Unless you are a Millwall fan then its nearer 62%

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Give me the BBC over any other broadcaster every day, especially those controlled by the media barons with their specific agendas, like Murdoch. Having been to many parts of the world I don't think we realise just how lucky we are. I always search for the BBC when travelling as the source of informed, balanced, information and you might be surprised just how many others, in their home countries, also do so.

That the BBC is criticised by both the right, and the left, for being "biased" against them tells you that they get things right.

They are not tax funded at all. They are funded via the licence fee and are independent of government. For me they the BBC is a national treasure, who rank alongside the NHS as a great British achievement of the 20th century. That some seem not to value what they do is really very strange indeed. We would be much poorer without them.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The only person on the left that have criticised the BBC for bias has been Jeremy Corbyn which is rubbish because every outlet outside of the Morning Star has done and all justified. How else has the BBC been seen bias against the left?

'trump couldn't be more pro war, even nuclear'.

And your evidence for this is?

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I'm sorry, there's evidence for all the points in my post, most of it in the emails, as well as other sources. Why be in denial?

You should also look in to Haiti, and how aid money has disappeared and land rights have been given away to people close to the Clinton's, and watch the video 'Clinton Cash' on YouTube to see their links with African dictators and warlords amongst other things.

It's really not progressive to support Hillary, regardless of one's view of Trump.

Greater potential as their craniums were larger on the far end of the scale. I think they're the only known species of Hominid that overlapped with Homo Sapians (although there was another subset of homo sapian which could just as easily have been absorbed).

Most of the other homo genus, seem to have been to diversely located or ancient to have crossed paths with our particular genus, of course they are to related sharing a likely common ancestor - so you would expect to find a relationship genetically between them.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]