You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Nuclear fusion
November 23 2024 10.34am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Nuclear fusion

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

  

matt_himself Flag Matataland 17 Oct 16 8.32pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

A couple of weeks ago, something happened that truly might change mankind's future:

[Link]

This is momentous and hopefully, the development will continue.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 17 Oct 16 8.42pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by matt_himself

A couple of weeks ago, something happened that truly might change mankind's future:

[Link]

This is momentous and hopefully, the development will continue.

Good news for my mobile.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 18 Oct 16 9.37am

Originally posted by matt_himself

A couple of weeks ago, something happened that truly might change mankind's future:

[Link]

This is momentous and hopefully, the development will continue.

Arguably this would be one of two potential technologies that would completely change human perspectives of the world. This and nanotechnology could effectively create a new epoch of humankind

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
johnmcormick8 Flag Brundish 18 Oct 16 9.47am Send a Private Message to johnmcormick8 Add johnmcormick8 as a friend

Excellent news

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
richard shaw (og)65 Flag my minds eye 18 Oct 16 10.45am Send a Private Message to richard shaw (og)65 Add richard shaw (og)65 as a friend

amazing stuff , but isn't the problem with nuclear power the waste takes ages to cool down and be safe , or is this stuff different , it don't really say in the article

 


interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?"
iggy pop " I think I wiped out the 60`S "

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cb1969 Flag Back in the 'hood 18 Oct 16 10.50am Send a Private Message to cb1969 Add cb1969 as a friend

Great to see but we all know the oil companies will just buy the technology for billions to continue our reliance on fossil fuels

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 18 Oct 16 12.40pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by richard shaw (og)65

amazing stuff , but isn't the problem with nuclear power the waste takes ages to cool down and be safe , or is this stuff different , it don't really say in the article

I'm not an expert by any means but isn't it nuclear fission that causes the problems? I seem to recall that fusion is a different ball game altogether.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 18 Oct 16 12.51pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

I'm not an expert by any means but isn't it nuclear fission that causes the problems? I seem to recall that fusion is a different ball game altogether.

Yes, nuclear Fission generates far more radiation. The process of fission is splitting atoms, where as fusion if binding them together. The radiation particles produced as a result are much lower (also Fusion occurs in nature, whilst fission doesn't) as its the means by which stars burn.

The only thing I think approaching a fusion reaction is in the Hydrogen bomb with uses a fission trigger to generate something akin to a fusion reaction from the fission reaction.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 18 Oct 16 12.53pm

Originally posted by richard shaw (og)65

amazing stuff , but isn't the problem with nuclear power the waste takes ages to cool down and be safe , or is this stuff different , it don't really say in the article

Cool down might be an issue, as fusion whilst generating an enormous amount of energy from a reaction, requires a massive amount to energy to begin with (in nature, Fusion is what generates the heat of the sun).

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 18 Oct 16 1.05pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Yes, nuclear Fission generates far more radiation. The process of fission is splitting atoms, where as fusion if binding them together. The radiation particles produced as a result are much lower (also Fusion occurs in nature, whilst fission doesn't) as its the means by which stars burn.

The only thing I think approaching a fusion reaction is in the Hydrogen bomb with uses a fission trigger to generate something akin to a fusion reaction from the fission reaction.

Out of the entire HOL readership, I just knew it'd be you who came to my rescue.


 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
richard shaw (og)65 Flag my minds eye 18 Oct 16 1.29pm Send a Private Message to richard shaw (og)65 Add richard shaw (og)65 as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Cool down might be an issue, as fusion whilst generating an enormous amount of energy from a reaction, requires a massive amount to energy to begin with (in nature, Fusion is what generates the heat of the sun).

ok , makes sense , what I understand is the by product or waste from your bog standard nuclear power station are the rods that don't cool from their ridiculous temperature for ages . these things have to be stored in impenetrable concrete bunkers .so there must be some sort of waste that doesn't cool down with this new process , if not happy days

 


interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?"
iggy pop " I think I wiped out the 60`S "

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nairb75 Flag Baltimore 18 Oct 16 3.05pm Send a Private Message to nairb75 Add nairb75 as a friend

"Still, its record is likely to stand for some time - at least until 2032, when the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (better known as ITER) is due to open in the south of France."

such ambitious timelines!

Edited by nairb75 (18 Oct 2016 3.05pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Nuclear fusion