This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 28 Sep 15 1.36pm | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 28 Sep 2015 12.38pm
Quote dannyh at 28 Sep 2015 12.06pm
So why would such a uniform of a british serviceman cause "trouble" and who would cause such trouble ? Because, sadly, there are some idiots in our society. Dangerous idiots, too. You've been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan so you should know better than most. Unfortunately, and whether we like it or not, they have some sympathisers in the free world, including over here. There's not much we can do about it. We can and should remove said idiots. Quote dannyh at 28 Sep 2015 12.06pm
Why should the Service men have to be moved out of sight to upease the situation, why not tell the offended if you don't like it move where you can't see him, or better still fcuk off completely ? Because the nurse didn't know who the potentially offended were. I'm quite sure if she'd been able to see, say, two or three trouble makers then hospital security would have removed them. She simply made a judgment call based on previous experience that a uniform might (stress: might) cause trouble and therefore she decided to mitigate the risk by asking the soldier to sit elsewhere. Was that the right thing to do? I would say probably, on balance, no. Our instinctive reaction should be to put pride in our military first. But I can still understand why she did it, and I'm not going to criticise her for doing what she thought was the right thing. If you have to blame someone, it's the society that shaped the individuals involved in this incident and not the individuals themselves. So what you are saying is essentially she moved the soldier out of view in case anyone was offended, that's even bloody worse, I can undertstand (not agree) with him being moved if there were some bearded goat f***ers in the waiting area, however you imply there was not so moved the nurse moved him " just in case " someone got offended. That is outrageous. Quote dannyh at 28 Sep 2015 12.06pm
The fact that the service person was asked to move at all (because of potentially causing offence) is an absolute direct f***ing liberty and a reflextion of the apologistic ashamed to be british pussy holes that are now rife in our society. While I wouldn't use your language, I would agree totally that her decision is a reflection of an unwelcome trend in our society. I still don't blame the nurse but you are absolutely right in thinking her behaviour reflects how we are today. And I agree, it's not right. Quote dannyh at 28 Sep 2015 12.06pm
I think somene mentioned how Lee Rigby has got nothing to do with this ? It has everything to do with this, we have become afraid/ashamed of our own troops, flag, and social habbits that they may offend johnny foriegner so we hide away like timid little mice, IN OUR OWN f***ING COUNTRY. A great many of the Jihadist Johnny Foreigners you refer to are, in fact, English. I believe it's on UK passports that they depart for Syria to join ISIS. With regard to Lee Rigby, I recall he was treated like a hero and in the aftermath of that awful incident, he was accorded huge respect from the general public. I also think that while as a society we have become intimidated by the threat of terrorism, we have NOT lost respect for our military. But many have become scared to show their respect, as the hospital incident suggests.
Quote dannyh at 28 Sep 2015 12.06pm
Well not me I will wear my uniform with pride, I am Proud to be in the Armed Forces, Proud that I served in Iraq and Afgahnistan, proud of the flag of St George, and proud that I live in a mainly multicutural Britain where most people just want to get along. And so you should be. Quote dannyh at 28 Sep 2015 12.06pm
I welcome anyone to tell me to hide my uniform, I would suggest you are out of Punching range when you do. I seriously doubt you would punch a young, well intentioned nurse in the face for politely trying to do what she thought was right. If you did, you'd be a disgrace to the military and as a serving soldier, I doubt you are that. I would never hit a female full stop no matter the provocation. However the fact remains she felt complelled to place the serviceman second in her priorities. Not sure there was any need for the afters in your post ...if you did etc etc. What she did is reflective of the pressure society feels to upease the gobs***e miniorities and how easy it is for people to be branded a racist just for liking and being proud of their own country. That is the real issue here. And there's a few on here that exhibit that same nausiating apologistic trait. Edited by sydtheeagle (28 Sep 2015 12.41pm)
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 28 Sep 15 1.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote Jimenez at 28 Sep 2015 12.43pm
Quote Kermit8 at 28 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 28 Sep 2015 11.49am
Quote aquickgame2 at 28 Sep 2015 11.46am
What a state our country has become that a serving soldier has to be asked to leave/hide/get out the way/whatever it was because he was in uniform, from a hospital. Spent a lot of time in the States recently,guaranteed this would not ever happen over there,he would most probably gone to first in the queue.
The USA as a nation are proud of their serving soldiers, whereas we seem to have an underclass of apologists as well as foreign nationals continually having a pop.
"Vietnam, as opposed to the World War II, was a deeply unpopular war. American public, as a result, tried their best to forget about it and tended to forget its veterans as well. Although most of veterans succeeded in making the transition to civilian life, many did not. About 150,000 came home wounded or amputated, while at least 21,000 were permanently disabled and unable to work for the rest of their lives. Even worse, they did not receive proper and necessary help. The majority of Vietnam veterans came from low-income, working-class households. They could not even afford private health care services, thereby having no choice but to be treated in dirty public hospitals. Many veterans returned home not only with physical pains but also with psychological problems. They still experienced depression, flashbacks, nightmares, loneliness and inability to get close to others. Those mental problems that many veterans suffered were named as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). According to a study, almost 700,000 Vietnam veterans returned home with PTSD. However, the Veterans Administration did not recognize its existence until 1979. Beside medical treatment, earning money for living also was a big problem for these veterans. Each Vietnam veteran was offered 200 USD a month, too little in compared to the WWII veterans, who were supported by the government not only on their living expenses but also on college tuition. Around 250,000 Vietnam veterans could not find a job after finishing their military services. Some of them committed crimes. Within 10 years after returning home, 25 percent of Vietnam veterans was arrested on criminal charges. Because they had to endure so much pain and even felt abandoned by the their own people and country, more than 100,000 Vietnam veterans (the actual number would be even much higher) committed suicide after the war, which is nearly two times the number of soldiers had died in Vietnam."
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 28 Sep 15 1.47pm | |
---|---|
Quote dannyh at 28 Sep 2015 1.36pm
We can and should remove said idiots. But how do we identify all of them? Also, if they're British, on what grounds do we remove them? You're a serving soldier. Isn't freedom of speech and democracy what you're protecting? Disgusting as the way some people use their freedom of speech, is we're a better society for tolerating it. Previous regimes that have followed your suggestion haven't ended very well. So what you are saying is essentially she moved the soldier out of view in case anyone was offended, that's even bloody worse, I can undertstand (not agree) with him being moved if there were some bearded goat f***ers in the waiting area, however you imply there was not so moved the nurse moved him " just in case " someone got offended. That is outrageous. Yes, that is what I was saying. And it IS outrageous. We don't disagree with each other. But you overlook my point which is that the argument here is against a society that produces that sort of thinking; not against the nurse. I have not backed what she did; merely sought to understand it in context. She did the wrong thing for what seemed to her like the right reason. My argument is that a lot of the anger here is mis-directed. Oh really well have a gander at this then Obviously not a very edifying read but there's always an exception that proves the rule. I don't think Greenwich Council represents the nation's views on the military. Edited by sydtheeagle (28 Sep 2015 1.48pm)
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 28 Sep 15 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 28 Sep 2015 1.41pm
Quote Jimenez at 28 Sep 2015 12.43pm
Quote Kermit8 at 28 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 28 Sep 2015 11.49am
Quote aquickgame2 at 28 Sep 2015 11.46am
What a state our country has become that a serving soldier has to be asked to leave/hide/get out the way/whatever it was because he was in uniform, from a hospital. Spent a lot of time in the States recently,guaranteed this would not ever happen over there,he would most probably gone to first in the queue.
The USA as a nation are proud of their serving soldiers, whereas we seem to have an underclass of apologists as well as foreign nationals continually having a pop.
"Vietnam, as opposed to the World War II, was a deeply unpopular war. American public, as a result, tried their best to forget about it and tended to forget its veterans as well. Although most of veterans succeeded in making the transition to civilian life, many did not. About 150,000 came home wounded or amputated, while at least 21,000 were permanently disabled and unable to work for the rest of their lives. Even worse, they did not receive proper and necessary help. The majority of Vietnam veterans came from low-income, working-class households. They could not even afford private health care services, thereby having no choice but to be treated in dirty public hospitals. Many veterans returned home not only with physical pains but also with psychological problems. They still experienced depression, flashbacks, nightmares, loneliness and inability to get close to others. Those mental problems that many veterans suffered were named as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). According to a study, almost 700,000 Vietnam veterans returned home with PTSD. However, the Veterans Administration did not recognize its existence until 1979. Beside medical treatment, earning money for living also was a big problem for these veterans. Each Vietnam veteran was offered 200 USD a month, too little in compared to the WWII veterans, who were supported by the government not only on their living expenses but also on college tuition. Around 250,000 Vietnam veterans could not find a job after finishing their military services. Some of them committed crimes. Within 10 years after returning home, 25 percent of Vietnam veterans was arrested on criminal charges. Because they had to endure so much pain and even felt abandoned by the their own people and country, more than 100,000 Vietnam veterans (the actual number would be even much higher) committed suicide after the war, which is nearly two times the number of soldiers had died in Vietnam."
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 28 Sep 15 2.02pm | |
---|---|
Having been out in town, when a number of Squaddies are in town (Aldershot), its not always the case that people in uniform are showing a great deal of respect to the uniform, service and public - and that there can be a reasonable basis on occasion for separating them from the general public. Whilst I know that many people have a rosy eyed romantic view that people who serve in the military are upright valiant symbols of the finest men and women in society, that's not always the experience of the general public, and that even on occasion they can be a real menace in society. I mean squaddies kicking off is unheard of (or people kicking off with Squaddies because they want to prove themselves).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 28 Sep 15 2.05pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 Sep 2015 2.02pm
Having been out in town, when a number of Squaddies are in town (Aldershot), its not always the case that people in uniform are showing a great deal of respect to the uniform, service and public - and that there can be a reasonable basis on occasion for separating them from the general public. Whilst I know that many people have a rosy eyed romantic view that people who serve in the military are upright valiant symbols of the finest men and women in society, that's not always the experience of the general public, and that even on occasion they can be a real menace in society. I mean squaddies kicking off is unheard of (or people kicking off with Squaddies because they want to prove themselves). I can understand what you mean but in all fairness I doubt the RAF serviceman was going on a pub crawl/civvy bashing when he was injured and in hospital. Not really the RAF thing anyway: more for the Paras, the Chunkies and the Grunts.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 28 Sep 15 2.29pm | |
---|---|
Quote Jimenez at 28 Sep 2015 1.52pm
Quote Kermit8 at 28 Sep 2015 1.41pm
Quote Jimenez at 28 Sep 2015 12.43pm
Quote Kermit8 at 28 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 28 Sep 2015 11.49am
Quote aquickgame2 at 28 Sep 2015 11.46am
What a state our country has become that a serving soldier has to be asked to leave/hide/get out the way/whatever it was because he was in uniform, from a hospital. Spent a lot of time in the States recently,guaranteed this would not ever happen over there,he would most probably gone to first in the queue.
The USA as a nation are proud of their serving soldiers, whereas we seem to have an underclass of apologists as well as foreign nationals continually having a pop.
"Vietnam, as opposed to the World War II, was a deeply unpopular war. American public, as a result, tried their best to forget about it and tended to forget its veterans as well. Although most of veterans succeeded in making the transition to civilian life, many did not. About 150,000 came home wounded or amputated, while at least 21,000 were permanently disabled and unable to work for the rest of their lives. Even worse, they did not receive proper and necessary help. The majority of Vietnam veterans came from low-income, working-class households. They could not even afford private health care services, thereby having no choice but to be treated in dirty public hospitals. Many veterans returned home not only with physical pains but also with psychological problems. They still experienced depression, flashbacks, nightmares, loneliness and inability to get close to others. Those mental problems that many veterans suffered were named as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). According to a study, almost 700,000 Vietnam veterans returned home with PTSD. However, the Veterans Administration did not recognize its existence until 1979. Beside medical treatment, earning money for living also was a big problem for these veterans. Each Vietnam veteran was offered 200 USD a month, too little in compared to the WWII veterans, who were supported by the government not only on their living expenses but also on college tuition. Around 250,000 Vietnam veterans could not find a job after finishing their military services. Some of them committed crimes. Within 10 years after returning home, 25 percent of Vietnam veterans was arrested on criminal charges. Because they had to endure so much pain and even felt abandoned by the their own people and country, more than 100,000 Vietnam veterans (the actual number would be even much higher) committed suicide after the war, which is nearly two times the number of soldiers had died in Vietnam."
Costa? £3 for a corporate coffee? Yeah, right. See you down there my half-Scot cuz.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 28 Sep 15 3.02pm | |
---|---|
Quote ASCPFC at 28 Sep 2015 2.05pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 Sep 2015 2.02pm
Having been out in town, when a number of Squaddies are in town (Aldershot), its not always the case that people in uniform are showing a great deal of respect to the uniform, service and public - and that there can be a reasonable basis on occasion for separating them from the general public. Whilst I know that many people have a rosy eyed romantic view that people who serve in the military are upright valiant symbols of the finest men and women in society, that's not always the experience of the general public, and that even on occasion they can be a real menace in society. I mean squaddies kicking off is unheard of (or people kicking off with Squaddies because they want to prove themselves). I can understand what you mean but in all fairness I doubt the RAF serviceman was going on a pub crawl/civvy bashing when he was injured and in hospital. Not really the RAF thing anyway: more for the Paras, the Chunkies and the Grunts. True, and I agree he was treated badly, but the degree of reaction as if somehow an act of treason has occurred, is itself an overreaction, divorced from reality.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
susmik PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 28 Sep 15 3.18pm | |
---|---|
Quote ASCPFC at 28 Sep 2015 2.05pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 Sep 2015 2.02pm
Having been out in town, when a number of Squaddies are in town (Aldershot), its not always the case that people in uniform are showing a great deal of respect to the uniform, service and public - and that there can be a reasonable basis on occasion for separating them from the general public. Whilst I know that many people have a rosy eyed romantic view that people who serve in the military are upright valiant symbols of the finest men and women in society, that's not always the experience of the general public, and that even on occasion they can be a real menace in society. I mean squaddies kicking off is unheard of (or people kicking off with Squaddies because they want to prove themselves). I can understand what you mean but in all fairness I doubt the RAF serviceman was going on a pub crawl/civvy bashing when he was injured and in hospital. Not really the RAF thing anyway: more for the Paras, the Chunkies and the Grunts. He was injured on a training exercise which is a bit different to a pub crawl!
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 28 Sep 15 3.22pm | |
---|---|
Quote susmik at 28 Sep 2015 3.18pm
Quote ASCPFC at 28 Sep 2015 2.05pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 Sep 2015 2.02pm
Having been out in town, when a number of Squaddies are in town (Aldershot), its not always the case that people in uniform are showing a great deal of respect to the uniform, service and public - and that there can be a reasonable basis on occasion for separating them from the general public. Whilst I know that many people have a rosy eyed romantic view that people who serve in the military are upright valiant symbols of the finest men and women in society, that's not always the experience of the general public, and that even on occasion they can be a real menace in society. I mean squaddies kicking off is unheard of (or people kicking off with Squaddies because they want to prove themselves). I can understand what you mean but in all fairness I doubt the RAF serviceman was going on a pub crawl/civvy bashing when he was injured and in hospital. Not really the RAF thing anyway: more for the Paras, the Chunkies and the Grunts. He was injured on a training exercise which is a bit different to a pub crawl! Yes, but that's not really what I'm concerned with here, I think we can all agree that the actions of the hospital were wrong and insulting.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 28 Sep 15 3.26pm | |
---|---|
Not to go off point or let anyone reveal any 'state secrets' but I thought we were above 'Black Alpha' at present. I.e no uniforms or identifying items outside the barracks at present due to security circumstances. I bet Google have just uploaded my harddrive.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 28 Sep 15 6.21pm | |
---|---|
Quote ASCPFC at 28 Sep 2015 3.26pm
Not to go off point or let anyone reveal any 'state secrets' but I thought we were above 'Black Alpha' at present. I.e no uniforms or identifying items outside the barracks at present due to security circumstances. I bet Google have just uploaded my harddrive.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.