This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Palace Old Geezer Midhurst 15 Mar 21 2.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Palace Old Geezer
Well said BTP. This nonsense surely has now gone far enough. You're right to identify Phillips as a voice of reason. Seems to me like a common sense kind of guy. But, now we've got Haringey Council spending £186k to rename Black Boy Lane on their turf despite the residents being quite happy with it. Named after King Charles 11 and been there 300 years. Nonsense. Black is merely a colour - it's not racist. There's a Black Swan and a Black Horse pub near me. One of them 400 years old. Good too. Hope they don't feel obliged to rename them. My local is the White Horse. Is that alright? Sorry, nothing to do with Wolf, who I've supported on his stand in other threads, but the same issue I feel.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
taylors lovechild 15 Mar 21 6.21pm | |
---|---|
Maybe Wilf noticed that people seem to be getting far more upset about kneeling than they were about racism and thought 'What's the point?'
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Palace Old Geezer Midhurst 15 Mar 21 7.28pm | |
---|---|
Almost certainly Wilf could sense there was a growing unrest about the way that kneeling was losing it's impact. His lonely 'stand tall' approach must have been difficult for him, but it sure did make a statement.
Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 15 Mar 21 7.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by scarlet
Great to see a Palace player leading the way. All lives matter. If he was white he couldn't do it without severe repercussion and that shows you how broken the idea is. This will probably be killed by the pcers but hey. ??? He didn't do it to specifically say all lives matter.... he did it to say that talk is cheap... getting on a knee is the most some people do, which isn't enough... actions speak louder than words.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Crazy_Eagle South London 16 Mar 21 6.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by scarlet
Great to see a Palace player leading the way. All lives matter. If he was white he couldn't do it without severe repercussion and that shows you how broken the idea is. This will probably be killed by the pcers but hey. ??? I very, very much doubt Zaha was thinking 'All Lives Matters' in his head. Good for Zaha on standing up (literally), although I wonder what he would think to see comments like this. The whole All Lives Matter response completely misses the point of why players are taking the knee.
R.I.P. DJ Hardline CPFC2010 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CT Charlie 17 Mar 21 3.23pm | |
---|---|
Isn't the BLM movement simply a way of trying to cast a light on the fact that it's more difficult for Blacks (and others) to make their way through life than Whites? That racism is real? And that these things shouldn't be so? In my opinion, social justice is about ensuring that not only the laws of a society but that the PEOPLE of a society follow the Golden Rule in both action and attitude. Whenever I have the opportunity to engage a critic of BLM, I simply ask them this: Would you prefer to have been born black or white? Why? Until their answer is, "In this culture/country, it really makes no difference whatsoever," I think we ought to keep working, individually and collectively, to effect change.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TheBigToePunt 17 Mar 21 4.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by CT Charlie
Isn't the BLM movement simply a way of trying to cast a light on the fact that it's more difficult for Blacks (and others) to make their way through life than Whites? That racism is real? And that these things shouldn't be so? In my opinion, social justice is about ensuring that not only the laws of a society but that the PEOPLE of a society follow the Golden Rule in both action and attitude. Whenever I have the opportunity to engage a critic of BLM, I simply ask them this: Would you prefer to have been born black or white? Why? Until their answer is, "In this culture/country, it really makes no difference whatsoever," I think we ought to keep working, individually and collectively, to effect change. Well, my answer to your question would be ‘I have seen no evidence that in this culture/country, one’s race makes a significant difference whatsoever to ones life chances, despite having read BLMs website on more than one occasion’. I would then ask you (and it would be a sincere, genuine question) to show me evidence of societal racism in action. Where is the network or pattern across our social institutions or cultures? I would press you for something systemic, corporate, common or widespread, rather than instances or examples of racism, however awful they may be. My criticism of BLM is that they appear unable to make that distinction. My criticism of the BBC et al is that they refuse to even acknowledge how vital it is to do so. A society that has some racists in it is not the same as a racist society, and the solution depends very much on an accurate prognosis of the problem. To return to Wilf, he has experienced nasty, s***ty social media trolls. I haven't heard him speak of anything beyond that. Against which you have the evidence of the Zaha’s, a black African family who came to the UK and got access to work, housing, education, health, and a safe, structured and secure society in which they did better than they would have done in the Ivory Coast. It wasn’t easy for them (Wilf has spoken about being evicted as a kid), but it’s not easy for most of us. Weigh up Wilf’s negative (racist) experiences against the positives. Where is the argument that his life is materially harder than any person receiving threats or abuse on line, of whom there are thousands all the time? I would certainly listen to what you had to tell me, because I can’t find anything of substance in BLM to consider. I would also ask you to understand that the notion of Britain as a racist society is at odds with my own experience, and frankly a bit offensive to me as one part of that society. I am a white working class male from a traditional background, who likes football, the pub, and all the usual stuff, but who also went to Uni, and got a career in a relatively intellectual profession where I have worked at managerial level for a long time. My work affects places and people directly and indirectly. As a working class lad with a middle class life I have a foot in both of the camps where one might look to find racism, and all I can say is that if it pervades then I’ve missed the memo. I might also ask when it became OK to accuse a society of being racist to the point that change must be made without proving it?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 17 Mar 21 5.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by TheBigToePunt
Well, my answer to your question would be ‘I have seen no evidence that in this culture/country, one’s race makes a significant difference whatsoever to ones life chances, despite having read BLMs website on more than one occasion’. I would then ask you (and it would be a sincere, genuine question) to show me evidence of societal racism in action. Where is the network or pattern across our social institutions or cultures? I would press you for something systemic, corporate, common or widespread, rather than instances or examples of racism, however awful they may be. My criticism of BLM is that they appear unable to make that distinction. My criticism of the BBC et al is that they refuse to even acknowledge how vital it is to do so. A society that has some racists in it is not the same as a racist society, and the solution depends very much on an accurate prognosis of the problem. To return to Wilf, he has experienced nasty, s***ty social media trolls. I haven't heard him speak of anything beyond that. Against which you have the evidence of the Zaha’s, a black African family who came to the UK and got access to work, housing, education, health, and a safe, structured and secure society in which they did better than they would have done in the Ivory Coast. It wasn’t easy for them (Wilf has spoken about being evicted as a kid), but it’s not easy for most of us. Weigh up Wilf’s negative (racist) experiences against the positives. Where is the argument that his life is materially harder than any person receiving threats or abuse on line, of whom there are thousands all the time? I would certainly listen to what you had to tell me, because I can’t find anything of substance in BLM to consider. I would also ask you to understand that the notion of Britain as a racist society is at odds with my own experience, and frankly a bit offensive to me as one part of that society. I am a white working class male from a traditional background, who likes football, the pub, and all the usual stuff, but who also went to Uni, and got a career in a relatively intellectual profession where I have worked at managerial level for a long time. My work affects places and people directly and indirectly. As a working class lad with a middle class life I have a foot in both of the camps where one might look to find racism, and all I can say is that if it pervades then I’ve missed the memo. I might also ask when it became OK to accuse a society of being racist to the point that change must be made without proving it? Well said. Personally I’m sick to death of being told I’m fundamentally racist because I don’t actively support my accusers. It’s the most ridiculous argument I’ve ever heard.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Davepalace707 Northumberland 17 Mar 21 6.04pm | |
---|---|
Yep. 100pc
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 18 Mar 21 7.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Personally I’m sick to death of being told I’m fundamentally racist because I don’t actively support my accusers. It’s the most ridiculous argument I’ve ever heard. Indeed. I wonder how long it will be before we are told that people who didn't support the illegal Sarah Everard vigil are all rapists
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tickled pink Cornwall 18 Mar 21 7.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by JRW2
I don't know whether that was meant to be patronising but it clearly looks like it. But I'm about to go down the same path. I only got round to viewing Roy post-WBA last night and I was really struck by how fluently he speaks. He embarks on lengthy sentences and you wonder where they're leading, but he reaches the end with everything nicely tied up. What he has to say is sensible, interesting, wise and balanced. And I've never heard a manager (or player!) throw in some Latin (sine qua non). Our manager is no fool, shame too many fans only see what they want to see.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tickled pink Cornwall 18 Mar 21 8.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by TheBigToePunt
Well, my answer to your question would be ‘I have seen no evidence that in this culture/country, one’s race makes a significant difference whatsoever to ones life chances, despite having read BLMs website on more than one occasion’. I would then ask you (and it would be a sincere, genuine question) to show me evidence of societal racism in action. Where is the network or pattern across our social institutions or cultures? I would press you for something systemic, corporate, common or widespread, rather than instances or examples of racism, however awful they may be. My criticism of BLM is that they appear unable to make that distinction. My criticism of the BBC et al is that they refuse to even acknowledge how vital it is to do so. A society that has some racists in it is not the same as a racist society, and the solution depends very much on an accurate prognosis of the problem. To return to Wilf, he has experienced nasty, s***ty social media trolls. I haven't heard him speak of anything beyond that. Against which you have the evidence of the Zaha’s, a black African family who came to the UK and got access to work, housing, education, health, and a safe, structured and secure society in which they did better than they would have done in the Ivory Coast. It wasn’t easy for them (Wilf has spoken about being evicted as a kid), but it’s not easy for most of us. Weigh up Wilf’s negative (racist) experiences against the positives. Where is the argument that his life is materially harder than any person receiving threats or abuse on line, of whom there are thousands all the time? I would certainly listen to what you had to tell me, because I can’t find anything of substance in BLM to consider. I would also ask you to understand that the notion of Britain as a racist society is at odds with my own experience, and frankly a bit offensive to me as one part of that society. I am a white working class male from a traditional background, who likes football, the pub, and all the usual stuff, but who also went to Uni, and got a career in a relatively intellectual profession where I have worked at managerial level for a long time. My work affects places and people directly and indirectly. As a working class lad with a middle class life I have a foot in both of the camps where one might look to find racism, and all I can say is that if it pervades then I’ve missed the memo. I might also ask when it became OK to accuse a society of being racist to the point that change must be made without proving it? Nice post, time is the healer and we haven't had anywhere near enough of it yet, meanwhile as a country we continue with attempting to show to way.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.