This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Pawson Palace Croydon 06 Nov 15 11.38am | |
---|---|
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Yup. Smashing up someone else's property is wrong in my opinion 100%.
Pride of South London |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 06 Nov 15 11.40am | |
---|---|
Quote Pawson Palace at 06 Nov 2015 11.38am
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Yup. Smashing up someone else's property is wrong in my opinion 100%. I'd say smashing up someone's private property is about 75% wrong, but then some people sometimes have it coming. As for certain company property, in the right circumstances it can be the right thing to do.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
collier row eagle romford essex via another galaxy 06 Nov 15 11.43am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Nov 2015 11.40am
Quote Pawson Palace at 06 Nov 2015 11.38am
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Yup. Smashing up someone else's property is wrong in my opinion 100%. I'd say smashing up someone's private property is about 75% wrong, but then some people sometimes have it coming. As for certain company property, in the right circumstances it can be the right thing to do. In what circumstances would that be?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 06 Nov 15 11.43am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Nov 2015 11.40am
Quote Pawson Palace at 06 Nov 2015 11.38am
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Yup. Smashing up someone else's property is wrong in my opinion 100%. I'd say smashing up someone's private property is about 75% wrong, but then some people sometimes have it coming. As for certain company property, in the right circumstances it can be the right thing to do. Did anyone ever find Leicester's flags?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 06 Nov 15 11.44am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Nov 2015 11.40am
Quote Pawson Palace at 06 Nov 2015 11.38am
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Yup. Smashing up someone else's property is wrong in my opinion 100%. I'd say smashing up someone's private property is about 75% wrong, but then some people sometimes have it coming. As for certain company property, in the right circumstances it can be the right thing to do. You are kidding ? An example please.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mr Fenandes 06 Nov 15 11.47am | |
---|---|
Quote stevegood at 06 Nov 2015 11.32am
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Do you approve of the protestors' actions? I don't approve of some of the protesters actions no, the same way I don't approve of football hooliganism and being tarred with the same brush as a few who misbehave. Remember how society felt about footie fans in the 80's. It's lazy, it avoids the real issues at hand, and it makes it very easy to dismiss when your media is hell-bent on giving the coverage it does. Same with the student protests. Easy to then go "dirty unwashed c***s" and move on. The police's actions and tactics are never taken in to account. They don't even hide it and actually call it kettling. What happens to the contents of a kettle?
Check out our Croydon-based football comedy series 'Road to F.A. Cup'! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 06 Nov 15 11.52am | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 06 Nov 2015 11.44am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Nov 2015 11.40am
Quote Pawson Palace at 06 Nov 2015 11.38am
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Yup. Smashing up someone else's property is wrong in my opinion 100%. I'd say smashing up someone's private property is about 75% wrong, but then some people sometimes have it coming. As for certain company property, in the right circumstances it can be the right thing to do. You are kidding ? An example please. Seemed ok for the police at Beanfield.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 06 Nov 15 11.55am | |
---|---|
I thought they were supposed to be 'pro democracy' but you'd be excused for not knowing what their point is when they don't have a clue. Reading the website I really struggle to make sense of it. It seems to surround revolt and upsetting the system I can only presume for the sake of anarchy's as there's no reference to a better system. It really annoys me when everyone has their own justification for behaving like a cnut and cumulatively manage to legitimise it on the grounds of everything the government has done from Iraq to 'raping' dead pigs. Then you've got the alleged police cover-ups of 70s abuse making them fair game too. This seems to be the format for most protests going back to the 2011 riots. Any excuse. I'd guess the end goal is to undermine the police further by provoking a heavy-handed response. This obviously mobilises more protesters and validates any ideas of oppression. The media seems to be another focus but that goes back to anti capitalism and Murdoch owning x% of outlets. It's ironic that we've never had more choice of source than we've had now. There's too much self righteous bulls*** where hating anyone with money or power is seen as honourable. Most the time it's about as senseless as blaming immigrants for everything. Edited by johnfirewall (06 Nov 2015 12.00pm) Edited by johnfirewall (06 Nov 2015 12.03pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 06 Nov 15 11.57am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Nov 2015 11.52am
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 06 Nov 2015 11.44am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Nov 2015 11.40am
Quote Pawson Palace at 06 Nov 2015 11.38am
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Yup. Smashing up someone else's property is wrong in my opinion 100%. I'd say smashing up someone's private property is about 75% wrong, but then some people sometimes have it coming. As for certain company property, in the right circumstances it can be the right thing to do. You are kidding ? An example please. Seemed ok for the police at Beanfield. Two wrongs...... And in any case they is not a fair comparison. Nice swerve.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 06 Nov 15 12.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Nov 2015 11.40am
Quote Pawson Palace at 06 Nov 2015 11.38am
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day. Yup. Smashing up someone else's property is wrong in my opinion 100%. I'd say smashing up someone's private property is about 75% wrong, but then some people sometimes have it coming. As for certain company property, in the right circumstances it can be the right thing to do.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 06 Nov 15 12.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote Mr Fenandes at 06 Nov 2015 11.28am
Must be really comfortable waking up every morning, reading whatever your rag of choice is and going "yep, that's 100% my opinion. Glad I don't have to look in to this any further as all the information I need is right here" and carrying that around with you all day.
Act like a thug and don't be surprised if people take exception. How do you think the person in the car felt? flashing lights (probably very difficult to see) and surrounded by masked protagonists who were tring to stop them form leaving? Go on justify what they were doing
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mr Fenandes 06 Nov 15 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnfirewall at 06 Nov 2015 11.55am
There's too much self righteous bulls*** where hating anyone with money or power is seen as honourable. Most the time it's about as senseless as blaming immigrants for everything. There is most certainly an element to that for sure and I can certainly understand the perception that there are those who are just looking to be angry and cause trouble, because it's true. But there are also those who see things like Goldman Sach's "advising" the government to sell the Post Office for half its value; then buying 50% of the stock and selling for double the price less than a week later. That's insider trading, there is no getting away from that. The definition of pillaging and an absolute disgrace, it should have been on of the biggest scandals of the year. Absolutely nothing. So on the other side of the coin, I can see why the elite rich have no credibility with these groups.
Check out our Croydon-based football comedy series 'Road to F.A. Cup'! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.