This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
W12 08 Jul 22 8.22pm | |
---|---|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jul 22 11.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
What's that then? (other than all these basement dwelling youtubers you like to bang on about) They are certainly pot stirring self-opinionated wise boys with too much time on their hands, but no. I mean the likes of the odious Tucker Carlson.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jul 22 11.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
Because if it's on Wikipedia it must be true. No, but it also doesn't mean it isn't true. You weigh up the arguments, look at the evidence presented, and decide who is telling the truth. As anyone can edit Wiki there is nothing to stop anyone posting their own version. That they don't ought to be instructive.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Jul 22 12.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
[Tweet Link] This is, unsurprisingly, seriously misleading. The guy did not suggest that the vaccines were harmful in any way at all, only that the overall benefit to controlling the spread had not been as much as anticipated. This is some of what really happened:- "When Søren Brostrøm arranged the ‘Go’ evening Live on TV 2 on Wednesday night, he was asked if it was a mistake to vaccinate a child. – With what we know today: yes. With what we knew then: no, was the answer. At the press conference earlier Wednesday, Søren Brostrøm also said that it was clear to us that the vaccines were not particularly preventive, but rather prevented serious illness, and that we must therefore now “take the learning further”:
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Jul 22 1.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
More loonies They cite a paper showing that SARS RNA can possibly be reversed to DNA. They use this as evidence that it could also possibly happen with the vaccine. So, disingenuous at best. And with this being the case, again why isn't your focus that it's Covid itself that may be primarily in the frame (or possibly to cause this, rather the the vaccination? Well likely because you're creaming yourself over a silly panel show and take that as gospel rather than ever researching anything that counters your stance. What on earth is this topic irrelevant, ludicious echo chamber obssesion all about? Maybe it's comforting for both you and the political groomers hand shandying you - since you're one of the few drifting down their echo chambers - but believe me pal this mental, purposeless and nuance detached behaviour doesn't help you or those around you. Edited by BlueJay (09 Jul 2022 2.05am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jul 22 8.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No, but it also doesn't mean it isn't true. You weigh up the arguments, look at the evidence presented, and decide who is telling the truth. As anyone can edit Wiki there is nothing to stop anyone posting their own version. That they don't ought to be instructive. That's not accurate. Wiki edits are reported and then an 'approved' edit team will decide upon whether the edit stays, is itself edited or is deleted. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jul 2022 8.14am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Jul 22 8.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
That's not accurate. Wiki edits are reported and then an 'approved' edit team will decide upon whether the edit stays, is itself edited or is deleted. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jul 2022 8.14am) Only checked to ensure that an edit meets the legal standards and contain no abusive language or libel.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 09 Jul 22 9.03am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Only checked to ensure that an edit meets the legal standards and contain no abusive language or libel. There are plenty of complaints about the left wing bias of Wiki editors.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 09 Jul 22 10.14am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
This is, unsurprisingly, seriously misleading. The guy did not suggest that the vaccines were harmful in any way at all, only that the overall benefit to controlling the spread had not been as much as anticipated. This is some of what really happened:- "When Søren Brostrøm arranged the ‘Go’ evening Live on TV 2 on Wednesday night, he was asked if it was a mistake to vaccinate a child. – With what we know today: yes. With what we knew then: no, was the answer. At the press conference earlier Wednesday, Søren Brostrøm also said that it was clear to us that the vaccines were not particularly preventive, but rather prevented serious illness, and that we must therefore now “take the learning further”: From the same article: "Countless millions of children who have to live with this “ohps!” the rest of his life, but somehow this concession from Brostrøm must make everything good again. It is always fascinating to see how some people assess what constitutes a safe rule. One can apparently commit mass genocide, and then later say oh, sorry, we just did not know – and everything disappears. If a person did that, he would be brought to justice for crimes against humanity. In Denmark, the government claimed that all children aged five and up needed to be stabbed, not because the shots wanted to protect them, but apparently to “ensure epidemic control” across the country"
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 09 Jul 22 10.55am | |
---|---|
A critical view of the Covid response.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jul 22 11.52am | |
---|---|
An excellent article.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Jul 22 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
There are plenty of complaints about the left wing bias of Wiki editors. Only from those on the right, though. People who see anything not in line with them, or even further to the right, as "left wing bias". I am a centralist and I don't see any bias. I think it's balanced, objective and fair.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.