This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
paedo gang
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
  Hrolf The Ganger  14 Sep 15 1.26pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves. These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Sep 15 3.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm
I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves. These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that. No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'. Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 14 Sep 15 3.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm
I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves. These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that. No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'. Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.
And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims. Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 15 Sep 15 10.42am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 3.41pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm
I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves. These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that. No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'. Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.
And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims. Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain. It pretty much sums up the failures of not just the 21st century Britain, but 20th century Britain, just trade the term 'fear of racism' for 'fear of celebrity' or 'fear of influence' and you have the Savile Scandal and the Politic abuse of the likes of Smith and Heath et al. The sad situation is that as long as 'you don't get caught' it seems to have been perfectly acceptable to allow child sex offenders (and sex offenders) to be protected and isolated from even reasonable investigation.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 15 Sep 15 11.17am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 10.42am
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 3.41pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm
I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves. These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that. No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'. Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.
And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims. Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain. It pretty much sums up the failures of not just the 21st century Britain, but 20th century Britain, just trade the term 'fear of racism' for 'fear of celebrity' or 'fear of influence' and you have the Savile Scandal and the Politic abuse of the likes of Smith and Heath et al. The sad situation is that as long as 'you don't get caught' it seems to have been perfectly acceptable to allow child sex offenders (and sex offenders) to be protected and isolated from even reasonable investigation.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 15 Sep 15 11.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 15 Sep 2015 11.17am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 10.42am
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 3.41pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm
I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves. These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that. No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'. Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.
And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims. Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain. It pretty much sums up the failures of not just the 21st century Britain, but 20th century Britain, just trade the term 'fear of racism' for 'fear of celebrity' or 'fear of influence' and you have the Savile Scandal and the Politic abuse of the likes of Smith and Heath et al. The sad situation is that as long as 'you don't get caught' it seems to have been perfectly acceptable to allow child sex offenders (and sex offenders) to be protected and isolated from even reasonable investigation.
Agreed, there is definitely a difference between being an abuser and unlawful sexual intercourse. That said, if the man has a history of 'just accidently picking up young girls who lie about their age in a club'...
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 15 Sep 15 1.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 11.46am
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 15 Sep 2015 11.17am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 10.42am
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 3.41pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm
I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves. These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that. No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'. Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.
And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims. Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain. It pretty much sums up the failures of not just the 21st century Britain, but 20th century Britain, just trade the term 'fear of racism' for 'fear of celebrity' or 'fear of influence' and you have the Savile Scandal and the Politic abuse of the likes of Smith and Heath et al. The sad situation is that as long as 'you don't get caught' it seems to have been perfectly acceptable to allow child sex offenders (and sex offenders) to be protected and isolated from even reasonable investigation.
Agreed, there is definitely a difference between being an abuser and unlawful sexual intercourse. That said, if the man has a history of 'just accidently picking up young girls who lie about their age in a club'... ...then he probably worked for the BBC in the 70's.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.