Presumably your UK figures includes the crimes of all the immigrant groups including the over-achieving Romanians. To make a true comparison you would have to produce the crime figures for what you ludicrously call the 'Anglo-Saxons'.

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

I wish they could do something about your posts bearing no relation to anything I write

Thanks for the compliment old bean.You are piling them on in style tonight. How very very "silly and "silly" again for me to have written it

My grandmother was Romanian

I don't really think too much about if someone is white or not if they come from Romania (a country,like us, of various ethnicities). Do you?

Another waste of time discussion with entrenched unmoving views. It's meant to be about so called ISIS BTW.
What we want here is the truth not spin. If bad has been done there is no pint covering it up for the sake of PC.
Equally, always blaming the foreigner is a little one sided.
What we want is unspun facts and unbiased observation (if such a thing still or ever did exist).
This thread does little to contradict the claims from the right of center that liberal/left bias exists in media.
I notice that all the people on the right have been yellow carded and "theJudge" has been banned. I cannot see why by reading these posts. If you want a debate then you have to have two sides, and the moderators seem to have some bias of their own.
Rescind the cards I say and let's discuss like men, not schoolboys.

You are perfectly entitled to your opinion.

And a sensible discussion is always to be welcomed over personal "mud slinging",I agree.

But to deal with just four of your points.

It could be said this thread evidences the "right". bias that exists in the media.Depends how you perceive it.Some might say you are "bang on".Others might say its ironic you say that since it is itself a biased point made by you as part of a post decrying biased posts.

Re yellow cards,you assume posters got cards for their views and/or because of something on this thread.I have no idea why The Judge got a red. You jump to the conclusion it was because of his views.LS got a yellow for trolling, not because of his views.A Mod explained why. FUE may or may not have got a yellow for suggesting on another thread he would booby trap a house here migrants (including kids)lived in,and that the SAS should go in and mow down all the potential migrants (including kids) in Calais.His defenders say he was just joking.

If "wrong has been done",there is no reason to "cover it up" on "PC grounds". If there is a debate about whether that's the case generally and the extent to which "the wrong" illustrates an overall situation or not,that's perfectly legitimate.So,again, there could be those that might say your view/conclusion itself shows a certain bias on your part.Others might say you are "bang on".

I think to suggest that on threads like this and similar,"all" those on the "right" get carded and that there is a need for "two sides" so this needs to be corrected/balanced is just not sustainable when you see the number of posters of the "anti-immigration" "right" generally on General Talk. The "left" are hardly a majority on General Talk IMO.

As for the thread being about ISIS,yes but since when has a thread this long stuck strictly to topic?!

Edited by legaleagle (22 Aug 2015 11.36am)