This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Mapletree Croydon 19 Jul 15 7.28pm | |
---|---|
Thanks to you all Surprised a 16 year old can be sued, just goes to show you can't trust Google. The woman decided there was a back problem after my daughter put her in touch with the chiropractor. As thoroughbreds do it had tweaked itself a couple of times but no sign of a long term problem. Just wishful thinking from the buyer now she finds she can't handle a horse as well as someone that was 15 when she bought it. So she is trying to say there was an underlying back problem to force my daughter to buy the horse back. Meanwhile it is out of work and appears to be suffering muscle wastage. What really was outrageous is that she made the threat to take my daughter to Court right in the middle of her GCSEs, the night before two of her most difficult ones.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
shaun57 chislehurst 19 Jul 15 7.35pm | |
---|---|
Hi, Anytime after that, you would be silly not to have them checked out.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Harry Beever Newbury 19 Jul 15 7.43pm | |
---|---|
Quote Mapletree at 19 Jul 2015 7.28pm
Thanks to you all Surprised a 16 year old can be sued, just goes to show you can't trust Google. The woman decided there was a back problem after my daughter put her in touch with the chiropractor. As thoroughbreds do it had tweaked itself a couple of times but no sign of a long term problem. Just wishful thinking from the buyer now she finds she can't handle a horse as well as someone that was 15 when she bought it. So she is trying to say there was an underlying back problem to force my daughter to buy the horse back.
What really was outrageous is that she made the threat to take my daughter to Court right in the middle of her GCSEs, the night before two of her most difficult ones.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 19 Jul 15 9.39pm | |
---|---|
Talk to a solicitor, chances are that the emphasis is 'buyer beware', but there may well be special legal grounds that cover live stock and especially horses.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EagleEyedAlbert ...too far north of the water. 19 Jul 15 10.30pm | |
---|---|
Quote wizlon at 19 Jul 2015 1.17pm
Did the buyer ask for and receive a recent veterinary medical report before purchase? If not then it's a case of caveat emptor. If so and the report was indicative of existing or potential problems, then again caveat emptor. 2 years after purchase is far too long for anyone to reasonably discover an issue that should have been reported/discovered at purchase. Personally I think that the buyer is attempting to bully your child into paying and wouldn't have a leg to stand on in any court.
Something tells me this horse isn't going to win the Grand National anytime soon.
-Can often be found on HOL Radio chatting Palace-related nonsense: Catch it here, Sunday Nights 8pm: [Link] HOL Radio Twitter: [Link] Me on the Twitter: [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Irisheagle87 Co.Derry 20 Jul 15 12.16am | |
---|---|
Quote Mapletree at 19 Jul 2015 7.28pm
Thanks to you all Surprised a 16 year old can be sued, just goes to show you can't trust Google. The woman decided there was a back problem after my daughter put her in touch with the chiropractor. As thoroughbreds do it had tweaked itself a couple of times but no sign of a long term problem. Just wishful thinking from the buyer now she finds she can't handle a horse as well as someone that was 15 when she bought it. So she is trying to say there was an underlying back problem to force my daughter to buy the horse back. Meanwhile it is out of work and appears to be suffering muscle wastage. What really was outrageous is that she made the threat to take my daughter to Court right in the middle of her GCSEs, the night before two of her most difficult ones. This is the modern world mapletree. Common sense used to be a good sense of knowledge. Now as the saying goes we're I'm from I reckon I'm smart because I know I'm stupid!
THE 17th OF MAY. MY 17th BIRTHDAY. MICHEAL HUGHES SCORES THE WINNING PENALTY, WHAT WAS HIS NUMBER? 17!!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Seth On a pale blue dot 20 Jul 15 2.53am | |
---|---|
I don't think a person of 16 could be sued. Legally they're a child and I'd be very surprised if you could take a child to court for something like that. But I'd get some proper legal advice if I was you Maple.
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 20 Jul 15 9.52am | |
---|---|
get proper legal advice. For what its worth, I'd tell her to crack on, as she won't be getting a penny. Further more I would also make it clear that if she harrases my daughter again over the matter (as a minor), you will class this as child bullying and inform the police, with a view to taking out an injunction against her contacting your "child". I imagine that will cool her jets.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 20 Jul 15 10.18am | |
---|---|
As is so often the case, we are fortunate to have something of a specialist on the HOL who has made contact. The new owner has focused her attention on me and my wife for the timebeing. The initial contact was made to my daughter via facebook at 8.30 pm in the middle of her GCSEs, she came downstairs looking quite ashen. Fortunately she is a tough cookie and up for the fight. I will let you know how this unfolds, albeit I don't think the woman has any case at all. I had assumed she would by now have taken advice that told her that. I can only guess she thinks if she keeps writing threatening letters we will cave in and take the horse back. We will probably get a Letter Before Action, I may be wrong but I think they are relatively cheap to have written and look scary. Poor horse is actually really good but it's not easy keeping a thoroughbred so I am told. I don't know one end from the other, so stay clear of both.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 20 Jul 15 10.44am | |
---|---|
Quote wizlon at 19 Jul 2015 1.17pm
Did the buyer ask for and receive a recent veterinary medical report before purchase? If not then it's a case of caveat emptor. 2 years after purchase is far too long for anyone to reasonably discover an issue that should have been reported/discovered at purchase. Personally I think that the buyer is attempting to bully your child into paying and wouldn't have a leg to stand on in any court.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Holmesdale Nick South Croydon 20 Jul 15 1.22pm | |
---|---|
If I was buying a used car I would get an AA inspection before paying any money to the seller. If I was buying a horse I would get a medical from the vet before paying any money to the seller.
Fitter Fans Group 2. No. 17 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 20 Jul 15 1.37pm | |
---|---|
I once went out with a female solicitor who also owned a horse. I know she would insist on a vetinary inspection before purchasing a horse. She didn't like 'doggy', but loved me 'feeding the horse'. Hope some of the above is useful
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.