You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Labours Economic Policy U Turn !
November 23 2024 7.32pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Labours Economic Policy U Turn !

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

We are goin up! Flag Coulsdon 13 Oct 15 12.07pm Send a Private Message to We are goin up! Add We are goin up! as a friend

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 11.50am

What's all the fuss about?

Firstly, the Conservative 'surplus' pledge is a nothing more than a legitimisation device to get yet more draconian pieces of 'social engineering' through Parliament. It is also a mean spirited target which enables the 'Out' camp to point at the money going to Europe as a cause rather than effect of our econmic impotence.

A couple of right-wingers in the party don't like it?
Didums has lost his dummy....
A purge of these faux-Tory careerist MP's is the best thing that could happen....toddle off to another party if socialism is that unpalatable.

Diane Abbott...Ha Ha....she's just a better camouflaged self-centered careerist who's really not as 'left' as sh'd like us to believe.

Obviously the re-birth of a proper Labour Party based on Socialist Values is going to be messy. Once they put the Blairites out of harms way - whether by de-selection or by imposing discipline - then a consesus policy porfolio can be followed. Untill then, every issue will be devisive, every debate will drive away some careerist hanger-on or closit Tory.

Nobody should expect this to be anything other than a barely concealed internal civil-war but there is no room in Corbyn's Labour for anybody who is not willing to dump the post-Thatcher emphasis on Corporate interest in favour of a re-statement of political purpose as champions of the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited in our society.

Make no mistake, the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited make up a very large segment of British society and one that is continually growing thanks to Osborne and chums.

The Tories are a grand recruiting sargeant for Labour.


In your weird world the general election never happened, did it?

 


The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ghosteagle Flag 13 Oct 15 12.11pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 11.50am

What's all the fuss about?

Firstly, the Conservative 'surplus' pledge is a nothing more than a legitimisation device to get yet more draconian pieces of 'social engineering' through Parliament. It is also a mean spirited target which enables the 'Out' camp to point at the money going to Europe as a cause rather than effect of our econmic impotence.

A couple of right-wingers in the party don't like it?
Didums has lost his dummy....
A purge of these faux-Tory careerist MP's is the best thing that could happen....toddle off to another party if socialism is that unpalatable.

Diane Abbott...Ha Ha....she's just a better camouflaged self-centered careerist who's really not as 'left' as sh'd like us to believe.

Obviously the re-birth of a proper Labour Party based on Socialist Values is going to be messy. Once they put the Blairites out of harms way - whether by de-selection or by imposing discipline - then a consesus policy porfolio can be followed. Untill then, every issue will be devisive, every debate will drive away some careerist hanger-on or closit Tory.

Nobody should expect this to be anything other than a barely concealed internal civil-war but there is no room in Corbyn's Labour for anybody who is not willing to dump the post-Thatcher emphasis on Corporate interest in favour of a re-statement of political purpose as champions of the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited in our society.

Make no mistake, the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited make up a very large segment of British society and one that is continually growing thanks to Osborne and chums.

The Tories are a grand recruiting sargeant for Labour.


While this is true, it is politicising these sections of society that is the challenge for the labour party.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Oct 15 12.42pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 11.50am

What's all the fuss about?

Firstly, the Conservative 'surplus' pledge is a nothing more than a legitimisation device to get yet more draconian pieces of 'social engineering' through Parliament. It is also a mean spirited target which enables the 'Out' camp to point at the money going to Europe as a cause rather than effect of our econmic impotence.

A couple of right-wingers in the party don't like it?
Didums has lost his dummy....
A purge of these faux-Tory careerist MP's is the best thing that could happen....toddle off to another party if socialism is that unpalatable.

Diane Abbott...Ha Ha....she's just a better camouflaged self-centered careerist who's really not as 'left' as sh'd like us to believe.

Obviously the re-birth of a proper Labour Party based on Socialist Values is going to be messy. Once they put the Blairites out of harms way - whether by de-selection or by imposing discipline - then a consesus policy porfolio can be followed. Untill then, every issue will be devisive, every debate will drive away some careerist hanger-on or closit Tory.

Nobody should expect this to be anything other than a barely concealed internal civil-war but there is no room in Corbyn's Labour for anybody who is not willing to dump the post-Thatcher emphasis on Corporate interest in favour of a re-statement of political purpose as champions of the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited in our society.

Make no mistake, the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited make up a very large segment of British society and one that is continually growing thanks to Osborne and chums.

The Tories are a grand recruiting sargeant for Labour.

What a lot of tosh.

Firstly, the Tory aim is to reduce the burden on the state from people working and still eligible for benefit of one sort or another. This situation only encourages employers to pay less at tax payers expense.
Secondly. The idea that you can keep increasing minimum wage and not cause unemployment is insane. Where is that money coming from ?

What is this social engineering of which you speak ?

There is no ground swell of discontent. This is just the usual tired old nonsense that you always hear when the Conservatives are in power. The tiny minority of hard line lefties get all upset and throw their dummy out of the pram. Probably paid for with benefits.

Where were you all at the election ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 13 Oct 15 12.46pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 11.50am

What's all the fuss about?

Firstly, the Conservative 'surplus' pledge is a nothing more than a legitimisation device to get yet more draconian pieces of 'social engineering' through Parliament. It is also a mean spirited target which enables the 'Out' camp to point at the money going to Europe as a cause rather than effect of our econmic impotence.

A couple of right-wingers in the party don't like it?
Didums has lost his dummy....
A purge of these faux-Tory careerist MP's is the best thing that could happen....toddle off to another party if socialism is that unpalatable.

Diane Abbott...Ha Ha....she's just a better camouflaged self-centered careerist who's really not as 'left' as sh'd like us to believe.

Obviously the re-birth of a proper Labour Party based on Socialist Values is going to be messy. Once they put the Blairites out of harms way - whether by de-selection or by imposing discipline - then a consesus policy porfolio can be followed. Untill then, every issue will be devisive, every debate will drive away some careerist hanger-on or closit Tory.

Nobody should expect this to be anything other than a barely concealed internal civil-war but there is no room in Corbyn's Labour for anybody who is not willing to dump the post-Thatcher emphasis on Corporate interest in favour of a re-statement of political purpose as champions of the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited in our society.

Make no mistake, the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited make up a very large segment of British society and one that is continually growing thanks to Osborne and chums.

The Tories are a grand recruiting sargeant for Labour.


You are Rick from the young ones, I claim my prize.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ghosteagle Flag 13 Oct 15 12.53pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Oct 2015 12.42pm

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 11.50am

What's all the fuss about?

Firstly, the Conservative 'surplus' pledge is a nothing more than a legitimisation device to get yet more draconian pieces of 'social engineering' through Parliament. It is also a mean spirited target which enables the 'Out' camp to point at the money going to Europe as a cause rather than effect of our econmic impotence.

A couple of right-wingers in the party don't like it?
Didums has lost his dummy....
A purge of these faux-Tory careerist MP's is the best thing that could happen....toddle off to another party if socialism is that unpalatable.

Diane Abbott...Ha Ha....she's just a better camouflaged self-centered careerist who's really not as 'left' as sh'd like us to believe.

Obviously the re-birth of a proper Labour Party based on Socialist Values is going to be messy. Once they put the Blairites out of harms way - whether by de-selection or by imposing discipline - then a consesus policy porfolio can be followed. Untill then, every issue will be devisive, every debate will drive away some careerist hanger-on or closit Tory.

Nobody should expect this to be anything other than a barely concealed internal civil-war but there is no room in Corbyn's Labour for anybody who is not willing to dump the post-Thatcher emphasis on Corporate interest in favour of a re-statement of political purpose as champions of the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited in our society.

Make no mistake, the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited make up a very large segment of British society and one that is continually growing thanks to Osborne and chums.

The Tories are a grand recruiting sargeant for Labour.

What a lot of tosh.

Firstly, the Tory aim is to reduce the burden on the state from people working and still eligible for benefit of one sort or another. This situation only encourages employers to pay less at tax payers expense.
Secondly. The idea that you can keep increasing minimum wage and not cause unemployment is insane. Where is that money coming from ?

What is this social engineering of which you speak ?

There is no ground swell of discontent. This is just the usual tired old nonsense that you always hear when the Conservatives are in power. The tiny minority of hard line lefties get all upset and throw their dummy out of the pram. Probably paid for with benefits.

Where were you all at the election ?


This is untrue, as there is by definition always a groundswell of discontent. The argument is whether it is of a signifigant size to have any political impact. Given that a third of the country did not vote during the GE it would appear that there is a sizable portion of the country that is disengaged from politics. If that discontent can be effectivley harnessed is the question.

I think the attempts by the tories to force poor people out of london qualifies as social engineering, and should be the focus of more discussion within the public domain.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 13 Oct 15 12.58pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Quote ghosteagle at 13 Oct 2015 12.53pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Oct 2015 12.42pm

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 11.50am

What's all the fuss about?

Firstly, the Conservative 'surplus' pledge is a nothing more than a legitimisation device to get yet more draconian pieces of 'social engineering' through Parliament. It is also a mean spirited target which enables the 'Out' camp to point at the money going to Europe as a cause rather than effect of our econmic impotence.

A couple of right-wingers in the party don't like it?
Didums has lost his dummy....
A purge of these faux-Tory careerist MP's is the best thing that could happen....toddle off to another party if socialism is that unpalatable.

Diane Abbott...Ha Ha....she's just a better camouflaged self-centered careerist who's really not as 'left' as sh'd like us to believe.

Obviously the re-birth of a proper Labour Party based on Socialist Values is going to be messy. Once they put the Blairites out of harms way - whether by de-selection or by imposing discipline - then a consesus policy porfolio can be followed. Untill then, every issue will be devisive, every debate will drive away some careerist hanger-on or closit Tory.

Nobody should expect this to be anything other than a barely concealed internal civil-war but there is no room in Corbyn's Labour for anybody who is not willing to dump the post-Thatcher emphasis on Corporate interest in favour of a re-statement of political purpose as champions of the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited in our society.

Make no mistake, the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited make up a very large segment of British society and one that is continually growing thanks to Osborne and chums.

The Tories are a grand recruiting sargeant for Labour.

What a lot of tosh.

Firstly, the Tory aim is to reduce the burden on the state from people working and still eligible for benefit of one sort or another. This situation only encourages employers to pay less at tax payers expense.
Secondly. The idea that you can keep increasing minimum wage and not cause unemployment is insane. Where is that money coming from ?

What is this social engineering of which you speak ?

There is no ground swell of discontent. This is just the usual tired old nonsense that you always hear when the Conservatives are in power. The tiny minority of hard line lefties get all upset and throw their dummy out of the pram. Probably paid for with benefits.

Where were you all at the election ?


This is untrue, as there is by definition always a groundswell of discontent. The argument is whether it is of a signifigant size to have any political impact. Given that a third of the country did not vote during the GE it would appear that there is a sizable portion of the country that is disengaged from politics. If that discontent can be effectivley harnessed is the question.

I think the attempts by the tories to force poor people out of london qualifies as social engineering, and should be the focus of more discussion within the public domain.

Poor people out of London ???!! are you having a tin bath mate. Have you been to Leyton, West Croydon, Addo, Fort neef etc etc etc. if they ARE trying to push poor people out of london they are doing a sh1t job.


Edited by dannyh (13 Oct 2015 1.00pm)

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Red-Blue-Yellow Flag Surrey 13 Oct 15 12.59pm Send a Private Message to Red-Blue-Yellow Add Red-Blue-Yellow as a friend

Quote We are goin up! at 13 Oct 2015 12.07pm

In your weird world the general election never happened, did it?

Pardon?
Of course it happened....we'd never have got here without it.
I'm relieved that the Labour of yesterday is not in power, it would have been just as bad as the Conservatives but in a different way.
Now Britain has some balance in it's politics. Or will have soon.
The Labour right is hopelessly compromised by it's track record and thouroughly distrusted by all except the Blairite MPs and local big-wigs themselves.
Times are changing, Labour is addressing an essentially new constituancy in a counntry that is socially and economically unrecogocnisable from the one that the party abandoned under Blair.
It's a trend with echoes across Europe too.

No, the Election happened, was fought by a out of date and out of touch leadership which, thankfully, was a casualty of the defeat.
Once the party can present a coherent raft of social and economic alternatives to the voters ( which demands consensus from the membership and MPs and therefore won't happen untill the purge is well under way), then we'll see the politicising of the majority of new voters and those untill now marginalised and disinterested.

 


I also enjoy posting on: Love Everton Forum, the Acceptable Face of Scouse Football.
[Link]
twitter.com/LuvEvertonForum
Come and give it a look, new members would be lovely.
Come and JOIN.
Or they'll nick your telly.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ghosteagle Flag 13 Oct 15 1.03pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote dannyh at 13 Oct 2015 12.58pm

Quote ghosteagle at 13 Oct 2015 12.53pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 13 Oct 2015 12.42pm

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 11.50am

What's all the fuss about?

Firstly, the Conservative 'surplus' pledge is a nothing more than a legitimisation device to get yet more draconian pieces of 'social engineering' through Parliament. It is also a mean spirited target which enables the 'Out' camp to point at the money going to Europe as a cause rather than effect of our econmic impotence.

A couple of right-wingers in the party don't like it?
Didums has lost his dummy....
A purge of these faux-Tory careerist MP's is the best thing that could happen....toddle off to another party if socialism is that unpalatable.

Diane Abbott...Ha Ha....she's just a better camouflaged self-centered careerist who's really not as 'left' as sh'd like us to believe.

Obviously the re-birth of a proper Labour Party based on Socialist Values is going to be messy. Once they put the Blairites out of harms way - whether by de-selection or by imposing discipline - then a consesus policy porfolio can be followed. Untill then, every issue will be devisive, every debate will drive away some careerist hanger-on or closit Tory.

Nobody should expect this to be anything other than a barely concealed internal civil-war but there is no room in Corbyn's Labour for anybody who is not willing to dump the post-Thatcher emphasis on Corporate interest in favour of a re-statement of political purpose as champions of the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited in our society.

Make no mistake, the oppressed, the dispossessed and the exploited make up a very large segment of British society and one that is continually growing thanks to Osborne and chums.

The Tories are a grand recruiting sargeant for Labour.

What a lot of tosh.

Firstly, the Tory aim is to reduce the burden on the state from people working and still eligible for benefit of one sort or another. This situation only encourages employers to pay less at tax payers expense.
Secondly. The idea that you can keep increasing minimum wage and not cause unemployment is insane. Where is that money coming from ?

What is this social engineering of which you speak ?

There is no ground swell of discontent. This is just the usual tired old nonsense that you always hear when the Conservatives are in power. The tiny minority of hard line lefties get all upset and throw their dummy out of the pram. Probably paid for with benefits.

Where were you all at the election ?


This is untrue, as there is by definition always a groundswell of discontent. The argument is whether it is of a signifigant size to have any political impact. Given that a third of the country did not vote during the GE it would appear that there is a sizable portion of the country that is disengaged from politics. If that discontent can be effectivley harnessed is the question.

I think the attempts by the tories to force poor people out of london qualifies as social engineering, and should be the focus of more discussion within the public domain.

Poor people out of London ???!! are you having a tin bath mate. Have you been to Leyton, West Croydon, Addo, Fort neef etc etc etc. if they ARE trying to push poor people out of london they are doing a sh1t job.


Edited by dannyh (13 Oct 2015 1.00pm)

I disagree, they are doing a fine job with the combination of rising rents and camerons proposal to remove the need for developers to build affordable housing which will push even more of the poorest out of the capital.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 13 Oct 15 1.03pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 12.59pm

Quote We are goin up! at 13 Oct 2015 12.07pm

In your weird world the general election never happened, did it?

Pardon?
Of course it happened....we'd never have got here without it.
I'm relieved that the Labour of yesterday is not in power, it would have been just as bad as the Conservatives but in a different way.
Now Britain has some balance in it's politics. Or will have soon.
The Labour right is hopelessly compromised by it's track record and thouroughly distrusted by all except the Blairite MPs and local big-wigs themselves.
Times are changing, Labour is addressing an essentially new constituancy in a counntry that is socially and economically unrecogocnisable from the one that the party abandoned under Blair.
It's a trend with echoes across Europe too.

No, the Election happened, was fought by a out of date and out of touch leadership which, thankfully, was a casualty of the defeat.
Once the party can present a coherent raft of social and economic alternatives to the voters ( which demands consensus from the membership and MPs and therefore won't happen untill the purge is well under way), then we'll see the politicising of the majority of new voters and those untill now marginalised and disinterested.

Wow just wow, that is the longest most bizzare answer to a question I've ever read. I take it back you not Rick from the young ones.

You are Chairman Mao.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 13 Oct 15 1.05pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 12.59pm

Quote We are goin up! at 13 Oct 2015 12.07pm

In your weird world the general election never happened, did it?

Pardon?
Of course it happened....we'd never have got here without it.
I'm relieved that the Labour of yesterday is not in power, it would have been just as bad as the Conservatives but in a different way.
Now Britain has some balance in it's politics. Or will have soon.
The Labour right is hopelessly compromised by it's track record and thouroughly distrusted by all except the Blairite MPs and local big-wigs themselves.
Times are changing, Labour is addressing an essentially new constituancy in a counntry that is socially and economically unrecogocnisable from the one that the party abandoned under Blair.
It's a trend with echoes across Europe too.

No, the Election happened, was fought by a out of date and out of touch leadership which, thankfully, was a casualty of the defeat.
Once the party can present a coherent raft of social and economic alternatives to the voters ( which demands consensus from the membership and MPs and therefore won't happen untill the purge is well under way), then we'll see the politicising of the majority of new voters and those untill now marginalised and disinterested.


The thing is, we won't know for a while yet how representative the new leadership are. They may well appeal to the harder left and younger voters, but they may lose support from more moderate Labour supporters.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ghosteagle Flag 13 Oct 15 1.06pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote dannyh at 13 Oct 2015 1.03pm

Quote Red-Blue-Yellow at 13 Oct 2015 12.59pm

Quote We are goin up! at 13 Oct 2015 12.07pm

In your weird world the general election never happened, did it?

Pardon?
Of course it happened....we'd never have got here without it.
I'm relieved that the Labour of yesterday is not in power, it would have been just as bad as the Conservatives but in a different way.
Now Britain has some balance in it's politics. Or will have soon.
The Labour right is hopelessly compromised by it's track record and thouroughly distrusted by all except the Blairite MPs and local big-wigs themselves.
Times are changing, Labour is addressing an essentially new constituancy in a counntry that is socially and economically unrecogocnisable from the one that the party abandoned under Blair.
It's a trend with echoes across Europe too.

No, the Election happened, was fought by a out of date and out of touch leadership which, thankfully, was a casualty of the defeat.
Once the party can present a coherent raft of social and economic alternatives to the voters ( which demands consensus from the membership and MPs and therefore won't happen untill the purge is well under way), then we'll see the politicising of the majority of new voters and those untill now marginalised and disinterested.

Wow just wow, that is the longest most bizzare answer to a question I've ever read. I take it back you not Rick from the young ones.

You are Chairman Mao.


Given the obvious differences between the two people in both physical and political terms it seems that you have not taken the proper time to really try and identify whom this poster is and may be seeking to deflect from the point with a joke.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Red-Blue-Yellow Flag Surrey 13 Oct 15 2.08pm Send a Private Message to Red-Blue-Yellow Add Red-Blue-Yellow as a friend

Quote dannyh at 13 Oct 2015 1.03pm


Wow just wow, that is the longest most bizzare answer to a question I've ever read. I take it back you not Rick from the young ones.

You are Chairman Mao.


Stop it with the compliments

Think of me as somebody with a Politics Degree, a jaundiced view of conservative and neo-liberal politics and politicians, a recogniser of crypto-fascist corporate influence masquerading as 'economic neccessity'....or for the hard of reading...A DIED IN THE WOOL SOCIALIST. Not a self-serving Union minion, not a looney left idealist, just someone who, after 60yrs on this Earth, sees the alternatives available to a properly enfranchised citizenry.

From Each According To Their Ability - To Each According To Their Need.

Simple....the Credo not achieving it. That's harder. That's what the whole purpose of the Labour Party is.
To fight for the Fairest Possible Society.

 


I also enjoy posting on: Love Everton Forum, the Acceptable Face of Scouse Football.
[Link]
twitter.com/LuvEvertonForum
Come and give it a look, new members would be lovely.
Come and JOIN.
Or they'll nick your telly.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Labours Economic Policy U Turn !