You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > A representation of Islamic UK attitudes 2015
November 23 2024 8.00pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

A representation of Islamic UK attitudes 2015

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 10 of 15 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

  

Stirlingsays Flag 28 Nov 15 12.26pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 28 Nov 2015 12.05pm

WW2 created the circumstances but the Jewish ideal was always to return to the Biblical promised land.
Israel has no real basis in history, it is purely a Biblical and therefore religious myth.
If there was ever a substantial Jewish homeland it was not modern day Israel. Religion was entirely responsible for the concept and the reality of Jewish settlement.

To say the war created the circumstances and then say religion was entirely responsible are contradictions.

The Jews historically came from that area...I'm not arguing here about the decision the UN came up with and the British implemented. I'm replying to the assertion that religion is 'entirely responsible'.

I think a better way to phrase it is to say 'group identity'. Religion wasn't and isn't a significant factor for many Jews in moving to Palestine....A real understanding of Judaism understands that it is an extremely broad religion which is practiced in the same way that Buddhism embraces both the religious but also the secular.

You have your religious Jews and you have your secular Jews.....Many of them think they have a right to a life in Israel.


Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2015 12.27pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 28 Nov 15 1.40pm

Quote mcduh at 28 Nov 2015 11.33am

What's my opinion again?

If you were going to say "It's bad when Palace supporters start generalizing massive swaths of humanity based on extremist hyperviolence and sensationalist media brainbaiting..."

You'd be pretty close.


If this is a reply to me.... did you get my Nickelback joke?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
mcduh Flag 28 Nov 15 6.10pm Send a Private Message to mcduh Add mcduh as a friend

Quote Hoof Hearted at 28 Nov 2015 1.40pm

If this is a reply to me.... did you get my Nickelback joke?


Do I need to be sent to the Western Provinces for inculcation and reeducation if I didn't?????? Drat.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 29 Nov 15 9.07am

Quote mcduh at 28 Nov 2015 6.10pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 28 Nov 2015 1.40pm

If this is a reply to me.... did you get my Nickelback joke?


Do I need to be sent to the Western Provinces for inculcation and reeducation if I didn't?????? Drat.


No... but it would give me a warm glow to think that maybe I amused someone rather than p1ssed them off (which I seem to do quite a lot on here!)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 29 Nov 15 12.11pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote Stirlingsays at 28 Nov 2015 12.26pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 28 Nov 2015 12.05pm

WW2 created the circumstances but the Jewish ideal was always to return to the Biblical promised land.
Israel has no real basis in history, it is purely a Biblical and therefore religious myth.
If there was ever a substantial Jewish homeland it was not modern day Israel. Religion was entirely responsible for the concept and the reality of Jewish settlement.

To say the war created the circumstances and then say religion was entirely responsible are contradictions.

The Jews historically came from that area...I'm not arguing here about the decision the UN came up with and the British implemented. I'm replying to the assertion that religion is 'entirely responsible'.

I think a better way to phrase it is to say 'group identity'. Religion wasn't and isn't a significant factor for many Jews in moving to Palestine....A real understanding of Judaism understands that it is an extremely broad religion which is practiced in the same way that Buddhism embraces both the religious but also the secular.

You have your religious Jews and you have your secular Jews.....Many of them think they have a right to a life in Israel.


Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2015 12.27pm)


I'm sorry but that cannot be true. They moved to that area specifically because of the Biblical story. There are plenty of other places they could have gone.

If the Bible is not a religious book and therefore a religious reason to move to Palestine then I don't know what is.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
mcduh Flag 29 Nov 15 4.45pm Send a Private Message to mcduh Add mcduh as a friend

Quote Hoof Hearted at 29 Nov 2015 9.07am

No... but it would give me a warm glow to think that maybe I amused someone rather than p1ssed them off (which I seem to do quite a lot on here!)


Tres amusant, me brudda! =D

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
johnfirewall Flag 29 Nov 15 7.06pm Send a Private Message to johnfirewall Add johnfirewall as a friend

How many Palestinian Muslims are in the UK? Because I'm not sure how relevant Israel is to this debate. Less so than Saudi Arabia anyway.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 29 Nov 15 11.20pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Nov 2015 12.11pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 28 Nov 2015 12.26pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 28 Nov 2015 12.05pm

WW2 created the circumstances but the Jewish ideal was always to return to the Biblical promised land.
Israel has no real basis in history, it is purely a Biblical and therefore religious myth.
If there was ever a substantial Jewish homeland it was not modern day Israel. Religion was entirely responsible for the concept and the reality of Jewish settlement.

To say the war created the circumstances and then say religion was entirely responsible are contradictions.

The Jews historically came from that area...I'm not arguing here about the decision the UN came up with and the British implemented. I'm replying to the assertion that religion is 'entirely responsible'.

I think a better way to phrase it is to say 'group identity'. Religion wasn't and isn't a significant factor for many Jews in moving to Palestine....A real understanding of Judaism understands that it is an extremely broad religion which is practiced in the same way that Buddhism embraces both the religious but also the secular.

You have your religious Jews and you have your secular Jews.....Many of them think they have a right to a life in Israel.


Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2015 12.27pm)


I'm sorry but that cannot be true. They moved to that area specifically because of the Biblical story. There are plenty of other places they could have gone.

If the Bible is not a religious book and therefore a religious reason to move to Palestine then I don't know what is.


You are grouping everyone's motivations together. Jews originated in Palestine. That's true whether you are bothered by the old testament or not.

Many Jews felt vulnerable after WW2, there are plenty of secular Jews who moved to Palestine.

You seem to be ignoring the fact that secular Jews exist, which is surprising because Israel is full of them.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 30 Nov 15 3.10am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

If as a Jew, practising or otherwise, you decide to move to Israel there has to be a motive. If you are of sain mind and body you just wouldn't move to somewhere like that unless you were driven by your faith, or your belief that Palestine should not exist.

It's not ex pats moving to Marbella for a bit of sun somewhere where there are other Brits.

This is a war torn part of the world, people constantly die there,, I just cant see as Jew you would move there.

It'd be like chosing to move to the Falls road in NI circa 1980 just for sh1ts and giggles.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 30 Nov 15 9.58am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Nov 2015 12.11pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 28 Nov 2015 12.26pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 28 Nov 2015 12.05pm

WW2 created the circumstances but the Jewish ideal was always to return to the Biblical promised land.
Israel has no real basis in history, it is purely a Biblical and therefore religious myth.
If there was ever a substantial Jewish homeland it was not modern day Israel. Religion was entirely responsible for the concept and the reality of Jewish settlement.

To say the war created the circumstances and then say religion was entirely responsible are contradictions.

The Jews historically came from that area...I'm not arguing here about the decision the UN came up with and the British implemented. I'm replying to the assertion that religion is 'entirely responsible'.

I think a better way to phrase it is to say 'group identity'. Religion wasn't and isn't a significant factor for many Jews in moving to Palestine....A real understanding of Judaism understands that it is an extremely broad religion which is practiced in the same way that Buddhism embraces both the religious but also the secular.

You have your religious Jews and you have your secular Jews.....Many of them think they have a right to a life in Israel.


Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2015 12.27pm)


I'm sorry but that cannot be true. They moved to that area specifically because of the Biblical story. There are plenty of other places they could have gone.

If the Bible is not a religious book and therefore a religious reason to move to Palestine then I don't know what is.

The Torah is the holy book of the Judaism. Whilst the bibles old testament is sourced in the Torah and history of the Jewish tribes, it is not a complete adaption etc.

The Biblical Story is the Christian version of the stories and myths of the Jewish tribes prior to the new testament.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 30 Nov 15 10.01am

Quote Stirlingsays at 29 Nov 2015 11.20pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Nov 2015 12.11pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 28 Nov 2015 12.26pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 28 Nov 2015 12.05pm

WW2 created the circumstances but the Jewish ideal was always to return to the Biblical promised land.
Israel has no real basis in history, it is purely a Biblical and therefore religious myth.
If there was ever a substantial Jewish homeland it was not modern day Israel. Religion was entirely responsible for the concept and the reality of Jewish settlement.

To say the war created the circumstances and then say religion was entirely responsible are contradictions.

The Jews historically came from that area...I'm not arguing here about the decision the UN came up with and the British implemented. I'm replying to the assertion that religion is 'entirely responsible'.

I think a better way to phrase it is to say 'group identity'. Religion wasn't and isn't a significant factor for many Jews in moving to Palestine....A real understanding of Judaism understands that it is an extremely broad religion which is practiced in the same way that Buddhism embraces both the religious but also the secular.

You have your religious Jews and you have your secular Jews.....Many of them think they have a right to a life in Israel.


Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2015 12.27pm)


I'm sorry but that cannot be true. They moved to that area specifically because of the Biblical story. There are plenty of other places they could have gone.

If the Bible is not a religious book and therefore a religious reason to move to Palestine then I don't know what is.


You are grouping everyone's motivations together. Jews originated in Palestine. That's true whether you are bothered by the old testament or not.

Many Jews felt vulnerable after WW2, there are plenty of secular Jews who moved to Palestine.

You seem to be ignoring the fact that secular Jews exist, which is surprising because Israel is full of them.

After the war there were a lot of armed jewish partisan and resistance groups comprising of Zionists. These groups specifically had organised and fought against the Nazi, and consequently following the war, many were in a position where they were the only Jewish people in area, and certainly the only organised ones.

Having fought against the Nazis, and being suitably equipped, many then went to what is now Israel with a view to establishing a homeland, using the tactics of guerrilla warfare they'd learned against the Nazis (and often from the Soviets) against the British (quite successfully).

Zionism is an unusual movement as it appeals to both secular and religious jews.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 30 Nov 15 10.18am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Nov 2015 9.58am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Nov 2015 12.11pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 28 Nov 2015 12.26pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 28 Nov 2015 12.05pm

WW2 created the circumstances but the Jewish ideal was always to return to the Biblical promised land.
Israel has no real basis in history, it is purely a Biblical and therefore religious myth.
If there was ever a substantial Jewish homeland it was not modern day Israel. Religion was entirely responsible for the concept and the reality of Jewish settlement.

To say the war created the circumstances and then say religion was entirely responsible are contradictions.

The Jews historically came from that area...I'm not arguing here about the decision the UN came up with and the British implemented. I'm replying to the assertion that religion is 'entirely responsible'.

I think a better way to phrase it is to say 'group identity'. Religion wasn't and isn't a significant factor for many Jews in moving to Palestine....A real understanding of Judaism understands that it is an extremely broad religion which is practiced in the same way that Buddhism embraces both the religious but also the secular.

You have your religious Jews and you have your secular Jews.....Many of them think they have a right to a life in Israel.


Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Nov 2015 12.27pm)


I'm sorry but that cannot be true. They moved to that area specifically because of the Biblical story. There are plenty of other places they could have gone.

If the Bible is not a religious book and therefore a religious reason to move to Palestine then I don't know what is.

The Torah is the holy book of the Judaism. Whilst the bibles old testament is sourced in the Torah and history of the Jewish tribes, it is not a complete adaption etc.

The Biblical Story is the Christian version of the stories and myths of the Jewish tribes prior to the new testament.


LOL you arguing over which holy book from which faith is more correct!

They're probably all complete bollocks and made up by someone who was afraid of dying.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 10 of 15 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > A representation of Islamic UK attitudes 2015