You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > EU forces compulsory quotas on opposed countries
November 23 2024 8.04pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

EU forces compulsory quotas on opposed countries

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 16 of 17 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 >

  

Stirlingsays Flag 27 Sep 15 1.02am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote oldcodger at 27 Sep 2015 12.58am

Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Sep 2015 12.54am

Quote oldcodger at 27 Sep 2015 12.50am

You inhibit place where any questioning of your sweeping statements is 'personal'. From what others have said we've been here before. You know how to walk the line. I won't start with the name calling like others, I'll just allow you to continue with the generalised attacks on 'the left', 'muslims', 'retards' and whoever else. It's no less slimey though. I don't blame others for calling a spade a spade.

What attack on 'retards'?

Again.....more misrepresentation.

People have lied about my views before. When things have come to a head in the past and have been reviewed I wasn't the one found to be at fault.

Who on earth behaves in such a way that their behaviour needs to be routinely 'reviewed'? I'll leave you be. It's clear that you both get a thrill out of your own swaggering and are oblivious to how you behave. No more comments from me. Enjoy spreading your anger around. I'm sure those around you really appreciate it. I'm too long in the tooth for toy soldiers, you're welcome to yours.


Edited by oldcodger (27 Sep 2015 12.59am)


Yeah, 'routinely reviewed'......once.

Misrepresent and you don't answer when called out.

I say again, what attack on 'retards'?

Then more personal stuff.


Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Sep 2015 1.05am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
oldcodger Flag 27 Sep 15 1.07am Send a Private Message to oldcodger Add oldcodger as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 27 Sep 2015 12.15am

Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Sep 2015 12.07am

Quote Kermit8 at 26 Sep 2015 11.56pm

Agreed. Your thoughts are not clouded but they are mystifyingly black and white for someone with a brain.

With respect, in this instance, may i suggest your ........phobia has ridden roughshod over your intelligence.


I present a narrative, but I recognise it doesn't fit all instances.

But we aren't writing books here.

I think by 'phobia' you are perhaps suggesting something darker....If so Kermy I can assure you I don't see it that way.

It's true that I'm culturally a mild ethnocentric.....But I don't see how that has to be a negative.....I believe everyone should be.


I'll leave it here because sleep calls.....but I truly believe with regard to yout ethocentricity...,that you would rather live next door to a nice Syrian refugee family than a British Chav loud one.

As in demeanour overrides background.


Tell me I'm wrong.


Tell me about it. I lived next door to a maniac who both set our shared garden on fire - how?? why?? - and had three yappy dogs that would get started at about midnight. He was always gearing up for a confrontation and was about as welcoming to 'foreigners' or anyone really as some around here. If I could've exchanged him believe me I'd have done it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 27 Sep 15 7.54am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.31am

Quote Kermit8 at 27 Sep 2015 12.03am

Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm

Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings.

Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?

Meaning refugees.

But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?


Because they would fit in better there say, than in Basingstoke!!


No, they wouldn't. That's like saying your black mate from Thornton Heath back in the 70's would fit in better in the Congo than in Edinburgh. Wrong.

I live in a part of The Bronx where there is a Huge influx of people from the Yemen be they refugees or legal immigrants and I would say 99.9% of them make NO attempt to integrate into any part of American society. The majority of women wear burqa's and you never see the men talk to any of the other huge swathe of ethnicities here in my neighbourhood, be they Puerto Rican, Dominican, British Guyana, Burkina Fason's, Ecuadorian, Mexican etc. They are so culturally removed from western culture that the vast majority of them will never integrate fully. Now there are neighbourhoods dotted all over NYC which are Dominant in certain races. Woodlawn in the Bronx is Irish, Washington Heights is Dominican, Flushing in Queens is Chinese, Pelham Bay is very Philippine, Richmond Hill in Queens is very Punjabi, but one thing all these people bring to the table is although proud of their cultural roots they all regard themselves citizens of The USA. As it happens the more 'Secular' a muslim is the more they seem to find it easier to 'Fit in' I have a business partner Sylla who's from the Guinea & although Muslim culturally does not let it rule his life to the point of being excluded from he mainstream. Its the same as all my guys at the wholesalers all Muslim (and celebrated eid adha) yesterday but seemed to have some how spanned that divide between two cultures..........


I get it but we are talking mostly about Syrians here not the Yemenis. Two vey different peoples with differing outlooks and approaches and with the former being much more 21st century than the latter.

Syrians can almost see Europe from their coastline - Cyprus - and are mostly cultured and educated and have been brought up with - albeit corrupt and murderous - a secular government not a religious one.

They really wouldn't fit in to the more extreme and conservative regimes you mentioned anymore than you or I if they weren't that pious.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 27 Sep 15 10.03am

Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Sep 2015 1.02am

Quote oldcodger at 27 Sep 2015 12.58am

Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Sep 2015 12.54am

Quote oldcodger at 27 Sep 2015 12.50am

You inhibit place where any questioning of your sweeping statements is 'personal'. From what others have said we've been here before. You know how to walk the line. I won't start with the name calling like others, I'll just allow you to continue with the generalised attacks on 'the left', 'muslims', 'retards' and whoever else. It's no less slimey though. I don't blame others for calling a spade a spade.

What attack on 'retards'?

Again.....more misrepresentation.

People have lied about my views before. When things have come to a head in the past and have been reviewed I wasn't the one found to be at fault.

Who on earth behaves in such a way that their behaviour needs to be routinely 'reviewed'? I'll leave you be. It's clear that you both get a thrill out of your own swaggering and are oblivious to how you behave. No more comments from me. Enjoy spreading your anger around. I'm sure those around you really appreciate it. I'm too long in the tooth for toy soldiers, you're welcome to yours.


Edited by oldcodger (27 Sep 2015 12.59am)


Yeah, 'routinely reviewed'......once.

Misrepresent and you don't answer when called out.

I say again, what attack on 'retards'?

Then more personal stuff.


Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Sep 2015 1.05am)


This fella's posting style smacks of a former Hol poster reinvented .... far too confident for a "newbie" with all this personal attack stuff interspersing his left wing bleating.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 27 Sep 15 3.48pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote Hoof Hearted at 27 Sep 2015 10.03am


This fella's posting style smacks of a former Hol poster reinvented .... far too confident for a "newbie" with all this personal attack stuff interspersing his left wing bleating.


It wouldn't surprise me at all.

Whoever he/she is, I bet they don't get accused of being accurate or honest much.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Superfly Flag The sun always shines in Catford 28 Sep 15 10.42am Send a Private Message to Superfly Add Superfly as a friend

I saw a peanut stand, heard a rubber band
And seen a needle wink its eye
But I been done seen about everything
When I see Stirlingsays call somebody else condescending

 


Lend me a Tenor

31 May to 3 June 2017

John McIntosh Arts Centre
London Oratory School
SW6 1RX

with Superfly in the chorus
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 28 Sep 15 5.25pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote Superfly at 28 Sep 2015 10.42am

I saw a peanut stand, heard a rubber band
And seen a needle wink its eye
But I been done seen about everything
When I see Stirlingsays call somebody else condescending


You read all that and you have a pop at me?????

Wow......Just wow.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 29 Sep 15 12.04pm

Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm

Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings.

Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?

Meaning refugees.

But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?


Because they would fit in better there say, than in Basingstoke!!

Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea.

Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating.

Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term.

Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq).


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 29 Sep 15 12.15pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm

Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm

Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings.

Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?

Meaning refugees.

But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?


Because they would fit in better there say, than in Basingstoke!!

Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea.

Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating.

Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term.

Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq).


The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 29 Sep 15 12.23pm Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm

Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm

Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings.

Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?

Meaning refugees.

But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?


Because they would fit in better there say, than in Basingstoke!!

Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea.

Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating.

Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term.

Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq).


Saudia Arabia - as big a human rights violator as any tinpot African dictatorship, as big a rogue state as pakistan or North Korea.

Good job they have pots of oil money and spend billions to buy our death sh*t, our multi million pound Mayfair flats and also spend lavishly on our hugely expensive prossies or the US and us would have levelled the place years ago....


Edited by The Sash (29 Sep 2015 12.25pm)

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 29 Sep 15 12.31pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Quote The Sash at 29 Sep 2015 12.23pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm

Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm

Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings.

Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?

Meaning refugees.

But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?


Because they would fit in better there say, than in Basingstoke!!

Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea.

Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating.

Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term.

Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq).


Saudia Arabia - as big a human rights violator as any tinpot African dictatorship, as big a rogue state as pakistan or North Korea.

Good job they have pots of oil money and spend billions to buy our death sh*t, our multi million pound Mayfair flats and also spend lavishly on our hugely expensive prossies or the US and us would have levelled the place years ago....


Edited by The Sash (29 Sep 2015 12.25pm)

I've just been reading 'Inside the Kingdom' by Robert Lacey and, while it doesn't exactly contain too many surprises, it certainly confirms that the Saudis are c*nts of the highest order.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 29 Sep 15 12.55pm

Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm

Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm

Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm

Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm

Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings.

Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?

Meaning refugees.

But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?


Because they would fit in better there say, than in Basingstoke!!

Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea.

Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating.

Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term.

Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq).


The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues.

I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so.

Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars?


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 16 of 17 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > EU forces compulsory quotas on opposed countries