You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > one less to blow us up
June 9 2024 1.30pm

one less to blow us up

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 16 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 17 Jun 15 1.06pm

Quote The Sash at 17 Jun 2015 10.58am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Jun 2015 4.36pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 15 Jun 2015 4.29pm

Quote The Sash at 15 Jun 2015 3.36pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 15 Jun 2015 3.26pm

Quote The Sash at 15 Jun 2015 2.47pm

Quote derben at 15 Jun 2015 2.39pm

Imam Farooq Yunus, of the Zakaria Mosque in Savile Town, where the boys attended religious school, said they had been let down by the system. He said: “I think we have failed. Not just the people in here – the whole system - the council, the police, the community. The society have failed these two children and somehow we should put things in place where if they do feel strongly, they know what to do. “The fault lies in the wider community where we are not engaging with them.”

This is what is called 'the narrative' these days. These young men attended a religious school, ie: Islamic school where they no doubt received guidance in how to live the life of a peace loving, tolerant and progressive Muslim. Yet it is apparently the fault of the council, the police and 'the wider community (ie: non-Muslims) that they became homicidal maniacs. Of course, when people such as the teachers, police and 'the wider community' try to stop Islamic indoctrination they are branded as Anti-Islam racists.

Meanwhile the wonderful concept of multi-culturalism carries on regardless, ensuring that the UK is split into a plethora of separate 'communities' which are largely closed to each other and which each have different and conflicting views of how we should live. These two terrorists came from a community which is devoted to an ideology which demands that all who are born into it cannot abandon it and must obey it and propagate it wherever they go, against this, the 'wider community' is an irrelevance.


Edited by derben (15 Jun 2015 2.44pm)

These are such easy statements to make aren't they?

The question to throw back at this obvious imbecile are quite simply 'HOW have the council, police, community and society 'failed' them ?

...or are you just a f~*cking apologist'

Firstly, what are the council supposed to do?

Secondly, the police would be accused of institutional racism if they got involved.

Thirdly, how are the 'wider community' supposed to help when the immediate community do not integrate?

Perhaps the mosque should take a closer look at themselves rather than blame every other c*nt for their students deciding to travel thousands of miles to grow a beard & blow up a building.


It wasn't even a very good beard either was it SE ??

Very patchy. The seventy two virgins will not be impressed with the wispy chin pubes.

Those blokes have been waiting all eternity to pop their cherry, they won't worry about whispy chin pubes


72 virgins...these Muslim suicide bombers must be really pissed when they ascend only to find they are in a male only Star Trek convention

]

They'll have to Takei like a prison bitch.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View serial thriller's Profile serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 17 Jun 15 3.59pm Send a Private Message to serial thriller Add serial thriller as a friend

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 9.58am


Very happy to change 'jihad' to one of its meanings, ie: "a war or struggle against unbelievers". Moazaam Begg is a best an apologist for Islamic terrorism, and at worst a terrorist himself. Presumably you think John Terry should not have been fined and banned for using the word 'black' after being found not guilty by a British court?

As for common and garden Islam, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. There are people who dislike Islam and will continue to dislike it no matter what fatuous legislation is enacted. They dislike it for perfectly good, rational, reasons: honour murders, female genital mutilation, Sharia courts, rampant postal vote fraud, trojan horse schools, hate preachers, anti-gay laws (including the death penalty), anti-women laws, anti-apostate laws (including the death penalty, anti-Semitism, etc.corrupt civil administration,
grooming gangs in dozens of cities etc etc etc


Edited by derben (17 Jun 2015 9.59am)


Who are you to change the definition of a word which has been used for thousands of years, just to suit your political leanings? Accept what you're doing: manipulating the facts for your own ends.

You can't compare the Terry incident with the Moazamm Begg one, particularly given that you are literally suggesting that the verdict of a court of law be subverted, presumably based on nothing. Terry was fined by the FA, but couldn't be charged by the courts because they lacked suitable evidence. My opinion? Of course Terry's a racist prick, but I respect the decision of the courts, who knew a lot more about the case than I did.

And on the subject of disliking Islam (which, by the way, is the definition of Islamophobia), do you then also dislike Christianity, a religion which continues to massacre people, mutilate genitalia, regard women as second class citizens, is incredibly homophobic, has had priests convicted of paedophilia, is horribly corrupt, has justified terrorist atrocities, has been insular etc etc. or is Islam worse?

 


If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 17 Jun 15 4.08pm

Its a good job no Christians have ever been involved in terrorist groups in the UK.

Or are we forgetting the Loyalists and the Provos?

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 17 Jun 15 4.34pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 17 Jun 2015 4.08pm

Its a good job no Christians have ever been involved in terrorist groups in the UK.

Or are we forgetting the Loyalists and the Provos?


Yeah but hardly ended up over religion though Jamie.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 17 Jun 15 4.37pm

Quote serial thriller at 17 Jun 2015 3.59pm

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 9.58am


Very happy to change 'jihad' to one of its meanings, ie: "a war or struggle against unbelievers". Moazaam Begg is a best an apologist for Islamic terrorism, and at worst a terrorist himself. Presumably you think John Terry should not have been fined and banned for using the word 'black' after being found not guilty by a British court?

As for common and garden Islam, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. There are people who dislike Islam and will continue to dislike it no matter what fatuous legislation is enacted. They dislike it for perfectly good, rational, reasons: honour murders, female genital mutilation, Sharia courts, rampant postal vote fraud, trojan horse schools, hate preachers, anti-gay laws (including the death penalty), anti-women laws, anti-apostate laws (including the death penalty, anti-Semitism, etc.corrupt civil administration,
grooming gangs in dozens of cities etc etc etc


Edited by derben (17 Jun 2015 9.59am)


Who are you to change the definition of a word which has been used for thousands of years, just to suit your political leanings? Accept what you're doing: manipulating the facts for your own ends.

You can't compare the Terry incident with the Moazamm Begg one, particularly given that you are literally suggesting that the verdict of a court of law be subverted, presumably based on nothing. Terry was fined by the FA, but couldn't be charged by the courts because they lacked suitable evidence. My opinion? Of course Terry's a racist prick, but I respect the decision of the courts, who knew a lot more about the case than I did.

And on the subject of disliking Islam (which, by the way, is the definition of Islamophobia), do you then also dislike Christianity, a religion which continues to massacre people, mutilate genitalia, regard women as second class citizens, is incredibly homophobic, has had priests convicted of paedophilia, is horribly corrupt, has justified terrorist atrocities, has been insular etc etc. or is Islam worse?

Of course you can compare the Terry case with Begg's. Both were found not guilty of offences although many thought them guilty. You think Terry was guilty and a 'racist prick' for saying the word 'black'; I think Begg was guilty and attended a terrorist training camp and facilitated terrorism overseas. (The fact that Terry was fined and banned by the kangaroo court of the FA is neither here nor there.)

A 'phobia' is a fear of something, not necessarily a dislike. I don't have much time for any religion, but find it hard to take seriously your comments on Christian genital mutilation (who/where?), women as second class citizens (women Bishops now!), homophobic (see many Christian priests and vicars!). As for them massacring people and justifying terrorism - it must be a strange place on planet Serial. (Oh, yes, nearly forgot to answer your last question: yes, Islam is a whole lot worse.)


Edited by derben (17 Jun 2015 4.44pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View serial thriller's Profile serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 17 Jun 15 5.12pm Send a Private Message to serial thriller Add serial thriller as a friend

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 4.37pm

Quote serial thriller at 17 Jun 2015 3.59pm

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 9.58am


Very happy to change 'jihad' to one of its meanings, ie: "a war or struggle against unbelievers". Moazaam Begg is a best an apologist for Islamic terrorism, and at worst a terrorist himself. Presumably you think John Terry should not have been fined and banned for using the word 'black' after being found not guilty by a British court?

As for common and garden Islam, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. There are people who dislike Islam and will continue to dislike it no matter what fatuous legislation is enacted. They dislike it for perfectly good, rational, reasons: honour murders, female genital mutilation, Sharia courts, rampant postal vote fraud, trojan horse schools, hate preachers, anti-gay laws (including the death penalty), anti-women laws, anti-apostate laws (including the death penalty, anti-Semitism, etc.corrupt civil administration,
grooming gangs in dozens of cities etc etc etc


Edited by derben (17 Jun 2015 9.59am)


Who are you to change the definition of a word which has been used for thousands of years, just to suit your political leanings? Accept what you're doing: manipulating the facts for your own ends.

You can't compare the Terry incident with the Moazamm Begg one, particularly given that you are literally suggesting that the verdict of a court of law be subverted, presumably based on nothing. Terry was fined by the FA, but couldn't be charged by the courts because they lacked suitable evidence. My opinion? Of course Terry's a racist prick, but I respect the decision of the courts, who knew a lot more about the case than I did.

And on the subject of disliking Islam (which, by the way, is the definition of Islamophobia), do you then also dislike Christianity, a religion which continues to massacre people, mutilate genitalia, regard women as second class citizens, is incredibly homophobic, has had priests convicted of paedophilia, is horribly corrupt, has justified terrorist atrocities, has been insular etc etc. or is Islam worse?

Of course you can compare the Terry case with Begg's. Both were found not guilty of offences although many thought them guilty. You think Terry was guilty and a 'racist prick' for saying the word 'black'; I think Begg was guilty and attended a terrorist training camp and facilitated terrorism overseas. (The fact that Terry was fined and banned by the kangaroo court of the FA is neither here nor there.)

A 'phobia' is a fear of something, not necessarily a dislike. I don't have much time for any religion, but find it hard to take seriously your comments on Christian genital mutilation (who/where?), women as second class citizens (women Bishops now!), homophobic (see many Christian priests and vicars!). As for them massacring people and justifying terrorism - it must be a strange place on planet Serial.


I'm glad you asked Derben, it's always a nice feeling to teach people new things.

1. In Ethiopia, a Christian country, FGM affects around 85% of women. In other countries like Mali and Burkina Faso, where significant Christian minorities cohabit with Muslims, levels of FGM in those Christian communities is also worryingly high. FGM occurs all over Africa, whether Muslim, Christian or whatever.

2. Female clergy in one country in one strand of Christianity doth not equality make. Congo's civil war lead to the raping of tens of thousands of women in a Christian country, which is ranked, along with Christian Guatemala, as one of the top 10 worst nations to live in as a woman. Even in Western countries like Britain and America, women are dissuaded from work, and taught to be more docile than their husbands.

3. If you can't see homophobia in Christianity, you're beyond help.

4. Here is a list of 6 terrorist organisations who use Christian teachings and ideologies to justify their means, just as Al-Qaeda/IS do with Islam: [Link] Add to that the mass-murders of Anders Breivik, a radical Christian, and you realise that religious justification for atrocities is actually fairly prominent in Christianity!

As a side note, I have nothing against religions. We all follow certain dogmas and superstitions, be they political, theistic, philosophical or nationalistic. Religion has done brilliant humanitarian work, brought solace to millions and provided spiritual guidance across the globe. This is as true of Islam as it is of Christianity. But what is equally true is every religion, from Scientology to Buddhism, has been manipulated for atrocious ends.

 


If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 17 Jun 15 5.27pm

Quote serial thriller at 17 Jun 2015 5.12pm

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 4.37pm

Quote serial thriller at 17 Jun 2015 3.59pm

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 9.58am


Very happy to change 'jihad' to one of its meanings, ie: "a war or struggle against unbelievers". Moazaam Begg is a best an apologist for Islamic terrorism, and at worst a terrorist himself. Presumably you think John Terry should not have been fined and banned for using the word 'black' after being found not guilty by a British court?

As for common and garden Islam, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. There are people who dislike Islam and will continue to dislike it no matter what fatuous legislation is enacted. They dislike it for perfectly good, rational, reasons: honour murders, female genital mutilation, Sharia courts, rampant postal vote fraud, trojan horse schools, hate preachers, anti-gay laws (including the death penalty), anti-women laws, anti-apostate laws (including the death penalty, anti-Semitism, etc.corrupt civil administration,
grooming gangs in dozens of cities etc etc etc


Edited by derben (17 Jun 2015 9.59am)


Who are you to change the definition of a word which has been used for thousands of years, just to suit your political leanings? Accept what you're doing: manipulating the facts for your own ends.

You can't compare the Terry incident with the Moazamm Begg one, particularly given that you are literally suggesting that the verdict of a court of law be subverted, presumably based on nothing. Terry was fined by the FA, but couldn't be charged by the courts because they lacked suitable evidence. My opinion? Of course Terry's a racist prick, but I respect the decision of the courts, who knew a lot more about the case than I did.

And on the subject of disliking Islam (which, by the way, is the definition of Islamophobia), do you then also dislike Christianity, a religion which continues to massacre people, mutilate genitalia, regard women as second class citizens, is incredibly homophobic, has had priests convicted of paedophilia, is horribly corrupt, has justified terrorist atrocities, has been insular etc etc. or is Islam worse?

Of course you can compare the Terry case with Begg's. Both were found not guilty of offences although many thought them guilty. You think Terry was guilty and a 'racist prick' for saying the word 'black'; I think Begg was guilty and attended a terrorist training camp and facilitated terrorism overseas. (The fact that Terry was fined and banned by the kangaroo court of the FA is neither here nor there.)

A 'phobia' is a fear of something, not necessarily a dislike. I don't have much time for any religion, but find it hard to take seriously your comments on Christian genital mutilation (who/where?), women as second class citizens (women Bishops now!), homophobic (see many Christian priests and vicars!). As for them massacring people and justifying terrorism - it must be a strange place on planet Serial.


I'm glad you asked Derben, it's always a nice feeling to teach people new things.

1. In Ethiopia, a Christian country, FGM affects around 85% of women. In other countries like Mali and Burkina Faso, where significant Christian minorities cohabit with Muslims, levels of FGM in those Christian communities is also worryingly high. FGM occurs all over Africa, whether Muslim, Christian or whatever.

2. Female clergy in one country in one strand of Christianity doth not equality make. Congo's civil war lead to the raping of tens of thousands of women in a Christian country, which is ranked, along with Christian Guatemala, as one of the top 10 worst nations to live in as a woman. Even in Western countries like Britain and America, women are dissuaded from work, and taught to be more docile than their husbands.

3. If you can't see homophobia in Christianity, you're beyond help.

4. Here is a list of 6 terrorist organisations who use Christian teachings and ideologies to justify their means, just as Al-Qaeda/IS do with Islam: [Link] Add to that the mass-murders of Anders Breivik, a radical Christian, and you realise that religious justification for atrocities is actually fairly prominent in Christianity!

As a side note, I have nothing against religions. We all follow certain dogmas and superstitions, be they political, theistic, philosophical or nationalistic. Religion has done brilliant humanitarian work, brought solace to millions and provided spiritual guidance across the globe. This is as true of Islam as it is of Christianity. But what is equally true is every religion, from Scientology to Buddhism, has been manipulated for atrocious ends.

So weak. You pick a few isolated examples, most of which have nothing directly to do with Christianity, and try to compare it with the worldwide defects of Islam.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 17 Jun 15 5.30pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote serial thriller at 17 Jun 2015 5.12pm

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 4.37pm

Quote serial thriller at 17 Jun 2015 3.59pm

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 9.58am


Very happy to change 'jihad' to one of its meanings, ie: "a war or struggle against unbelievers". Moazaam Begg is a best an apologist for Islamic terrorism, and at worst a terrorist himself. Presumably you think John Terry should not have been fined and banned for using the word 'black' after being found not guilty by a British court?

As for common and garden Islam, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. There are people who dislike Islam and will continue to dislike it no matter what fatuous legislation is enacted. They dislike it for perfectly good, rational, reasons: honour murders, female genital mutilation, Sharia courts, rampant postal vote fraud, trojan horse schools, hate preachers, anti-gay laws (including the death penalty), anti-women laws, anti-apostate laws (including the death penalty, anti-Semitism, etc.corrupt civil administration,
grooming gangs in dozens of cities etc etc etc


Edited by derben (17 Jun 2015 9.59am)


Who are you to change the definition of a word which has been used for thousands of years, just to suit your political leanings? Accept what you're doing: manipulating the facts for your own ends.

You can't compare the Terry incident with the Moazamm Begg one, particularly given that you are literally suggesting that the verdict of a court of law be subverted, presumably based on nothing. Terry was fined by the FA, but couldn't be charged by the courts because they lacked suitable evidence. My opinion? Of course Terry's a racist prick, but I respect the decision of the courts, who knew a lot more about the case than I did.

And on the subject of disliking Islam (which, by the way, is the definition of Islamophobia), do you then also dislike Christianity, a religion which continues to massacre people, mutilate genitalia, regard women as second class citizens, is incredibly homophobic, has had priests convicted of paedophilia, is horribly corrupt, has justified terrorist atrocities, has been insular etc etc. or is Islam worse?

Of course you can compare the Terry case with Begg's. Both were found not guilty of offences although many thought them guilty. You think Terry was guilty and a 'racist prick' for saying the word 'black'; I think Begg was guilty and attended a terrorist training camp and facilitated terrorism overseas. (The fact that Terry was fined and banned by the kangaroo court of the FA is neither here nor there.)

A 'phobia' is a fear of something, not necessarily a dislike. I don't have much time for any religion, but find it hard to take seriously your comments on Christian genital mutilation (who/where?), women as second class citizens (women Bishops now!), homophobic (see many Christian priests and vicars!). As for them massacring people and justifying terrorism - it must be a strange place on planet Serial.


I'm glad you asked Derben, it's always a nice feeling to teach people new things.

1. In Ethiopia, a Christian country, FGM affects around 85% of women. In other countries like Mali and Burkina Faso, where significant Christian minorities cohabit with Muslims, levels of FGM in those Christian communities is also worryingly high. FGM occurs all over Africa, whether Muslim, Christian or whatever.

2. Female clergy in one country in one strand of Christianity doth not equality make. Congo's civil war lead to the raping of tens of thousands of women in a Christian country, which is ranked, along with Christian Guatemala, as one of the top 10 worst nations to live in as a woman. Even in Western countries like Britain and America, women are dissuaded from work, and taught to be more docile than their husbands.

3. If you can't see homophobia in Christianity, you're beyond help.

4. Here is a list of 6 terrorist organisations who use Christian teachings and ideologies to justify their means, just as Al-Qaeda/IS do with Islam: [Link] Add to that the mass-murders of Anders Breivik, a radical Christian, and you realise that religious justification for atrocities is actually fairly prominent in Christianity!

As a side note, I have nothing against religions. We all follow certain dogmas and superstitions, be they political, theistic, philosophical or nationalistic. Religion has done brilliant humanitarian work, brought solace to millions and provided spiritual guidance across the globe. This is as true of Islam as it is of Christianity. But what is equally true is every religion, from Scientology to Buddhism, has been manipulated for atrocious ends.

Since when was Scientology a religion?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 17 Jun 15 5.45pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Since when was Scientology a religion?


Erm, 10 December 2013. The High Court was quite clear in the case of Louisa Hodkin.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 17 Jun 15 5.47pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote Mapletree at 17 Jun 2015 5.45pm

Since when was Scientology a religion?


Erm, 10 December 2013. The High Court was quite clear in the case of Louisa Hodkin.

Cheers, hadn't seen that. The crazy decisions the courts make sometimes eh?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View serial thriller's Profile serial thriller Flag The Promised Land 17 Jun 15 6.03pm Send a Private Message to serial thriller Add serial thriller as a friend

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 5.27pm


So weak. You pick a few isolated examples, most of which have nothing directly to do with Christianity, and try to compare it with the worldwide defects of Islam.

See this view, in my mind, is hypocritical. When Egypt genitally mutilate women, it's because of Islam. Yet when Ethiopia do it, it's 'nothing directly to do with Christianity'. When Breivik massacres people, writing directly Islamophobic sentiment and calling for radical Catholicism, his religion remains out of the limelight, whereas when Muslims commit similar crimes, their religion is not only the basis for why they did it, but a virulent characteristic which inherently leads people to violence. When Congolese Christians rape women, it's 'nothing directly to do with Christianity'. When IS do similar, it is everything to do with Islam.

Why? And more importantly, why do I even need to waste my time explaining that all religion is used for vicious ends, some to even greater extents than Islam has ever done (the Borges and Crusades killed more than IS ever will)? Islamic society has given us Maths, the guitar, coffee, soap, chemistry etc etc. Islamic nations like Indonesia and Turkey continue to boast some of the most incredible cultures on the planet, far more tolerant and inclusive than ours. If Islam is so evil, why are these countries so wonderful?

Like I say, what follows scapegoating is ignorance, and what follows ignorance is panic. If you are afraid of something, learn more about it and you'll realise that it really isn't that bad after all. Derben, why not pop down to your local mosque and see what they have to say to your criticisms of their religion? I'm sure they'd be willing to discuss it with you.

 


If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 17 Jun 15 6.10pm

Quote serial thriller at 17 Jun 2015 6.03pm

Quote derben at 17 Jun 2015 5.27pm


So weak. You pick a few isolated examples, most of which have nothing directly to do with Christianity, and try to compare it with the worldwide defects of Islam.

See this view, in my mind, is hypocritical. When Egypt genitally mutilate women, it's because of Islam. Yet when Ethiopia do it, it's 'nothing directly to do with Christianity'. When Breivik massacres people, writing directly Islamophobic sentiment and calling for radical Catholicism, his religion remains out of the limelight, whereas when Muslims commit similar crimes, their religion is not only the basis for why they did it, but a virulent characteristic which inherently leads people to violence. When Congolese Christians rape women, it's 'nothing directly to do with Christianity'. When IS do similar, it is everything to do with Islam.

Why? And more importantly, why do I even need to waste my time explaining that all religion is used for vicious ends, some to even greater extents than Islam has ever done (the Borges and Crusades killed more than IS ever will)? Islamic society has given us Maths, the guitar, coffee, soap, chemistry etc etc. Islamic nations like Indonesia and Turkey continue to boast some of the most incredible cultures on the planet, far more tolerant and inclusive than ours. If Islam is so evil, why are these countries so wonderful?

Like I say, what follows scapegoating is ignorance, and what follows ignorance is panic. If you are afraid of something, learn more about it and you'll realise that it really isn't that bad after all. Derben, why not pop down to your local mosque and see what they have to say to your criticisms of their religion? I'm sure they'd be willing to discuss it with you.

LOL. Death penalty for being an apostate from Islam, death penalty for being gay. Women stoned to death for sex 'crimes'. Authors and cartoonists threatened with death. People hung from cranes in public. So tolerant and inclusive!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 9 of 16 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > one less to blow us up