Can you support this claim? No one else in his community reported him to the Police.

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

for sake of balance even organisations that tend to attract nutcases still have plenty of members that are more growl than bite. That said I would rightfully expect the government to clamp down now. the excusing or reasoning away of any brand of extremism, muslim, right wing or otherwise is reprehensible. anyone choosing to go down the road of becoming affiliated with these groups should expect that they will be watched closely.

Edited by blackpalacefan (17 Jun 2016 9.55pm)

not needed Matthew.

As for medical science assessing cases of homicidal lunacy, I don't know. Maybe the pre cogs from Philip K Dicks Minority report are actually real.
Your suggestion, although a great idea, is unrealistic in real life.

The Mental Health Act 1983 has the powers for people to be "sectioned".

In essence,someone is examined by two or three "professionals",ie doctor and appropriately qualified social worker and detained if necessary for their health and safety or for the protection of other people.

I've seen it in action on a number of occasions and on any analysis its an inherently subjective process trying to balance public safety against private rights and v difficult trying to tell in advance who will "go over the top" and who won't..

One thing is for sure,the resources available in this area have been severely affected by recent years by cuts and a starting point would be to put some serious money back into front line mental health "prevention" services.

Thought provoking reaction to the reaction from Alan Gibbons author.

The media response to the death of Jo Cox is wretched. It is typified by Deborah Orr in the Guardian: “Understanding this tragedy needs nuance, not agendas” and even worse, Matthew Parris in The Times: “The Lesson of Jo Cox’s Death? There isn’t one.” Thomas Mair was a loner, vulnerable, timid, mentally ill, disturbed, deranged, acres of newspaper print tells us. The accumulating evidence that he had been a subscriber to Nazi periodicals, had manuals showing how to make weapons, and had a house stacked with Nazi memorabilia is seen as evidence of psychological disturbance, not political allegiance. Similarly, the role of right wing politicians from Cameron with his ‘swarms’ of immigrants and a ‘bunch of migrants’ to Johnson’s many racialised comments and Farage’s racist poster, is downplayed in the rush to say we have all got to be nice to each other and politicians must not be criticised in case some ‘lone wolf’ is encouraged to act violently.
People quite correctly hesitate to draw firm conclusions too early, but hold on a minute, at the same stage in the Lee Rigby tragedy, the same media had come to the firm conclusion that this was down to political Islam, even though Michael Adebowale also had psychotic incidents. Mental illness is not synonymous with violence. The mentally ill are far more likely to be victims of violence than its perpetrators.
The press has failed to locate Mair’s horrific attack within the narrative of neo-Nazi violence: the US hosted hate sites, Redwatch targeting the Left for attack, the numerous NF, BNP, EDL, Infidels thugs convicted of violent attacks, David Copeland who blew up a pub in Soho, Anders Breivik who slaughtered members of a left wing party in Norway, the Nazis doing time (some from Yorkshire) for having bomb-making equipment in their homes, the Britain First keyboard warriors who pollute the internet with their hate memes. Yes, some of the perpetrators were disturbed, but neo-Nazi violence attracts the violent, obsessive and narcissistic criminals. There is so much evidence to demonstrate this.
That is what has been missing so far in the coverage. Evidence. The media had a duty to explain all the possible roots of this political murder. They do it every time there is a ‘jihadi’ attack and they do it with unhesitating alacrity. There is time for them to inform the public about the far right’s violent history. It is not too late.

Why are you posting this stuff?

All I'm thinking about is how that poor lady suffered in her final moments and the sheer unfathomable cruelty and savagery of the maniac who killed her.

Your little crusade to prove a Nazi uprising is quite pathetic in the circumstances.
No one who did the things that this man did to a helpless woman is sane and I don't give a s*** if he was hiding Adolf Hitler in his en suite.