You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Virtual insanity?
November 23 2024 2.20pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Virtual insanity?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

  

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 03 Jun 16 8.49pm

[Link]

According to this bloke we are living in a virtual reality!
Thoughts?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
martinb75 Flag Tampere 03 Jun 16 9.08pm Send a Private Message to martinb75 Add martinb75 as a friend

Read it today - made my head hurt !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 03 Jun 16 9.17pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

[Link]

According to this bloke we are living in a virtual reality!
Thoughts?

GAY.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 03 Jun 16 9.25pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

GAY.

Erudite as usual Matthew. Is this homophobic or confessional?

Or perhaps you have thoughts on the whole nature of existence?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
bertshead Flag Castlederg 03 Jun 16 11.06pm

David Icke MkII

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 03 Jun 16 11.08pm

Originally posted by bertshead

David Icke MkII

Did he play in goal as well?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
bertshead Flag Castlederg 04 Jun 16 8.55pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Did he play in goal as well?

Doubt it but I'd send the c*** to Coventry.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Crystal_Clear Flag Belfast 04 Jun 16 9.53pm Send a Private Message to Crystal_Clear Add Crystal_Clear as a friend

Do you take the blue pill or the red pill ?

Do you want to see how far the foxhole goes ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 06 Jun 16 11.21am

The classic example of someone taking a metaphor too literally. There are some very well supported arguments about the nature of reality being a 'simulation' ala the Matrix (which is based on Jean Jean Bulldariad 'Simulacra and Simulation').

For example, we know that our own experience is in fact better viewed as a simulation of our external reality constructed from sensory data, than a direct representation of the truth. In effect what we see is constructed from sensory data, memories, expectations and prior experiences (light reflected of objects, creates stimulation of the retina, this reacts to certain frequencies of light, which creates neural impulses in the optic nerves that is then filtered through perception and translated into the experience of vision). This is true of all senses.

So in a manner of speaking, all our existence is at the very least a simulation created by our periphery and central nervous system and brains (its better to see the brain as multiple systems of interaction and functionality, than just one object).

The idea that its a 'Computer Simulation' in a literal sense, is pseudo-science, as one would need to demonstrate the existence of that system, and it would create the immediate question who built it, and are they part of a simulation.

There is some interesting multi-dimension physics on the nature of the universe being 'akin to a hologram' in higher dimensional spaces (but that doesn't mean its a literal hologram just that its a useful metaphor for explaining a very difficult concept to wrap our four dimensional perceptions around). This is heavy maths involved in topological geometry (like PHD level maths).

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 06 Jun 16 11.51am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

The classic example of someone taking a metaphor too literally. There are some very well supported arguments about the nature of reality being a 'simulation' ala the Matrix (which is based on Jean Jean Bulldariad 'Simulacra and Simulation').

For example, we know that our own experience is in fact better viewed as a simulation of our external reality constructed from sensory data, than a direct representation of the truth. In effect what we see is constructed from sensory data, memories, expectations and prior experiences (light reflected of objects, creates stimulation of the retina, this reacts to certain frequencies of light, which creates neural impulses in the optic nerves that is then filtered through perception and translated into the experience of vision). This is true of all senses.

So in a manner of speaking, all our existence is at the very least a simulation created by our periphery and central nervous system and brains (its better to see the brain as multiple systems of interaction and functionality, than just one object).

The idea that its a 'Computer Simulation' in a literal sense, is pseudo-science, as one would need to demonstrate the existence of that system, and it would create the immediate question who built it, and are they part of a simulation.

There is some interesting multi-dimension physics on the nature of the universe being 'akin to a hologram' in higher dimensional spaces (but that doesn't mean its a literal hologram just that its a useful metaphor for explaining a very difficult concept to wrap our four dimensional perceptions around). This is heavy maths involved in topological geometry (like PHD level maths).

Are you referring to the brakes theory of a multiverse?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 06 Jun 16 12.10pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Are you referring to the brakes theory of a multiverse?

Not sure, to be honest, I'm more talking about stuff I've read in 'Scientific American' etc.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 06 Jun 16 12.20pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Not sure, to be honest, I'm more talking about stuff I've read in 'Scientific American' etc.

Sorry there was a typo, should have been branes a derivative of the word membrane.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Virtual insanity?