This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Ted Heath ex Prime Minister
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 martinb75  Tampere 05 Aug 15 12.20pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Nonce case, nonce case, hang him hang him hang him.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Johnny Eagles  berlin 05 Aug 15 2.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote johnno42000 at 05 Aug 2015 11.40am
Quote becky at 05 Aug 2015 6.46am
What puzzles me is why they are spending so much time and using up police resources (when they can't now even attend a burglary) on digging up the dirt on a man who died 10 years ago....... hardly likely to get a conviction now are they? Edited by becky (05 Aug 2015 6.46am) Shouldn't the crimes be investigated as there could be people who are alive today who could be linked and guilty? There are certainly victims who are alive that would like to see these vile people investigated. I've got nothing against them being investigated per se, but when - as Becky pointed out - you've got the head of the NPCC coming out and saying the police are basically not interested in muggings, burglaries, car break-ins, shoplifting, possession of drugs, dangerous driving, vandalism, drunken disorderliness... the list goes on. When the police say this stuff is too unimportant to be on the radar, then I think citizens have a right to feel a bit short-changed when FOUR (count them) police forces find they do have the resources to investigate allegations about Ted Heath (for which there is very little concrete evidence in the public domain.)
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
johnno42000  05 Aug 15 2.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Johnny Eagles at 05 Aug 2015 2.15pm
Quote johnno42000 at 05 Aug 2015 11.40am
Quote becky at 05 Aug 2015 6.46am
What puzzles me is why they are spending so much time and using up police resources (when they can't now even attend a burglary) on digging up the dirt on a man who died 10 years ago....... hardly likely to get a conviction now are they? Edited by becky (05 Aug 2015 6.46am) Shouldn't the crimes be investigated as there could be people who are alive today who could be linked and guilty? There are certainly victims who are alive that would like to see these vile people investigated. I've got nothing against them being investigated per se, but when - as Becky pointed out - you've got the head of the NPCC coming out and saying the police are basically not interested in muggings, burglaries, car break-ins, shoplifting, possession of drugs, dangerous driving, vandalism, drunken disorderliness... the list goes on. When the police say this stuff is too unimportant to be on the radar, then I think citizens have a right to feel a bit short-changed when FOUR (count them) police forces find they do have the resources to investigate allegations about Ted Heath (for which there is very little concrete evidence in the public domain.) Don't really understand the bit about the public domain. It would make the investigation incredibly easy if the information were readily available in the public domain but as this ex-whip indicated things regarding scandals with small boys were hushed up. [Link] The part about the police not investigating certain crimes is down to resources being cut. If you keep doing this things we once regarded as the normal state of affairs will be hit.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Eustace H. Plimsoll  Aldershot 05 Aug 15 8.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Yet another disgusting f***ing member of that evil lowlife scumbag clan, not deserving to have ever drawn breath. Sickening. And on top of his political leanings, possibly a nonce too. Yuk! (Ay thang yaw...)
As a woman, I can step aside, or step up my game... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 06 Aug 15 4.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Johnny Eagles at 05 Aug 2015 2.15pm
Quote johnno42000 at 05 Aug 2015 11.40am
Quote becky at 05 Aug 2015 6.46am
What puzzles me is why they are spending so much time and using up police resources (when they can't now even attend a burglary) on digging up the dirt on a man who died 10 years ago....... hardly likely to get a conviction now are they? Edited by becky (05 Aug 2015 6.46am) Shouldn't the crimes be investigated as there could be people who are alive today who could be linked and guilty? There are certainly victims who are alive that would like to see these vile people investigated. I've got nothing against them being investigated per se, but when - as Becky pointed out - you've got the head of the NPCC coming out and saying the police are basically not interested in muggings, burglaries, car break-ins, shoplifting, possession of drugs, dangerous driving, vandalism, drunken disorderliness... the list goes on. When the police say this stuff is too unimportant to be on the radar, then I think citizens have a right to feel a bit short-changed when FOUR (count them) police forces find they do have the resources to investigate allegations about Ted Heath (for which there is very little concrete evidence in the public domain.) Budget cuts, its much easier and cost effective to investigate someone who won't need to be interviewed, cautioned, tried, imprisoned, appeal etc than someone who would. Plus its a good source of crime statistics, as you can pin a load of crimes on one person, without actually having to prove it in court. Most of the investigating will be cheap too, interviews, so its just manpower. Meanwhile, a B+E is a nightmare. You've got the officer responding, specialist crime unit (Detectives and Forensics), statements, witness reports and follow up. Likely as not, you've got to hope the individual is in the system for something. Otherwise its an unsolved, on record as a statistic (so lots of admin costs) Then when you do get someone, likely as not you need to appoint a solicitor, conduct more interviews, even more paperwork and admin bring in CPS, officer needs to make a court apperance and the magistrates court to get a minor conviction, of six months (prison costs now apply) or if it goes big, you've got to now attend crown court, provide a judge and jury, more admin, more apperances, more costs. Then the appeals and sentence reviews, prison costs etc... Dead nonses are the police dream. Couple of officers time, a few interviews, some CPS meetings and a meeting with legal (to make sure you don't push it too far and end up getting sued). Throw out some platitudes and compensation for not believing them at the time, and go on record as solving a load of sex crimes, admittedly ones you just added to the system, but ones that will obfuscate your actual clearance rate.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 06 Aug 15 4.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote johnno42000 at 05 Aug 2015 2.41pm
Quote Johnny Eagles at 05 Aug 2015 2.15pm
Quote johnno42000 at 05 Aug 2015 11.40am
Quote becky at 05 Aug 2015 6.46am
What puzzles me is why they are spending so much time and using up police resources (when they can't now even attend a burglary) on digging up the dirt on a man who died 10 years ago....... hardly likely to get a conviction now are they? Edited by becky (05 Aug 2015 6.46am) Shouldn't the crimes be investigated as there could be people who are alive today who could be linked and guilty? There are certainly victims who are alive that would like to see these vile people investigated. I've got nothing against them being investigated per se, but when - as Becky pointed out - you've got the head of the NPCC coming out and saying the police are basically not interested in muggings, burglaries, car break-ins, shoplifting, possession of drugs, dangerous driving, vandalism, drunken disorderliness... the list goes on. When the police say this stuff is too unimportant to be on the radar, then I think citizens have a right to feel a bit short-changed when FOUR (count them) police forces find they do have the resources to investigate allegations about Ted Heath (for which there is very little concrete evidence in the public domain.) Don't really understand the bit about the public domain. It would make the investigation incredibly easy if the information were readily available in the public domain but as this ex-whip indicated things regarding scandals with small boys were hushed up. [Link] The part about the police not investigating certain crimes is down to resources being cut. If you keep doing this things we once regarded as the normal state of affairs will be hit. In fairness, looking back, it doesn't seem that the Police were necessarily investigating crimes back then either. I'd rather the police focused on crimes like rape of a minor, conspiracy to procure a child for sexual abuse, and assorted sex offences against children than say drunk and disorderly, drug offences, public order offences. After all, its important to remember, that children were being raped.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| johnno42000 06 Aug 15 4.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Aug 2015 4.26pm
Quote johnno42000 at 05 Aug 2015 2.41pm
Quote Johnny Eagles at 05 Aug 2015 2.15pm
Quote johnno42000 at 05 Aug 2015 11.40am
Quote becky at 05 Aug 2015 6.46am
What puzzles me is why they are spending so much time and using up police resources (when they can't now even attend a burglary) on digging up the dirt on a man who died 10 years ago....... hardly likely to get a conviction now are they? Edited by becky (05 Aug 2015 6.46am) Shouldn't the crimes be investigated as there could be people who are alive today who could be linked and guilty? There are certainly victims who are alive that would like to see these vile people investigated. I've got nothing against them being investigated per se, but when - as Becky pointed out - you've got the head of the NPCC coming out and saying the police are basically not interested in muggings, burglaries, car break-ins, shoplifting, possession of drugs, dangerous driving, vandalism, drunken disorderliness... the list goes on. When the police say this stuff is too unimportant to be on the radar, then I think citizens have a right to feel a bit short-changed when FOUR (count them) police forces find they do have the resources to investigate allegations about Ted Heath (for which there is very little concrete evidence in the public domain.) Don't really understand the bit about the public domain. It would make the investigation incredibly easy if the information were readily available in the public domain but as this ex-whip indicated things regarding scandals with small boys were hushed up. [Link] The part about the police not investigating certain crimes is down to resources being cut. If you keep doing this things we once regarded as the normal state of affairs will be hit. In fairness, looking back, it doesn't seem that the Police were necessarily investigating crimes back then either. I'd rather the police focused on crimes like rape of a minor, conspiracy to procure a child for sexual abuse, and assorted sex offences against children than say drunk and disorderly, drug offences, public order offences. After all, its important to remember, that children were being raped. Very fair point although it does seem that some investigation was done but not followed through with for whatever reasons (and I really hope these reasons come out).
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| kingdowieonthewall Sussex, ex-Cronx. 06 Aug 15 5.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
How about they get on with it in the northern towns right now, where the nonces are busy grooming young girls(with utter contempt for the law), rather than bothering with dead old cunce.
Kids,tired of being bothered by your pesky parents? |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 06 Aug 15 6.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote kingdowieonthewall at 06 Aug 2015 5.27pm
How about they get on with it in the northern towns right now, where the nonces are busy grooming young girls(with utter contempt for the law), rather than bothering with dead old cunce. Its not a shocking waste if you were a victim. Your first point does not preclude the second
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.