This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
johnno42000 14 May 15 6.46pm | |
---|---|
Could this be one of the first promises broken? Which would be surprising as the Tories did better, than I think even they believed they would do, in Wales.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
derben 14 May 15 7.07pm | |
---|---|
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 6.39pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 6.35pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 6.29pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 6.18pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 5.57pm
These "New counter-terrorism measures" will inevitably devolve into something that's applied to anything and anyone the government doesn't like. That's what has happened each and every time with this kind of legislation. “For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone',” Cameron said “This government will conclusively turn the page on this failed approach".
You must be really worried that they will be knocking on your door - a fearless critic of the government like you. Under these plans some people will have to get permission from the police before making Facebook posts. It's absurd. Either arrest people for breaking the law or let them be. It's already stupid enough that mildly offensive drunken tweets end up becoming criminal matters on account that someone is mildy 'offended'. Apparently you're all for that though. I thought you were for small government. I am for less government. I just think it funny that you make out we are becoming some sort of Stalinist police state when they are just trying to stop people blowing us up. Edited by derben (14 May 2015 6.35pm) As stated, whether under Labour or Conservatives all of these expansive new laws end up getting widened and used for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime. You know this. Whether you care about that is you for. It's really about having more control over the population in general, Mr small government. Edited by imbored (14 May 2015 6.45pm) Well of course I don't accept that "all of these expansive new laws end up getting widened and used for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime." It is simply nonsense to say it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TUX redhill 14 May 15 7.17pm | |
---|---|
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 7.07pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 6.39pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 6.35pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 6.29pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 6.18pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 5.57pm
These "New counter-terrorism measures" will inevitably devolve into something that's applied to anything and anyone the government doesn't like. That's what has happened each and every time with this kind of legislation. “For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone',” Cameron said “This government will conclusively turn the page on this failed approach".
You must be really worried that they will be knocking on your door - a fearless critic of the government like you. Under these plans some people will have to get permission from the police before making Facebook posts. It's absurd. Either arrest people for breaking the law or let them be. It's already stupid enough that mildly offensive drunken tweets end up becoming criminal matters on account that someone is mildy 'offended'. Apparently you're all for that though. I thought you were for small government. I am for less government. I just think it funny that you make out we are becoming some sort of Stalinist police state when they are just trying to stop people blowing us up. Edited by derben (14 May 2015 6.35pm) As stated, whether under Labour or Conservatives all of these expansive new laws end up getting widened and used for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime. You know this. Whether you care about that is you for. It's really about having more control over the population in general, Mr small government. Edited by imbored (14 May 2015 6.45pm) Well of course I don't accept that "all of these expansive new laws end up getting widened and used for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime." It is simply nonsense to say it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
imbored UK 14 May 15 7.21pm | |
---|---|
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 7.07pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 6.39pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 6.35pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 6.29pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 6.18pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 5.57pm
These "New counter-terrorism measures" will inevitably devolve into something that's applied to anything and anyone the government doesn't like. That's what has happened each and every time with this kind of legislation. “For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone',” Cameron said “This government will conclusively turn the page on this failed approach".
You must be really worried that they will be knocking on your door - a fearless critic of the government like you. Under these plans some people will have to get permission from the police before making Facebook posts. It's absurd. Either arrest people for breaking the law or let them be. It's already stupid enough that mildly offensive drunken tweets end up becoming criminal matters on account that someone is mildy 'offended'. Apparently you're all for that though. I thought you were for small government. I am for less government. I just think it funny that you make out we are becoming some sort of Stalinist police state when they are just trying to stop people blowing us up. Edited by derben (14 May 2015 6.35pm) As stated, whether under Labour or Conservatives all of these expansive new laws end up getting widened and used for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime. You know this. Whether you care about that is you for. It's really about having more control over the population in general, Mr small government. Edited by imbored (14 May 2015 6.45pm) Well of course I don't accept that "all of these expansive new laws end up getting widened and used for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime." It is simply nonsense to say it. It's a statement of fact, not a suggestion. It was happened multiple times previously. As for the EU, I'm not fussed either way. In fact I posted about an hour ago, of how warped and biased I imagined the campaign to force us to stay will be. It should be for the people to decide it won't be, just as it won't be with these looming 'corporate coup' type trade agreements, but you're happy in your bubble so what does it matter to you. Edited by imbored (14 May 2015 7.23pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 14 May 15 7.24pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 6.46pm
Could this be one of the first promises broken? Which would be surprising as the Tories did better, than I think even they believed they would do, in Wales.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
susmik PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 14 May 15 7.35pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 6.25pm
Just look what you've done.
"Police walk past as activists from Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth resist a family’s eviction from a flat in an estate in south London that had been marked for demolition"...............
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnno42000 14 May 15 7.42pm | |
---|---|
Quote susmik at 14 May 2015 7.35pm
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 6.25pm
Just look what you've done.
"Police walk past as activists from Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth resist a family’s eviction from a flat in an estate in south London that had been marked for demolition"............... 'Most probably' and where is the proof for that?
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rubin 14 May 15 8.36pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 7.42pm
Quote susmik at 14 May 2015 7.35pm
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 6.25pm
Just look what you've done.
"Police walk past as activists from Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth resist a family’s eviction from a flat in an estate in south London that had been marked for demolition"............... 'Most probably' and where is the proof for that?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
susmik PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 14 May 15 8.38pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 7.42pm
Quote susmik at 14 May 2015 7.35pm
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 6.25pm
Just look what you've done.
"Police walk past as activists from Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth resist a family’s eviction from a flat in an estate in south London that had been marked for demolition"............... 'Most probably' and where is the proof for that? on YOUR link under the picture.....Not from me sunshine!
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 May 15 8.45pm | |
---|---|
Quote susmik at 14 May 2015 8.38pm
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 7.42pm
Quote susmik at 14 May 2015 7.35pm
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 6.25pm
Just look what you've done. I notice the caption underneath the picture on your link: "Police walk past as activists from Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth resist a family’s eviction from a flat in an estate in south London that had been marked for demolition"............... 'Most probably' and where is the proof for that? on YOUR link under the picture.....Not from me sunshine! Sorry, but 'The family most probably have been offered elsewhere to live but cannot be arsed to move and has nothing to do with cannot afford their rent ?????' isn't in the caption. Attachment: guardian rent pic.jpg (364.62Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnno42000 14 May 15 8.46pm | |
---|---|
Quote susmik at 14 May 2015 8.38pm
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 7.42pm
Quote susmik at 14 May 2015 7.35pm
Quote johnno42000 at 14 May 2015 6.25pm
Just look what you've done.
"Police walk past as activists from Housing Action Southwark and Lambeth resist a family’s eviction from a flat in an estate in south London that had been marked for demolition"............... 'Most probably' and where is the proof for that? on YOUR link under the picture.....Not from me sunshine! I can't see anywhere that says they have been offered elsewhere to live?
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 May 15 10.16pm | |
---|---|
Quote TUX at 14 May 2015 7.17pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 7.07pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 6.39pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 6.35pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 6.29pm
Quote derben at 14 May 2015 6.18pm
Quote imbored at 14 May 2015 5.57pm
These "New counter-terrorism measures" will inevitably devolve into something that's applied to anything and anyone the government doesn't like. That's what has happened each and every time with this kind of legislation. “For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone',” Cameron said “This government will conclusively turn the page on this failed approach".
You must be really worried that they will be knocking on your door - a fearless critic of the government like you. Under these plans some people will have to get permission from the police before making Facebook posts. It's absurd. Either arrest people for breaking the law or let them be. It's already stupid enough that mildly offensive drunken tweets end up becoming criminal matters on account that someone is mildy 'offended'. Apparently you're all for that though. I thought you were for small government. I am for less government. I just think it funny that you make out we are becoming some sort of Stalinist police state when they are just trying to stop people blowing us up. Edited by derben (14 May 2015 6.35pm) As stated, whether under Labour or Conservatives all of these expansive new laws end up getting widened and used for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime. You know this. Whether you care about that is you for. It's really about having more control over the population in general, Mr small government. Edited by imbored (14 May 2015 6.45pm) Well of course I don't accept that "all of these expansive new laws end up getting widened and used for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime." It is simply nonsense to say it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.