From what I read the Judge did not even get to consider the evidence, but dismissed the case because there were procedural errors. Why the CPS did not spot them is a mystery for that is their role. Saving Court time when weaknesses make it likely a prosecution is going to fail because of insufficient evidence or errors.

The Judge did not look at this in any way, neutral or not. I hope the Police will be more careful the next time because there is bound to be a next time. It’s what he does.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

He was the right kind of defendant so the establishment were itching to get him. I have repeatedly said I can't stand TR but the CPS and the police failed completely in this case.

The CPS does tend to pursue cases where they think the public will be outraged if they don't. That is all well and good but you also need evidence.

I was on a jury regarding a sexual assault case I kept waiting for the evidence but over a 5 day trial we had lots of prosecution witnesses who actually made the case not for the prosecution but for the defence. That and the victim was obviously lying about all or certainly key parts of her statement.

The CPS should never have taken it to court but no doubt stung by the complaints about low prosecution rates they thought they would chance their arm.

Poor show by the CPS and the police, doesn't anybody read this stuff?

One more point

So their beliefs don’t affect their actions ? if you seriously don’t get the coincidence then you arnt that bright, i think you do but cannot bring yourself to admit you are wrong.

Wrong.

There are things I don't like about Robinson but he is persecuted for doing what a lot of people are frightened of doing....which is challenging the state on what they have done.

So they go after him and make a special case to persecute him on anything they can.

The people who destroyed what existed before are awful people. He's just one reaction to it.

You expect people who have to eat societal sh1t sandwiches to smile about it? Do you live amongst what they have done? I doubt it.

Banning Robinson from areas of his own country is what is wrong. Many of us regard the awful people as those you obviously respect.

Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Apr 2024 11.46am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I was mostly addressing that personal view of Robinson wasn't I?

I also have issues against Robinson but again and again I hear this 'Robinson is awful'.....Well, actually I think he stands against a far larger evil when most prefer to close their door and hide.

He takes the slings and arrows from the powerful....the people who have the power and have generationally worsened just about everything.

Given what the disenfranchised future will be for the children of many native people in this country it's likely that someone like Robinson will be remembered and respected as someone who tried.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I totally agree.

What he is trying to do is a lost cause at this time.

Tommy Robinson or that type of figure will be far more effective in about twenty years or if there is societal breakdown after economic collapse.

However....as with much....what you see at the surface isn't the whole story.

As with everything you follow the money. The reason Robinson hasn't given up and gone abroad because of threats to him and his family (which he will eventually) is that he's where his backers want him to be.

He's certainly playing a high risk game.

Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Apr 2024 2.56pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)