This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 27 Sep 15 1.02am | |
---|---|
Quote oldcodger at 27 Sep 2015 12.58am
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Sep 2015 12.54am
Quote oldcodger at 27 Sep 2015 12.50am
You inhibit place where any questioning of your sweeping statements is 'personal'. From what others have said we've been here before. You know how to walk the line. I won't start with the name calling like others, I'll just allow you to continue with the generalised attacks on 'the left', 'muslims', 'retards' and whoever else. It's no less slimey though. I don't blame others for calling a spade a spade. What attack on 'retards'? Again.....more misrepresentation. People have lied about my views before. When things have come to a head in the past and have been reviewed I wasn't the one found to be at fault. Who on earth behaves in such a way that their behaviour needs to be routinely 'reviewed'? I'll leave you be. It's clear that you both get a thrill out of your own swaggering and are oblivious to how you behave. No more comments from me. Enjoy spreading your anger around. I'm sure those around you really appreciate it. I'm too long in the tooth for toy soldiers, you're welcome to yours.
Misrepresent and you don't answer when called out. I say again, what attack on 'retards'? Then more personal stuff.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
oldcodger 27 Sep 15 1.07am | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 27 Sep 2015 12.15am
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Sep 2015 12.07am
Quote Kermit8 at 26 Sep 2015 11.56pm
Agreed. Your thoughts are not clouded but they are mystifyingly black and white for someone with a brain. With respect, in this instance, may i suggest your ........phobia has ridden roughshod over your intelligence.
But we aren't writing books here. I think by 'phobia' you are perhaps suggesting something darker....If so Kermy I can assure you I don't see it that way. It's true that I'm culturally a mild ethnocentric.....But I don't see how that has to be a negative.....I believe everyone should be.
As in demeanour overrides background.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 27 Sep 15 7.54am | |
---|---|
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.31am
Quote Kermit8 at 27 Sep 2015 12.03am
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
I live in a part of The Bronx where there is a Huge influx of people from the Yemen be they refugees or legal immigrants and I would say 99.9% of them make NO attempt to integrate into any part of American society. The majority of women wear burqa's and you never see the men talk to any of the other huge swathe of ethnicities here in my neighbourhood, be they Puerto Rican, Dominican, British Guyana, Burkina Fason's, Ecuadorian, Mexican etc. They are so culturally removed from western culture that the vast majority of them will never integrate fully. Now there are neighbourhoods dotted all over NYC which are Dominant in certain races. Woodlawn in the Bronx is Irish, Washington Heights is Dominican, Flushing in Queens is Chinese, Pelham Bay is very Philippine, Richmond Hill in Queens is very Punjabi, but one thing all these people bring to the table is although proud of their cultural roots they all regard themselves citizens of The USA. As it happens the more 'Secular' a muslim is the more they seem to find it easier to 'Fit in' I have a business partner Sylla who's from the Guinea & although Muslim culturally does not let it rule his life to the point of being excluded from he mainstream. Its the same as all my guys at the wholesalers all Muslim (and celebrated eid adha) yesterday but seemed to have some how spanned that divide between two cultures..........
Syrians can almost see Europe from their coastline - Cyprus - and are mostly cultured and educated and have been brought up with - albeit corrupt and murderous - a secular government not a religious one. They really wouldn't fit in to the more extreme and conservative regimes you mentioned anymore than you or I if they weren't that pious.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 27 Sep 15 10.03am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Sep 2015 1.02am
Quote oldcodger at 27 Sep 2015 12.58am
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Sep 2015 12.54am
Quote oldcodger at 27 Sep 2015 12.50am
You inhibit place where any questioning of your sweeping statements is 'personal'. From what others have said we've been here before. You know how to walk the line. I won't start with the name calling like others, I'll just allow you to continue with the generalised attacks on 'the left', 'muslims', 'retards' and whoever else. It's no less slimey though. I don't blame others for calling a spade a spade. What attack on 'retards'? Again.....more misrepresentation. People have lied about my views before. When things have come to a head in the past and have been reviewed I wasn't the one found to be at fault. Who on earth behaves in such a way that their behaviour needs to be routinely 'reviewed'? I'll leave you be. It's clear that you both get a thrill out of your own swaggering and are oblivious to how you behave. No more comments from me. Enjoy spreading your anger around. I'm sure those around you really appreciate it. I'm too long in the tooth for toy soldiers, you're welcome to yours.
Misrepresent and you don't answer when called out. I say again, what attack on 'retards'? Then more personal stuff.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 27 Sep 15 3.48pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 27 Sep 2015 10.03am
Whoever he/she is, I bet they don't get accused of being accurate or honest much.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Superfly The sun always shines in Catford 28 Sep 15 10.42am | |
---|---|
I saw a peanut stand, heard a rubber band
Lend me a Tenor 31 May to 3 June 2017 John McIntosh Arts Centre with Superfly in the chorus |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 28 Sep 15 5.25pm | |
---|---|
Quote Superfly at 28 Sep 2015 10.42am
I saw a peanut stand, heard a rubber band
Wow......Just wow.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 29 Sep 15 12.04pm | |
---|---|
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea. Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 29 Sep 15 12.15pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea. Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 29 Sep 15 12.23pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea. Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). Saudia Arabia - as big a human rights violator as any tinpot African dictatorship, as big a rogue state as pakistan or North Korea. Good job they have pots of oil money and spend billions to buy our death sh*t, our multi million pound Mayfair flats and also spend lavishly on our hugely expensive prossies or the US and us would have levelled the place years ago....
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 29 Sep 15 12.31pm | |
---|---|
Quote The Sash at 29 Sep 2015 12.23pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea. Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). Saudia Arabia - as big a human rights violator as any tinpot African dictatorship, as big a rogue state as pakistan or North Korea. Good job they have pots of oil money and spend billions to buy our death sh*t, our multi million pound Mayfair flats and also spend lavishly on our hugely expensive prossies or the US and us would have levelled the place years ago....
I've just been reading 'Inside the Kingdom' by Robert Lacey and, while it doesn't exactly contain too many surprises, it certainly confirms that the Saudis are c*nts of the highest order.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 29 Sep 15 12.55pm | |
---|---|
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea. Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.