This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 07 Dec 15 1.09pm | |
---|---|
Quelle Surprise...
Perhaps he has Ernest Saunders doctor ? Ernest Saunders by the way is still the only documented case of a man recovering from Alzheimers...they shouldn't have freed him they should have dissected him to further medical science Edited by The Sash (07 Dec 2015 1.13pm)
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 07 Dec 15 1.10pm | |
---|---|
Not another story about a f***ing Kardashian relative!
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Dweeb East London 13 Dec 15 4.33am | |
---|---|
Quote The Sash at 07 Dec 2015 1.09pm
Quelle Surprise...
Perhaps he has Ernest Saunders doctor ? Ernest Saunders by the way is still the only documented case of a man recovering from Alzheimers...they shouldn't have freed him they should have dissected him to further medical science Edited by The Sash (07 Dec 2015 1.13pm) It's amazing what drinking, I mean owning, Guinness does for you.
Taking the bungy jump since 1964. Never to see John Jackson in a shirt again Sorry to see Lee Hills go, did we ever see Alex Marrow? We did January 2013 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 14 Dec 15 12.26pm | |
---|---|
Strange how he is fit enough to still claim his 300 quid a day expenses from the Lords, yet unable to go to court for kiddie fiddling....MP's looking after their own again??? Looks that way! Outrageous decision AGAIN !
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 14 Dec 15 5.10pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stuk at 07 Dec 2015 1.10pm
Not another story about a f***ing Kardashian relative! I am not sure whether I should be pleased or embarrassed that it has taken me until today to get that joke
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Dec 15 5.37pm | |
---|---|
The old Saunders defence. I think that if someone actually impliments a diminished responsibility defence, like this, they should really be taken into protected treatment or care, just like they are if they're mentally ill.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Dec 15 5.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote the silurian at 14 Dec 2015 12.26pm
Strange how he is fit enough to still claim his 300 quid a day expenses from the Lords, yet unable to go to court for kiddie fiddling....MP's looking after their own again??? Looks that way! Outrageous decision AGAIN ! Good legal team, some medical experts, and you only have to show an reasonable case of dementia to establish the defence. Its a bit harsh that if your mentally ill, you could well end up spending 20 plus years in a secure hospital on a much less serious offence, even if you only got a couple of years, but if you have dementia you're basically free to go, and can collect your 200 pounds for passing go etc.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 14 Dec 15 6.08pm | |
---|---|
May I address the learned members of the "kangaroo" court? I'm not defending Janner.If he did what he's accused of,its plainly disgusting. But,and allowing for the jokes,there could be those who might say it reflects well upon our society that trials can#t proceed against those too ga ga to even understand the charges against them or properly instruct defence lawyers. "Four eminent clinicians examined Janner on 11 separate occasions throughout 2014 and 2015, the court heard. They found that due to severe dementia, Janner could no longer recognise his children and grandchildren; could not speak, write or watch television; and was reliant upon a carer for his safety and personal hygiene. *Judge) Openshaw said medical opinion was “all one way”. He said: “All tests have shown a progressive decline in his dementia, with an inevitable and irresistible conclusion that the defendant has advanced and disabling dementia that has deteriorated and is irreversible, and accordingly I find that he is unfit to plead.” Michael Kopelman, an expert in memory loss and a professor of neuropsychiatry at King’s College London, examined Janner four times on behalf of the Crown Prosecution Service. Summarising Kopelman’s most recent examination, in September this year, the judge said: “He can now hardly speak and when he does it is to make inappropriate, repetitive statements. He scarcely recognised his own family and he has entirely lost his short-term memory. He is unable to give any account of his professional and parliamentary history.” Dr Kate Humphreys, of St Thomas’ hospital in central London, who also carried out an assessment for the prosecution, said it had been impossible to complete cognitive tests because Janner’s condition was so poor." Be careful what you wish for before wanting the boundaries that protect us all from being stitched up by a kangaroo court to be eroded too much.Sure,they get abused but the greater interest is in the protections they afford us.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 14 Dec 15 6.25pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Dec 2015 5.41pm
Quote the silurian at 14 Dec 2015 12.26pm
Strange how he is fit enough to still claim his 300 quid a day expenses from the Lords, yet unable to go to court for kiddie fiddling....MP's looking after their own again??? Looks that way! Outrageous decision AGAIN ! Good legal team, some medical experts, and you only have to show an reasonable case of dementia to establish the defence. Its a bit harsh that if your mentally ill, you could well end up spending 20 plus years in a secure hospital on a much less serious offence, even if you only got a couple of years, but if you have dementia you're basically free to go, and can collect your 200 pounds for passing go etc.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 15 Dec 15 1.04am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 14 Dec 2015 6.08pm
May I address the learned members of the "kangaroo" court? I'm not defending Janner.If he did what he's accused of,its plainly disgusting. But,and allowing for the jokes,there could be those who might say it reflects well upon our society that trials can#t proceed against those too ga ga to even understand the charges against them or properly instruct defence lawyers. "Four eminent clinicians examined Janner on 11 separate occasions throughout 2014 and 2015, the court heard. They found that due to severe dementia, Janner could no longer recognise his children and grandchildren; could not speak, write or watch television; and was reliant upon a carer for his safety and personal hygiene. *Judge) Openshaw said medical opinion was “all one way”. He said: “All tests have shown a progressive decline in his dementia, with an inevitable and irresistible conclusion that the defendant has advanced and disabling dementia that has deteriorated and is irreversible, and accordingly I find that he is unfit to plead.” Michael Kopelman, an expert in memory loss and a professor of neuropsychiatry at King’s College London, examined Janner four times on behalf of the Crown Prosecution Service. Summarising Kopelman’s most recent examination, in September this year, the judge said: “He can now hardly speak and when he does it is to make inappropriate, repetitive statements. He scarcely recognised his own family and he has entirely lost his short-term memory. He is unable to give any account of his professional and parliamentary history.” Dr Kate Humphreys, of St Thomas’ hospital in central London, who also carried out an assessment for the prosecution, said it had been impossible to complete cognitive tests because Janner’s condition was so poor." Be careful what you wish for before wanting the boundaries that protect us all from being stitched up by a kangaroo court to be eroded too much.Sure,they get abused but the greater interest is in the protections they afford us.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 15 Dec 15 10.26am | |
---|---|
Quote Cucking Funt at 14 Dec 2015 6.25pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Dec 2015 5.41pm
Quote the silurian at 14 Dec 2015 12.26pm
Strange how he is fit enough to still claim his 300 quid a day expenses from the Lords, yet unable to go to court for kiddie fiddling....MP's looking after their own again??? Looks that way! Outrageous decision AGAIN ! Good legal team, some medical experts, and you only have to show an reasonable case of dementia to establish the defence. Its a bit harsh that if your mentally ill, you could well end up spending 20 plus years in a secure hospital on a much less serious offence, even if you only got a couple of years, but if you have dementia you're basically free to go, and can collect your 200 pounds for passing go etc.
Its a great medical defence, far better than insanity, as it doesn't involve being incarcerated in some form or another. There are people still in secure psychiatric wards ten years into a four year prison sentence. I don't doubt he is demented to the point of not being able to stand trial. Thing is though, if he was say schizophrenic, he'd still be dependent on recovery before being released into society - for the protection of society.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 15 Dec 15 12.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 14 Dec 2015 5.10pm
Quote Stuk at 07 Dec 2015 1.10pm
Not another story about a f***ing Kardashian relative! I am not sure whether I should be pleased or embarrassed that it has taken me until today to get that joke
I've never had so much hate for an entire family I know (thankfully) very little about. Other than they're all vacuous media c***s.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.