This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Dubai Eagle 18 Jul 21 7.25pm | |
---|---|
Employ some of the Peterborough scouting network ? Originally posted by MikeCrete
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Jul 21 7.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
Employ some of the Peterborough scouting network ? In recent seasons Peterborough signed Ivan Toney for 300K and sold him to Brentford for a fee which could reach £10 Mill.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
taylors lovechild 18 Jul 21 7.43pm | |
---|---|
So the rumours are Everton are going to sign Townsend, Demarai Gray and Begovic. If they wanted to soften the Everton fans up to the idea of Benitez what a fabulous way of doing it!!! Good luck to Andros though. A genuinely nice guy and deserves another PL deal. However, he must be pinching himself while using the other hand to send laughing face emojis to Wilf.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 18 Jul 21 7.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
In recent seasons Peterborough signed Ivan Toney for 300K and sold him to Brentford for a fee which could reach £10 Mill. Good luck to them, and to Brentford, and whoever else turns a profit by giving players a chance, but not too many players on this list, or the ones Brentford sold, or anyone else for that matter proved themselves to be a premier league player. When folk call for us to sign the scouting team from x lower league club, I can't help but think three things: 1. The number of lower league and non league players who could make it to the championship is far, far higher than the number who could make it to the Premier league. We need the latter. 2. Peterborough, Brentford or whoever getting to the better lower and non league players before us is not only because we are far less likely to do well from that market than them, it's because generally Premier league teams need championship teams to act as a filter. If a quarter of the players who go from lower levels to the championship end up good enough for the top flight, that's three quarters who don't. For us to have signed the players who stepped up from the championship successfully directly from the lower leagues (so Watkins from Exeter etc) we'd also need to have signed all the ones who weren't good enough. Doesn't work. 3. When we were in the Championship, we DID sign bargains from the lower leagues. The reason we don't do much now is not because we've lost the knack (it's literally the same people now as then), it's because the task has changed significantly.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 18 Jul 21 8.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by TheBigToePunt
Good luck to them, and to Brentford, and whoever else turns a profit by giving players a chance, but not too many players on this list, or the ones Brentford sold, or anyone else for that matter proved themselves to be a premier league player. When folk call for us to sign the scouting team from x lower league club, I can't help but think three things: 1. The number of lower league and non league players who could make it to the championship is far, far higher than the number who could make it to the Premier league. We need the latter. 2. Peterborough, Brentford or whoever getting to the better lower and non league players before us is not only because we are far less likely to do well from that market than them, it's because generally Premier league teams need championship teams to act as a filter. If a quarter of the players who go from lower levels to the championship end up good enough for the top flight, that's three quarters who don't. For us to have signed the players who stepped up from the championship successfully directly from the lower leagues (so Watkins from Exeter etc) we'd also need to have signed all the ones who weren't good enough. Doesn't work. 3. When we were in the Championship, we DID sign bargains from the lower leagues. The reason we don't do much now is not because we've lost the knack (it's literally the same people now as then), it's because the task has changed significantly.
I'm really looking forward to this season.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jacey 22 Jul 21 11.39am | |
---|---|
Lost Townsend,now Cahill has rejected a new deal. Short sightedness by SP??
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 22 Jul 21 11.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jacey
Lost Townsend,now Cahill has rejected a new deal. Short sightedness by SP?? We can't have it both ways. How many posts on here over the last year or two complained that we had an old, moderately performing and slightly overpaid, slow squad with no resale value? Or that the youth players weren't getting a chance?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 22 Jul 21 12.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jacey
Lost Townsend,now Cahill has rejected a new deal. Short sightedness by SP?? Not at all. He was offered what we thought he was worth. In my opinion his best playing days are well behind him although Cahill would have been useful for his experience when required. But that doesn't justify meeting his financial demands
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
beak croydon 22 Jul 21 12.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jacey
Lost Townsend,now Cahill has rejected a new deal. Short sightedness by SP?? Cahill is far to slow look at the Liverpool 7-0. Cahill got 3.91 from the BBC fan vote in thingy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
samprior Hamburg 22 Jul 21 12.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by NEILLO
Not at all. He was offered what we thought he was worth. In my opinion his best playing days are well behind him although Cahill would have been useful for his experience when required. But that doesn't justify meeting his financial demands Yes this sums it up... his experience for the new young CBs would have been great, but it would have to be on our terms. I can't blame him for taking one last shot at glory with Rangers but it will be a loss even if that's just in the dressing room.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 22 Jul 21 12.21pm | |
---|---|
Cahill is/was a great player and it would be great to have him again next season if only for the experience he can bring to the squad.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 22 Jul 21 12.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jacey
Lost Townsend,now Cahill has rejected a new deal. Short sightedness by SP?? I would be surprised if Rangers can match our offer of money, maybe it's the glory or a longer contract?
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.