You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > witch hunts
November 23 2024 7.46pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

witch hunts

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 11 Sep 15 6.15pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 11 Sep 2015 5.19pm

Quote Ian J at 11 Sep 2015 10.40am

Quote Straightbackup at 11 Sep 2015 9.04am

It's always the Police that get blamed in these cases but they have a duty to investigate whether they believe the accuser or not.

They also have a duty to investigate domestic burglaries but have admitted that they often don't have time so don't bother



Evidently no shortage of resources to investigate 'crimes' like this, either.

[Link]

Do we know the 'heritage' of the three people in the costumes. If they have Caribbean or African antecedents, will Police Scotland continue to carry out its investigation?

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 11 Sep 15 6.49pm

Quote Kermit8 at 11 Sep 2015 10.27am

My guilt-o-meter says 'she is a very fortunate lady'

Your guilt-o-meter! Word of one person against another. On the one hand a teacher of many years with an unblemished record, on the other, a heroin addict who went off with 'travelers' when he was 15. You unerringly plump for the wrong'un - typical lefty.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 11 Sep 15 7.33pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote leggedstruggle at 11 Sep 2015 6.49pm

Quote Kermit8 at 11 Sep 2015 10.27am

My guilt-o-meter says 'she is a very fortunate lady'

Your guilt-o-meter! Word of one person against another. On the one hand a teacher of many years with an unblemished record, on the other, a heroin addict who went off with 'travelers' when he was 15. You unerringly plump for the wrong'un - typical lefty.


Do you think perhaps at 15 he may have been a bit screwed up for some reason and may have got involved in hard drugs around this time?

I wonder why? Its not normal behaviour for an emotionally stable 15 year old is it?

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 11 Sep 15 7.56pm

Quote Kermit8 at 11 Sep 2015 7.33pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 11 Sep 2015 6.49pm

Quote Kermit8 at 11 Sep 2015 10.27am

My guilt-o-meter says 'she is a very fortunate lady'

Your guilt-o-meter! Word of one person against another. On the one hand a teacher of many years with an unblemished record, on the other, a heroin addict who went off with 'travelers' when he was 15. You unerringly plump for the wrong'un - typical lefty.


Do you think perhaps at 15 he may have been a bit screwed up for some reason and may have got involved in hard drugs around this time?

I wonder why? Its not normal behaviour for an emotionally stable 15 year old is it?

Tenuous reasons relieving an individual of responsibility for making poor life decisions - typical lefty.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Straightbackup Flag Crystal Palace 11 Sep 15 10.03pm Send a Private Message to Straightbackup Add Straightbackup as a friend

Quote Cucking Funt at 11 Sep 2015 5.19pm

Quote Ian J at 11 Sep 2015 10.40am

Quote Straightbackup at 11 Sep 2015 9.04am

It's always the Police that get blamed in these cases but they have a duty to investigate whether they believe the accuser or not.

They also have a duty to investigate domestic burglaries but have admitted that they often don't have time so don't bother



Evidently no shortage of resources to investigate 'crimes' like this, either.

'Police Scotland has confirmed it is carrying out an investigation after complaints over the Wick Gala, in Caithness, Scotland'

If some moron decides they are offended by something like this 'crime' then yes, as I previously alluded to, they are duty bound to investigate it whether they think it's bollocks or not. Your point is?

 


'Impulse' advert- Advertising campaign whose slogan is expected to change in the light of Rajiv Gandhi's assassination: 'If someone you don't know suddenly offers you flowers- run like f***!'

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 11 Sep 15 10.27pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote leggedstruggle at 11 Sep 2015 7.56pm

Quote Kermit8 at 11 Sep 2015 7.33pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 11 Sep 2015 6.49pm

Quote Kermit8 at 11 Sep 2015 10.27am

My guilt-o-meter says 'she is a very fortunate lady'

Your guilt-o-meter! Word of one person against another. On the one hand a teacher of many years with an unblemished record, on the other, a heroin addict who went off with 'travelers' when he was 15. You unerringly plump for the wrong'un - typical lefty.


Do you think perhaps at 15 he may have been a bit screwed up for some reason and may have got involved in hard drugs around this time?

I wonder why? Its not normal behaviour for an emotionally stable 15 year old is it?

Tenuous reasons relieving an individual of responsibility for making poor life decisions - typical lefty.


There is a vacancy at The Samaritans with your name stamped on it.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Sep 15 3.28pm

To play devils advocate, just because she was found not guilty it doesn't mean that he necessarily lied, but that reasonable doubt existed in the jurors minds - proving 'beyond reasonable doubt' is different from establishing a concrete proof. That of course doesn't mean that the guy was lying, only that he may have made it all up. That has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt as well.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Sep 15 3.30pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 11 Sep 2015 6.49pm

Quote Kermit8 at 11 Sep 2015 10.27am

My guilt-o-meter says 'she is a very fortunate lady'

Your guilt-o-meter! Word of one person against another. On the one hand a teacher of many years with an unblemished record, on the other, a heroin addict who went off with 'travelers' when he was 15. You unerringly plump for the wrong'un - typical lefty.

Damn that statistical data that shows a positive correlation between abuse in childhood and addiction, as well as behaviours such as running away. I mean what's the world coming to when the facts support an scenario.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 13 Sep 15 3.33pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Sep 2015 3.28pm

To play devils advocate, just because she was found not guilty it doesn't mean that he necessarily lied, but that reasonable doubt existed in the jurors minds - proving 'beyond reasonable doubt' is different from establishing a concrete proof. That of course doesn't mean that the guy was lying, only that he may have made it all up. That has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt as well.

What is beyond reasonable doubt is that the prosecution should never have been brought forward in the first place. Asking a jury to convict someone on the mere word of one person concerning alleged events that happened 20 years before.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 13 Sep 15 3.35pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Sep 2015 3.30pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 11 Sep 2015 6.49pm

Quote Kermit8 at 11 Sep 2015 10.27am

My guilt-o-meter says 'she is a very fortunate lady'

Your guilt-o-meter! Word of one person against another. On the one hand a teacher of many years with an unblemished record, on the other, a heroin addict who went off with 'travelers' when he was 15. You unerringly plump for the wrong'un - typical lefty.

Damn that statistical data that shows a positive correlation between abuse in childhood and addiction, as well as behaviours such as running away. I mean what's the world coming to when the facts support an scenario.


So you convict someone of sexual abuse based on the 'victim' being a heroin addict - indeed, what's the world coming to.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Sep 15 3.40pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 13 Sep 2015 3.33pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Sep 2015 3.28pm

To play devils advocate, just because she was found not guilty it doesn't mean that he necessarily lied, but that reasonable doubt existed in the jurors minds - proving 'beyond reasonable doubt' is different from establishing a concrete proof. That of course doesn't mean that the guy was lying, only that he may have made it all up. That has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt as well.

What is beyond reasonable doubt is that the prosecution should never have been brought forward in the first place. Asking a jury to convict someone on the mere word of one person concerning alleged events that happened 20 years before.

Was that the only evidence offered, his word? The actual outcome seems to be that the jury could not reach a majority verdict. In reality she's been bailed for a week for the prosecution to decide whether it wishes to pursue a retrial.

So I'd say its not quite as clear cut as people seem to think.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 13 Sep 15 3.43pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Sep 2015 3.40pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 13 Sep 2015 3.33pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Sep 2015 3.28pm

To play devils advocate, just because she was found not guilty it doesn't mean that he necessarily lied, but that reasonable doubt existed in the jurors minds - proving 'beyond reasonable doubt' is different from establishing a concrete proof. That of course doesn't mean that the guy was lying, only that he may have made it all up. That has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt as well.

What is beyond reasonable doubt is that the prosecution should never have been brought forward in the first place. Asking a jury to convict someone on the mere word of one person concerning alleged events that happened 20 years before.

Was that the only evidence offered, his word? The actual outcome seems to be that the jury could not reach a majority verdict. In reality she's been bailed for a week for the prosecution to decide whether it wishes to pursue a retrial.

So I'd say its not quite as clear cut as people seem to think.


It doesn't surprise me at all that the prosecution will waste yet more time and money trying to conjure up a case out of nothing - it is the fashion.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > witch hunts