sham then?

The motive behind her work was devotional, it wasn't to alleviate suffering it was to wallow in it and perversely see it as a gift. The poor standards of medical care, allegations of misusing of funds and her opposition to concraception sort of gives one the indication that she was more obsessed with working for 'god' and the politics of her religion, rather than the poor or sick.

So the 'untouchables' in India would have been better off without her then? "Poor standards" - at least she took practical steps to help people whatever her motives. I'm not religious, but recognise people doing good when I see it. A lot of the people that criticise her for helping people, do so because of her religious convictions. If, say Nelson Mandella, had set up similar help-organisations, the same critics would be hailing him as a 'saint', albeit a secular one.


Selfless acts are their own reward. They do not require recognition because those seeking it are not really committing selfless acts.

Besides that, all talk of saints is just medieval religious mumbo jumbo, and it is shameful that the Catholic church, or any other, perpetuates such superstitious garbage.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EaglesEaglesEagles Flag 20 Dec 15 6.57pm Send a Private Message to EaglesEaglesEagles Add EaglesEaglesEagles as a friend

Quote Hoof Hearted at 20 Dec 2015 12.41pm

Quote EaglesEaglesEagles at 20 Dec 2015 12.34pm

I don't know why people are really bothered if Mother Teresa's going to be made a Saint.

The only people who will care are Catholics because that's the only church (apart from in some cases the Orthodox) who care about canonization.
It's an entirely religious title with no secular recognition or significance.

So if people think she was a dreadful person who did more harm to the poor than good, this won't affect that or the reach of the movement promoting this idea (Christopher Hitchens' videos for example). The same goes for people who think she was great.

This thread is just a moaning session which has been activated by Mother Teresa's canonization consideration in the news. The fact that she's going to be made a Saint is secondary.
It's fine to have a moan and express opinions. I dislike Christopher Hitchens' rhetoric (sorry Hitch fans). It's fine that I have that opinion.

Point being that her becoming a Saint won't really bring about anything new, she's been a 'blessed' for years after all. For non-Catholics it's just a reminder of the Church's absurd, pseudo-religious and nonsensical practices. Big deal.


I refer you to my post - the very first reply to the thread!

Fair. I was reiterating what others had ignored for the sake of enjoying their own annoyance. I may have perhaps even enjoyed my own self-righteousness of effectively expanding upon what you said!

 


I ain't got nuthin' funny to say. Sorry.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 2 << First< 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Mother Teresa to become a saint