This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
blackpalacefan 28 Jun 16 11.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nhp61
I wish they would invoke Article 50 and just get on with it. I am sick of Remainers' demands for a second referendum, Richard Branson wanting a rerun, Jamie f***ing Oliver sticking his stupid oar in, David Lammy, Sturgeon, the w***ers claiming they aren't British but are European, and all the other dickheads who are messing their knickers in outrage. The Remainers are bleating that the Leave camp told lies. Are they deliberately forgetting the crap the Remain team came out with, WW3 breaking out if we left the EU, for example? The country voted out. They should just accept that. We'd be at even more of a negotiating disadvantage if we enacted it immediately. Think about the country, not if Jamie Oliver is annoying you. Come on. I would be more concerned that Daniel Hannan, Boris Johnson and co have both rowed back on freedom of movement as an issue of importance. In short, will will leave the EU? Most likely. Will immigration suddenly be cut? No, it's very likely to be the same as before. That's the reality you're trying to rush along. That is your prize.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 28 Jun 16 11.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by blackpalacefan
We'd be at even more of a negotiating disadvantage if we enacted it immediately. Think about the country, not if Jamie Oliver is annoying you. Come on. I would be more concerned that Daniel Hannan, Boris Johnson and co have both rowed back on freedom of movement as an issue of importance. In short, will will leave the EU? Most likely. Will immigration suddenly be cut? No, it's very likely to be the same as before.That's the reality you're trying to rush along. That is your prize.
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
blackpalacefan 28 Jun 16 11.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by -TUX-
I too would like for everyone to get their way. That being that although we'll leave the EU 1 - the economy will be as strong as ever and 2 - we'll have control of our borders. It seems likely though that neither of those things will be achieved in tandem. Or if one has to be dropped it will not be further economic instability. By the time negotiations are in full flow, we'll be biting off their hand to accept EEA. It really is logically, very very likely to be the outcome. People will be unhappy, but that's life. If the powers that be can find a way to return to business as usual they will. They won't see this result as acknowledgement that we need to listen to the people, they will ensure that in future such decisions as out of our hands. Edited by blackpalacefan (28 Jun 2016 11.34pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 28 Jun 16 11.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by blackpalacefan
I too would like for everyone to get their way. That being that although we'll leave the EU 1 - the economy will be as strong as ever and 2 - we'll have control of our borders. It seems likely though that neither of those things will be achieved in tandem. Or if one has to be dropped it will not be further economic instability. By the time negotiations are in full flow, we'll be biting off their hand to accept EEA. It really is logically, very very likely to be the outcome. People will be unhappy, but that's life. If the powers that be can find a way to return to business as usual they will. They won't see this result as acknowledgement that we need to listen to the people, they will ensure that in future such decisions as out of our hands.
Edited by blackpalacefan (28 Jun 2016 11.34pm) We sing from the same song-sheet bud. I just wish more would open their eyes.
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
blackpalacefan 28 Jun 16 11.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by -TUX-
We sing from the same song-sheet bud. I just wish more would open their eyes. Yes, its inevitable really. We already see the likes of vodafone [Link] , seimens [Link] and ryan air [Link] publicly putting pressure on achieving the right brexit deal outcome so god only knows whats going on behind the scenes. The likes of Boris and Theresa will say what they think people want to hear while thinking to themselves 'youve had your say plebs' and will then neatly slip back into the grasp of corporations, that if anything have more of a grip than the EU because they know no borders. That people have are naive enough not to see this coming is astounding.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 29 Jun 16 9.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyh
So your saying that without the EU the upper class's are going to run a mock. Jesus H Christ is it any wonder Matt takes the piss sometimes when he is (relatively speaking) forced to defend his view points against such utter anti leave cobblers as your Wolfie Smith style rant. Swivel eyed remainers is the title of thread, not a perosnal invitation.
Yes, I may be wrong. But you can't argue with the demographics. We do have an ageing population which benefits the Tory right. Scotland may go, which does remove that bulwark to the right. And any opposition south of the border is fractioned and in disarray. Things may change. The Tories may split into right and left; the left [i.e. centre right - keep up] may merge with the Libs thus creating an effective centrist opposition; the left may actually get its act together and absorb the greens etc.. That would achieve what I want - a healthy democracy with all its proper checks and balances. And in terms of the elite, I did not mean old money. The new front bench may be stuffed with those from Oxbridge and the Clarendon Schools. However, the new aristocracy exists at the upper echelons of the City of London. They finance the Tory party and dominate the primary source of wealth for this country. As such, they run the place. Not wholly bad of course. People who generate enormous wealth deserve to be rich; their bounty does filter down; and it is not something you are born to - anyone can technically aspire [although that is likely to become more difficult as the division in wealth widens]. On the other hand, our recent history has thrown up many excesses and corruptions. Power needs its restraints in order to function properly for the benefit of many rather than only serving those in control. Despite all its faults, the EU did place regulations seeking to achieve just that. How long before they are freed from those irritating shackles by those they bank roll? You said that everyone knows the EU benefits the elite. That suggests that leaving will remove those benefits for the elite so far as this country is concerned. Actually, it will remove from one elite and give to another.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 29 Jun 16 10.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
And in terms of the elite, I did not mean old money. The new front bench may be stuffed with those from Oxbridge and the Clarendon Schools. However, the new aristocracy exists at the upper echelons of the City of London. They finance the Tory party and dominate the primary source of wealth for this country. As such, they run the place. Not wholly bad of course. People who generate enormous wealth deserve to be rich; their bounty does filter down; and it is not something you are born to - anyone can technically aspire [although that is likely to become more difficult as the division in wealth widens]. On the other hand, our recent history has thrown up many excesses and corruptions. Power needs its restraints in order to function properly for the benefit of many rather than only serving those in control. Despite all its faults, the EU did place regulations seeking to achieve just that. How long before they are freed from those irritating shackles by those they bank roll? You said that everyone knows the EU benefits the elite. That suggests that leaving will remove those benefits for the elite so far as this country is concerned. Actually, it will remove from one elite and give to another. Since when did 'trickle down economics' really work and not widen the gap?
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 30 Jun 16 9.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Yes, I may be wrong. But you can't argue with the demographics. We do have an ageing population which benefits the Tory right. Scotland may go, which does remove that bulwark to the right. And any opposition south of the border is fractioned and in disarray. Things may change. The Tories may split into right and left; the left [i.e. centre right - keep up] may merge with the Libs thus creating an effective centrist opposition; the left may actually get its act together and absorb the greens etc.. That would achieve what I want - a healthy democracy with all its proper checks and balances. And in terms of the elite, I did not mean old money. The new front bench may be stuffed with those from Oxbridge and the Clarendon Schools. However, the new aristocracy exists at the upper echelons of the City of London. They finance the Tory party and dominate the primary source of wealth for this country. As such, they run the place. Not wholly bad of course. People who generate enormous wealth deserve to be rich; their bounty does filter down; and it is not something you are born to - anyone can technically aspire [although that is likely to become more difficult as the division in wealth widens]. On the other hand, our recent history has thrown up many excesses and corruptions. Power needs its restraints in order to function properly for the benefit of many rather than only serving those in control. Despite all its faults, the EU did place regulations seeking to achieve just that. How long before they are freed from those irritating shackles by those they bank roll? You said that everyone knows the EU benefits the elite. That suggests that leaving will remove those benefits for the elite so far as this country is concerned. Actually, it will remove from one elite and give to another. Correct. No I didn't by the way. Edited by dannyh (30 Jun 2016 11.11am)
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 30 Jun 16 10.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyh
Correct. I blame myself for debating with somebody who genuinely knows absolutely nothing.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ta11berg birmingham 30 Jun 16 11.01am | |
---|---|
Far too many on all sides believe they have voted for all sorts of stuff, including the one about lowering migration. I suggest we remember that voting slip and the alternatives there. Only leave or remain, we are in the hands of our unelected leader now, and as long as we can be said to have left, it can be said to have acted on the referendum
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 30 Jun 16 11.09am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
I blame myself for debating with somebody who genuinely knows absolutely nothing. Ahhhh the remain camps last resort, insult anyone who doesn't agree as "knowing nothing". Oh and just something for you to chew on, the FTSE is higher now than it was pre Brexit. And all that articulate cobblers you wrote, was just your own meandering opinion which has no basis in reality (other than in your mind) and is no more important or correct than anyone else's. However the remain campaign seem only to be able to mock those who don't agree with them as plebs, I would argue that the indifference to others opinions the remain camp has shown, is the exact reason why you lost the vote "indifference" to others, something you and others on these pages have shown in abundance. To accuse someone, you know nothing about of "genuinely knowing nothing" is supercilious and ignorant again another "trait" or "reason" the remain camp lost the vote. Anyway copperbottom, sorry Silvertop, enjoy your day. I know I will.
Edited by dannyh (30 Jun 2016 11.28am)
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Jun 16 11.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by blackpalacefan
We'd be at even more of a negotiating disadvantage if we enacted it immediately. Think about the country, not if Jamie Oliver is annoying you. Come on. We may be at a greater disadvantage the longer we leave it as well. The problem of the Leave leaders was promoting a false aura of certainity that everything would pan out how they said it would. Which of course was a fiction. Granted, the remain weren't above deceit, but as they didn't win, they don't now have to deliver on that deceit. Where as the leavers, are showing true colours, backpeddling on promises as mistakes, compromising issues such as freedom of movement and both parties seem to be tearing themselves apart. The problem of British politics, has always been that people think that it can work just by telling the voter what they want to hear, and then doing what they want. But its a different age now. Everything is recorded and known, communication is instant, and people can communicate easily across geographic boundaries. The economy will be fine has become it will recover in time. The EU needs us more than we need it, is we must remain connected to the common market, uncontrolled immigration has become accepting that it may be necessary to retain freedom of movement to protect the economy. Originally posted by blackpalacefan
I would be more concerned that Daniel Hannan, Boris Johnson and co have both rowed back on freedom of movement as an issue of importance. In short, will will leave the EU? Most likely. Will immigration suddenly be cut? No, it's very likely to be the same as before. That's the reality you're trying to rush along. That is your prize. Absolutely, and Farage must be worried, given how closely he aligned himself with the Conservative leave. A failure to deliver on Freedom of Movement, could cost both parties dear at the next election. The problem is, that waiting might not work out better either. It the EU markets stablise faster than the UKs, then their position becomes far stronger and they can probably outlast the UK anyhow. Of course there is the chance that the UK recovers quickly, but the problem is its like holding a potential flush, with one card left to turn over. Its a gamble, because despite what people are saying 'we are through the looking glass' here and in unpredicatable waters, no one really can accurately predict how things will turn out, because there are no real precidents. No one really expect the exit to have an impact on so many other international currencies and markets, which won't engender much good will either.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.