This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 13 Dec 19 11.47am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Plenty of low earners hold the belief that higher earners shouldn’t just be taxed more and more and more (maybe adding if it’s the fast and easy option). That kind of opinion starts before adulthood and continues. It could be changing with the changing demographic, momentum, social(ist) media etc but many people more than the left wing think feel this way. You might think they’re naive or stupid when they’ll never ever earn more than the average wage, but they do, and that’s English conservatism. That and Labour always overspending. I think that’ll all change but there’s loads of unskilled or low skilled people who’ll think some people ‘have done well for themselves’ (and I dislike that phrase personally), ‘why should they just have more and more taken in tax.’ I don't think they're naive and stupid, they are naive and stupid (if they think this). There's doing well for yourself and being comfortable, and then there's taking the piss, with no regard for anyone else other than yourself. Community and society works on cohesion, not division. I also don't agree with more and more and more. I agree with balanced, reasoned rises for those that simply do not need vast amounts of wealth. Even an idiot could agree that there comes a point where you simply do not actually need more and more money – when purchases become ostentatious and egotistical – it's at that stage especially where I feel things could and should be more balanced. Modest tax increases for people way and above 'comfortable' is hardly a revolutionary, or even damaging concept. Anyone with any sense of community or human understanding should be able to grasp that, rather than simply always aiming for more because they can. Once again, I say this as a 'comfortably' high earner. Edited by SW19 CPFC (13 Dec 2019 11.51am)
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Dec 19 11.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Have you ever seen Osborne and Mr Bean in the same room together? Another job....It wouldn't surprise me.....the number of concurrent jobs he has affects the employment figures.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 13 Dec 19 11.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
A question worthy of an answer. To be honest, at this precise moment all I want is one less star on that s***ty flag. It is a start. And whilst not the biggest fan of the Johnson WA, it at least moves it forward. I am actually not that happy with the size of the win last night. Would have happily settled for a much small majority because it might have reined Johnson in and allowed the ERG to hold him to account more. My ideal outcome would have been a hung Parliament with the Brexit Party holding the keys to a majority so we all have our disapointments. Ideally I want a Canada style free trade agreement. Not overly bothered about freedom of movement for reasons I have already expounded on before but I want us free of any legislative powers held outside of the Uk. Happy for the EU to sell us what they want, as long as it is reciprocated and even willing to see certain products given favourable status, ideally for Ireland, but ultimately ALL power back in Westminster. But we will see. Today I am chuffed. Tomorrow....lets see.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 13 Dec 19 11.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
BREAKING: Its all kicking off on GMTV. Its everyone against a Labour loon who still states 'Labour's policies are incredibly popular.' 👉Even after Labour just got the biggest beating of their life 🤣🤣🤣 [Link] Lol. Susannah Reid is like the in-law of her husband’s family kicking off at the dinner party, half expecting her to stand up and throw the turkey at the wall after she’s gone through all the hard work.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 13 Dec 19 12.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
A question worthy of an answer. To be honest, at this precise moment all I want is one less star on that s***ty flag. It is a start. And whilst not the biggest fan of the Johnson WA, it at least moves it forward. I am actually not that happy with the size of the win last night. Would have happily settled for a much small majority because it might have reined Johnson in and allowed the ERG to hold him to account more. My ideal outcome would have been a hung Parliament with the Brexit Party holding the keys to a majority so we all have our disapointments. Ideally I want a Canada style free trade agreement. Not overly bothered about freedom of movement for reasons I have already expounded on before but I want us free of any legislative powers held outside of the Uk. Happy for the EU to sell us what they want, as long as it is reciprocated and even willing to see certain products given favourable status, ideally for Ireland, but ultimately ALL power back in Westminster. But we will see. Today I am chuffed. Tomorrow....lets see. You have avoided the main points, but a fair answer to the last paragraph. I'm not sure how anyone, even as a leaver, can be 'chuffed' at the state of this. 'Clearer of mind' might be more appropriate, with the sauron issue now sort of out of the way. Maybe now partisans on both sides can actually start looking at the bigger picture as well.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Dec 19 12.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Nope As Blair said at the time, there was no requirement to agree. There was a reason the law was changed so that there had to be a majority in favour of snap elections. It was absolutely clear at the time that the best thing to do for the Labour Party was to sit on their hands Yep, but it would be completely immoral and just continue a zombie government at odds with most of the voters. Would you not criticise the Tories for carrying out policies that only favoured their party rather than what the country wanted? The election showed that the state of affairs in parliament was a disfigurement. Like I said a while back the best option for remainers was to back May's deal....but they wanted to bet it all on black. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Dec 2019 12.06pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Dec 19 12.04pm | |
---|---|
The north remembers.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 13 Dec 19 12.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
BREAKING: Its all kicking off on GMTV. Its everyone against a Labour loon who still states 'Labour's policies are incredibly popular.' 👉Even after Labour just got the biggest beating of their life 🤣🤣🤣 [Link] This was going on last night on TV by what appeared to be momentum supporters. Essentially they are throwing Corbyn under the bus and blaming Brexit (up to this point I agree)then they spoil it by saying their policies are popular. Well yeah with some people I have no doubt they are wildly popular of course if you look through the correct end of the telescope ...
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 13 Dec 19 12.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Yep, but it would be completely immoral and just continue a zombie government at odds with most of the voters. Would you not criticise the Tories for carrying out policies that only favoured their party rather than what the country wanted? The election showed that the state of affairs in parliament was a disfigurement. Like I said a while back the best option for remainers was to back May's deal....but they wanted to bet it all on black. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Dec 2019 12.06pm) But what happened was there was a one issue election. I don't ever remember such a thing before. Better for them to have forced a referendum instead.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Dec 19 12.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Let's not pretend that there are no morons on the leave side. Fairly equal I'd say there. The fact that people put Brexit above real issues simply to make a point is no cause for celebration. While one democratic decision has/will begin to be upheld (in what manner, who knows) and rightly so, actual issues have been forgotten about and sidelined at the expense of many. The next five years will play out very badly for a lot of people, and certainly not just those on the side of 'remain'. Have your cake while you can. You might not be around it eat it all. Being within the EU also went 'very badly' for many people as well. The political direction the EU has taken for the last forty years had no mandate and centralised power always suffers the further away the affected are. Not everything is financial. You have already said on here that you are prepared to lose money (in taxes) for what you believe in....For many people, this is the same. Democracy won here. Voters can kick Boris out in five years if they want.....this was their only opportunity with the EU....and it's a salient point. They saw how the establishment had treated the 2016 vote. This was the only opportunity they were going to get. They knew that the establishment would never give them that opportunity again. No one is in any doubt that this fight continues.....but one thing is sure, Brexit is happening. 'Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.' (Churchill)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 13 Dec 19 12.51pm | |
---|---|
Remainers put it down to Corbyn. Corbyn supporters put it down to Brexit. Everyone else puts it down to both, even candidates and campaigners in labour heartland that fell to the conservatives. They want brexit AND don’t like Corbyn. Edited by Rudi Hedman (13 Dec 2019 12.55pm)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 13 Dec 19 12.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
But what happened was there was a one issue election. I don't ever remember such a thing before. Better for them to have forced a referendum instead. Heath 1974 "who runs the country me or the trade union" . Actually Ted it's the union barons.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.